Iowa House Bill HF2364

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/24
• Engrossed: 2/21/24
• Refer: 2/22/24
• Enrolled: 4/24/24
• Passed: 5/16/24

Caption

A bill for an act requiring the natural resource commission to research and develop recommendations relating to state park accessibility for persons with disabilities. (Formerly HF 2009.) Effective date: 07/01/2024.

Impact

The implications of HF2364 will resonate throughout state laws related to disability rights and park operations. By formalizing the research and recommendations process, the bill aims to align the accessibility standards of state parks with contemporary needs and expectations for inclusivity. This could lead to significant adjustments in infrastructure and policies, fostering an environment where outdoor exploration is accessible to all individuals, regardless of physical limitations.

Summary

House File 2364 mandates the Natural Resource Commission to conduct research and develop recommendations pertaining to the accessibility of state parks and public recreation for persons with disabilities. This legislation reflects a commitment to improving inclusivity in recreational spaces, ensuring that individuals with disabilities have equitable access to outdoor activities and amenities that state parks provide. The bill is set to take effect on July 1, 2024, marking a significant legislative effort towards enhancing accessibility in Iowa's public recreational facilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HF2364 appears largely positive, as it focuses on advancing the rights of individuals with disabilities. Legislators expressed broad support for the bill, highlighting a shared belief in the importance of access to nature and recreation for everyone. Few, if any, voiced concerns against the bill, indicating a prevalent agreement on the need for improved accessibility within state parks.

Contention

Notably, there seem to be minimal points of contention associated with HF2364. The bill's clear focus on improving accessibility and the resulting bipartisan support suggest a consensus among lawmakers. However, future discussions may center on the potential costs and specific strategies the Natural Resource Commission will propose as they implement the requirements of the bill, areas which could prompt debate as the recommendations are developed and presented.