Iowa Senate Bill SSB1195

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/23
• Refer: 2/27/23

Caption

A bill for an act relating to county or city legislation affecting dog ownership.(See SF 476.)

Impact

By enacting SSB1195, the state would significantly impact existing municipal regulations, as local governments would no longer have the authority to impose breed-specific limitations on dog ownership. This amendment to the Code of Iowa extends a clear message about state-level commitment to ensuring that pet ownership rights are protected against potentially biased local ordinances. Supporters of the bill argue that it prevents unwarranted discrimination against certain breeds, potentially fostering a more pet-friendly environment across Iowa while alleviating concerns of arbitrary breed bans that may emerge at the local level.

Summary

Senate Study Bill 1195 (SSB1195) aims to restrict local governments in Iowa from adopting, enforcing, or administering any ordinances that limit an individual's right to own or keep a dog based on its breed or perceived breed. The bill asserts that counties and cities may not create targeted regulations regarding owner rights tied to specific breeds, while still allowing general regulations applicable to all dogs. This legislative move seeks to standardize dog ownership regulations across various jurisdictions in the state, enhancing pet owner rights and addressing concerns regarding perceived discrimination based on dog breeds.

Contention

Debate surrounding SSB1195 likely centers around the balance between state oversight and local governance. Advocates for the bill include pet owners and certain interest groups who argue for the protection of canine rights, emphasizing the idea that a dog's behavior is not determined by its breed but rather by its upbringing and training. Conversely, opponents may raise concerns that the bill undermines local authority to address specific community needs related to dog ownership and public safety. The contention reflects broader discussions about local control versus state intervention in matters of municipal regulations.