Hawaii Senate Bill SCR154

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/25
• Refer: 3/12/25
• Refer: 3/28/25

Caption

Supporting The Implementation Of The Recommendations From All Cycles Of The Universal Periodic Review By The United Nations Human Rights Council, Where Applicable To The State.

Impact

SCR154 calls attention to the need for the State of Hawaii to align its human rights policies with international standards as established during the UPR process. It aims to promote a culture of human rights across the state and encourages broader public engagement in matters relating to human rights, sustainable development, and climate change. By advocating for these recommendations, the resolution seeks to transform local communities, fostering an inclusive approach toward human rights that incorporates the voices and needs of residents. Through this commitment, it also aims to address significant human rights issues identified in past UPR cycles, striving for improvements in state practices.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution 154 (SCR154) seeks to endorse and support the implementation of recommendations derived from all cycles of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) conducted by the United Nations Human Rights Council. This resolution emphasizes the importance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, positing that they are essential values pertinent to both the United States and the global community. As the fourth UPR cycle is set to occur, with the United States' review scheduled for November 10, 2025, SCR154 serves as a proactive measure to ensure that the forthcoming recommendations are actively considered and executed at the state level.

Contention

SCR154 advocates for the adoption of various recommendations made during the UPR which, while broadly supported, could spark debate regarding their applicability and implementation at the state level. Some stakeholders may argue about the alignment of specific recommendations with existing state laws or priorities. Concerns could arise regarding local autonomy in addressing human rights issues versus adherence to broader international recommendations. Additionally, the emphasis on participation from civil society and local organizations highlights the necessity of engaging diverse perspectives, potentially leading to differing interpretations of how these recommendations should be enacted in practice.