Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2333

Introduced
1/19/24  
Introduced
1/19/24  
Report Pass
2/21/24  
Refer
1/19/24  
Engrossed
2/29/24  
Report Pass
2/21/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Engrossed
2/29/24  
Report Pass
3/27/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Report Pass
3/27/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Enrolled
5/1/24  
Enrolled
5/1/24  
Chaptered
5/24/24  
Chaptered
5/24/24  

Caption

Relating To Election Audits.

Impact

The bill, if enacted, would alter how audits are conducted in the state, particularly concerning electronic voting systems and the verification processes associated with them. By permitting the use of accurate copies for audits, it seeks to facilitate a more swift and effective verification of election results, theoretically enhancing the integrity and trust in the state's voting system. This could impact how election officials prepare for and execute audits in future elections, potentially leading to faster results and greater confidence in electoral outcomes.

Summary

Senate Bill 2333 aims to amend existing election laws in Hawaii concerning the auditing of electronic voting systems. The bill allows the chief election officer to utilize accurate copies of paper ballots instead of the original paper ballots when conducting precinct audits of the electronic voting system's tally. This change is intended to improve efficiency without compromising the audit's precision, as verified copies can streamline the auditing process while maintaining accuracy in results.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 2333 appears to be cautiously optimistic, with support for its intent to enhance efficiency and maintain electoral integrity. However, there may be voices questioning the sufficiency of using copies instead of originals, as critics might argue that using original ballots ensures the highest level of accuracy. The debate surrounding the bill emphasizes the balancing act between streamlining election processes and maintaining rigorous accountability measures.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely revolve around whether the use of copies could lead to any disputes regarding the authenticity of the ballot counts, especially in close races. Some stakeholders may express concerns about the potential for misinterpretations or unauthorized alterations of the copies used in audits. Additionally, there will be discussions about the technical safeguards required to ensure the integrity of these copied ballots in the auditing process, making it essential for lawmakers to address these concerns directly in any implementation guidelines.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

HI SB2334

Relating To Election Audits.

HI HB132

Relating To Elections.

HI HB132

Relating To Elections.

HI SB180

Relating To Elections.

HI SB180

Relating To Elections.

HI HB1754

Relating To Election Ballots.

HI AB2125

Election results: risk-limiting audits.

HI SB1651

Elections; hand count audit; selection

HI SB1342

Elections; parties; hand count audits

HI SB1348

Elections; hand count; tabulators prohibited

Similar Bills

HI SB2334

Relating To Election Audits.

CA AB1154

Official canvass: one-percent manual tally.

CA AB2125

Election results: risk-limiting audits.

AZ SB1666

Early ballot list; daily returns

AZ HB2425

Voter registration information; registers; violations

AZ HB2590

Voter registration database; updates; counties

AZ SB1375

Voter registration rolls; internet access

AZ SB1223

Early ballot list; daily returns