Hawaii Senate Bill SCR50

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/22
• Refer: 3/11/22
• Report Pass: 3/23/22
• Engrossed: 3/24/22
• Refer: 3/28/22
• Report Pass: 4/18/22
• Refer: 4/18/22

Caption

Designating The Waianae Moku Kupuna Council As An Advisory Resource To The Elected Members Of The Legislature Of The State Of Hawaii Representing The Waianae Moku Community.

Impact

The resolution's impact on state law is primarily to empower the Waianae Moku Kupuna Council by granting it a formal advisory role. This recognition enables the council to engage more directly with the legislative process, ensuring that the voices and concerns of the Waianae Moku community are heard and addressed. This step is particularly significant in promoting cultural respect and recognition for the historical and cultural knowledge that kupuna possess regarding local and state issues. Regular meetings between the council and legislators are anticipated to foster continual dialogue regarding community priorities.

Summary

SCR50 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution from the State of Hawaii that formally designates the Waianae Moku Kupuna Council as an advisory resource to the elected members of the Legislature representing the Waianae Moku community. This resolution acknowledges the significant role that kupuna (elders) play within the community, serving as advisors and holding respected positions that provide guidance on matters critical to community members. By recognizing the council, the bill aims to strengthen the relationship between elected officials and the community, encouraging regular meetings for effective input on local issues.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SCR50 appears to be positive, with support for recognizing the wisdom and cultural insights of the kupuna in the legislative process. Many view this resolution as a means to enhance the representation of the Waianae Moku community within state governance, thereby promoting a more inclusive political environment. Coupled with this support, the resolution reflects a broader appreciation for indigenous and cultural practices, highlighting the value placed on elders in Hawaiian society. However, this positive reception may not be universal, as discussions on increasing advisory roles can sometimes spark debate over the balance of influence between formal legislative processes and community input.

Contention

While SCR50 seeks to unify the legislative body with community perspectives, potential contentions may arise regarding the efficacy and frequency of the proposed meetings. There may be varying opinions about how much weight such advisory councils should carry in legislative decision-making, raising questions about the balance between expert input and elected authority. Some critics might argue that while community input is valuable, it should not compromise the decision-making processes of elected lawmakers who may have broader strategic considerations. Thus, while the resolution promotes dialogue, the practical execution of such an advisory role will be closely watched.