Hawaii Senate Bill SR123

Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/8/24
• Refer: 3/14/24
• Report Pass: 4/3/24
• Passed: 4/4/24

Caption

Requesting Stakeholders To Update The East-west Center Study Titled "hawaii As An East-west Bridge: A Survey Of The Economic Value Of Non-tourist International Activities In Hawaii".

Impact

If passed, SR123 will lead to the commissioning or undertaking of an updated survey, which is expected to yield insights that could influence economic development strategies in Hawaii. By focusing on non-tourist international activities, the state aims to broaden its understanding of various international exchanges and their benefits beyond the traditional tourism sector. This could potentially lead to diversified economic growth opportunities, attracting investment and fostering partnerships across borders.

Summary

Senate Resolution 123 (SR123) is a legislative proposal from the State of Hawaii requesting that stakeholders update an important study conducted by the East-West Center. Originally conducted in 1990, the study titled 'Hawaii as an East-West Bridge: A Survey of the Economic Value of Non-Tourist International Activities in Hawaii' aimed to assess the benefits of Hawaii's participation in international affairs. The resolution emphasizes the need for current data to better inform policies and initiatives regarding the economic impact of non-tourist international activities in Hawaii, reflecting changes in the global landscape since the original study.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SR123 appears to be positive, as it seeks proactive engagement with stakeholders to assess and enhance the economic value of Hawaii in the context of international relations. Supporters likely view this resolution as an important step towards bolstering Hawaii's position as a strategic hub in the Pacific, promoting ongoing relevance in global affairs. There is generally a consensus of appreciation among legislators for furthering evidence-based policy making.

Contention

There may be concerns regarding the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the updated study, given the passage of time since the original. Some stakeholders might also debate the methodologies used in the survey and whether the findings would adequately represent the interests of different sectors affected by non-tourist international activities. Although specific points of contention were not detailed in the vote records, any resolution involving multiple stakeholders typically brings to the fore various perspectives and potential disagreements on execution strategies.