Hawaii Senate Bill SR183

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/25
• Refer: 3/12/25

Caption

Requesting The Judiciary To Urge Courts To Prioritize Victim And Witness Rights To Speedy Trials.

Impact

If enacted, SR183 would potentially transform how various courts in Hawaii handle cases involving victims of sexual offenses. By requesting the judiciary to encourage the Family, District, and Circuit Courts to prioritize the rights of victims, the resolution underscores the importance of minimizing delays in legal proceedings. This could lead to a significant shift in court practices, aiming to limit the number of continuances allowed in cases involving minors to no more than three, which would compel the courts to expedite trials effectively and limit the emotional burden on victims, especially children.

Summary

Senate Resolution 183 (SR183) of the State of Hawaii, introduced during the Thirty-third Legislature in 2025, seeks to enhance the rights of victims and witnesses by urging courts to prioritize their rights to speedy trials. The resolution highlights that victims of sexual offenses often face severe emotional repercussions from prolonged court processes. It specifically points out the vulnerabilities of young victims, who can develop serious psychological issues as a result of their involvement in these proceedings. This resolution is seen as a necessary step because Hawaii currently lacks comprehensive 'speedy trial' statutes that many other states have adopted.

Contention

While the resolution has potential benefits for victims seeking justice, it may also raise questions about the rights of defendants and the judicial process. Critics might argue that hastening trials without sufficient preparation could disadvantage defendants or compromise the integrity of the proceedings. Furthermore, there will be ongoing discussions about how to balance the rights of victims with those of the accused, ensuring fairness in a legal system that must serve both parties. The judicial system's ability to adapt to these new priorities while maintaining due process will be a critical focus of future debates surrounding this resolution.