Hawaii Senate Bill SCR84

Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/23
• Refer: 3/15/23
• Report Pass: 4/4/23
• Engrossed: 4/5/23
• Refer: 4/11/23

Caption

Requesting That The Chief Information Officer Review Whether All Departments, Agencies, And Offices Of The State Have Up-to-date Technology To Reduce Cyber Threats And Help Protect The State Against Cyberattacks.

Impact

SCR84 highlights recent significant cyber incidents, including notable cybersecurity breaches affecting entities not only in the U.S. but globally. By examining the current technology holdings and security measures of state offices, the resolution aims to initiate actions that could bolster Hawaii's cybersecurity framework. It also entails a requirement for departments to coordinate and assist in identifying any technological deficiencies that might expose them to cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution 84 (SCR84) requests that the Chief Information Officer of Hawaii review the current technology state across all departments, agencies, and offices within the state government. This review aims to assess whether these entities possess up-to-date technology that can mitigate cyber threats and enhance the state's defense against potential cyberattacks. The need for such a review has been underscored by a rise in the frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks targeting government systems and critical infrastructure, which poses a significant risk to sensitive public data and operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR84 appears to be supportive, given the heightened awareness of cyber threats in a context where governmental bodies and infrastructure are increasingly under siege. Lawmakers recognize the necessity of up-to-date technology in equipping state services against ongoing and emerging cyber challenges. However, the degree of cooperation and the effectiveness of implementing the proposed changes may generate future discussions among stakeholders.

Contention

While the resolution itself does not appear contentious, it raises important questions regarding resource allocation and prioritization for technology upgrades. The potential recommendations and legislative proposals stemming from this review could lead to public discourse on funding, state priorities, and how best to implement cybersecurity measures without overreaching into issues of privacy and personal data management.