Iowa House Bill HF679

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/25
• Refer: 2/28/25

Caption

A bill for an act relating to county and city authorization to impose fees for the provision of single-use plastic bags.

Impact

One major impact of HF679 is that it amends existing regulations that prevent local governments from enforcing ordinances that differ from state laws regarding consumer merchandise. Under current law, cities and counties are restricted from setting additional standards that might complicate the regulatory landscape. However, with this bill, local authorities can introduce fees for single-use plastic bags, which could lead to diverse policy implementations across different regions within Iowa. The possibility of local fees is intended to encourage residents to reduce their reliance on single-use bags, aligning local practices with broader environmental goals.

Summary

House File 679 is a legislative proposal designed to authorize counties and cities in Iowa to impose fees for the provision of single-use plastic bags. The bill specifically defines a single-use plastic bag as one that is provided by a retailer to consumers at the point of sale, excluding certain types such as prescription bags and those used for unwrapped food items. This definition is significant as it differentiates single-use plastic bags from broader classifications of containers, which currently face regulations under state law.

Contention

The bill may encounter contention due to the ongoing debates around environmental sustainability versus economic implications for retailers and consumers. Supporters of the bill argue that local control in tackling the issue of plastic waste is essential for communities to address their unique environmental challenges. Conversely, opponents may express concerns regarding the burden of additional fees on consumers, particularly in lower-income areas, as well as the potential complications for retailers who must navigate varying local policies. Thus, while HF679 seeks to establish regulatory flexibility at the local level, it also raises questions about equitable access and the implementation of such fees.