Should SB979 be enacted, it will directly affect the procedural aspects of legislative amendments in Hawaii. By mandating an additional voting step for amendments not aligned with original bill language, the legislature aims to ensure that significant changes receive proper deliberation. This requirement could enhance transparency and accountability, as legislators will have to engage in further debate on substantive alterations. It may also protect against last-minute changes that could affect bill outcomes or lead to controversial add-ons.
Summary
SB979 seeks to amend Section 92-10 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes concerning legislative procedures. The primary aim of this bill is to clarify the process regarding amendments to bills that are deemed not germane to their prior versions. It emphasizes that any final amendments which fall outside the original scope must secure at least one vote in either the Senate or House of Representatives before final approval can be granted. This change underscores a commitment to legislative clarity and procedural integrity within the legislative process.
Contention
While proponents of SB979 argue that these changes will lead to more orderly legislative processes, potential contention arises among lawmakers who fear that the requirements could slow down legislative progress. There is concern that this additional voting requirement may lead to delays in passing urgent legislation, as well as possible contention about what constitutes 'germane' amendments. Critics may view this as an unnecessary hurdle that complicates legislative efficiency, particularly in times of pressing issues where quick responses are necessary.
Relating to court costs imposed on conviction and deposited to the courthouse security fund or the municipal court building security fund; increasing fees.