Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB732

Introduced
1/23/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Introduced
1/23/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Refer
3/10/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Report Pass
4/3/23  
Refer
3/10/23  

Caption

Relating To Complaints Alleging Violations Of Campaign Spending Laws.

Impact

The passage of HB732 modifies the processes by which complaints are managed, giving respondents a defined opportunity to respond to complaints regarding campaign finance violations. If a respondent fails to respond within 30 days of receiving a complaint, such inaction can trigger a rebuttable presumption that a violation has occurred. This new presumption aims to streamline the enforcement of campaign finance laws and to instill a sense of urgency in the response process. Additionally, the Act is designed to improve public confidence in the integrity of state campaign financing, which is vital for nurturing a robust democratic environment in Hawaii.

Summary

House Bill 732 addresses complaints alleging violations of campaign spending laws in Hawaii. The legislation is rooted in recommendations made by the commission established under House Resolution No. 9 during the Regular Session of 2022, which aimed to enhance the standards of conduct for public officers and employees. The bill proposes amendments to existing statutes to improve oversight by the Campaign Spending Commission, which is responsible for managing the complexities of campaign finance regulation. Specifically, the bill focuses on ensuring that complaints of violations are handled efficiently, especially crucial during election years when adherence to these regulations is paramount.

Contention

During discussions around HB732, points of contention may arise regarding the balance between regulatory enforcement and the rights of individuals or entities accused of violations. Some members of the legislature will likely advocate that the rebuttable presumption for inaction may infringe on the due process rights of respondents. This aspect of the bill could attract scrutiny regarding whether it effectively reinforces ethical conduct or poses potential risks to fair treatment in the enforcement of campaign finance regulations. Opponents may argue against the presumption being perceived as punitive rather than simply regulatory.

Companion Bills

HI HB732

Carry Over Relating To Complaints Alleging Violations Of Campaign Spending Laws.

Previously Filed As

HI HB732

Relating To Complaints Alleging Violations Of Campaign Spending Laws.

HI SB203

Relating To Complaints Alleging Violations Of Campaign Spending Laws.

HI HB98

Relating To Complaints Alleging Violations Of Campaign Spending Laws.

HI HB98

Relating To Complaints Alleging Violations Of Campaign Spending Laws.

HI HB733

Relating To Violations Of Campaign Finance Law.

HI HB733

Relating To Violations Of Campaign Finance Law.

HI HB730

Relating To Campaign Spending Cash Contributions.

HI HB730

Relating To Campaign Spending Cash Contributions.

HI HB731

Relating To Campaign Spending Commission Orders.

HI HB731

Relating To Campaign Spending Commission Orders.

Similar Bills

HI HB732

Relating To Complaints Alleging Violations Of Campaign Spending Laws.

HI SB203

Relating To Complaints Alleging Violations Of Campaign Spending Laws.

HI HB718

Relating To Preliminary Determination Of Probable Cause.

HI HB718

Relating To Preliminary Determination Of Probable Cause.

AZ HB2667

Campaign finance complaints; resolution

AZ HB2666

Campaign finance; third-party complaints

AZ SB1543

Election and ethics; commission; duties

HI HB97

Relating To Preliminary Determination Of Probable Cause.