Iowa House Bill HF58

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/15/25
• Refer: 1/15/25

Caption

A bill for an act relating to insurance coverage for the treatment of eating disorders.

Impact

If enacted, HF58 will significantly impact how insurance providers manage coverage for eating disorders, requiring them to offer services that are comparable to those provided for general physical illnesses. This is aimed at eliminating discrepancies in coverage that patients with eating disorders currently face, ensuring that their treatment plans, including both in-state and out-of-state services when necessary, are honored by their insurance providers. The bill also stipulates that coverage must not impose greater cost-sharing requirements than those for other medical conditions.

Summary

House File 58 (HF58) is proposed legislation aimed at ensuring comprehensive insurance coverage for the treatment of eating disorders in the state of Iowa. The bill mandates that health insurance policies must provide coverage for various types of services associated with the treatment of specified eating disorders, which include disorders such as anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, and others as recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This coverage is to be made available for treatment plans developed by qualified health care professionals in consultation with the covered person or their representative.

Contention

One of the notable points of discussion surrounding HF58 includes potential concerns from insurance companies regarding increased costs associated with mandated coverage. Opponents may argue that mandating such specific coverage could lead to higher premiums for insurance policyholders overall. However, supporters of the bill assert that better access to necessary treatment can ultimately result in improved public health outcomes, thereby potentially reducing long-term healthcare costs through early and effective intervention for eating disorders. The forthcoming discussion in legislative committees will likely address these financial implications in further detail.