Iowa House Bill HF903

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/25
• Engrossed: 3/26/25
• Refer: 3/27/25
• Enrolled: 5/6/25
• Passed: 5/6/25

Caption

A bill for an act relating to partial payments during construction of a farm-to-market road. (Formerly HSB 296.) Effective date: 07/01/2025.

Impact

The primary impact of HF903 is on the financial procedures surrounding the construction management of farm-to-market roads. By formalizing the process for partial payments, the legislation aims to enhance the financial accountability of such projects. It serves to ensure that while contractors receive timely payments for ongoing work, there is still a mechanism in place that protects the interests of the government and taxpayers. This clarification could potentially streamline operations and reduce disputes regarding payment structures and project quality.

Summary

House File 903 (HF903) addresses the process of making partial payments during the construction of farm-to-market roads in Iowa. The bill amends Section 310.18 of the Iowa Code, clarifying that while partial payments can be approved on work in progress, they do not constitute final acceptance of the work nor waive any defects. The involvement of the board of supervisors, county engineer, or department in approving claims is also outlined, establishing a framework for managing financial transactions during road construction projects.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HF903 appears to be positive, with strong bipartisan support evidenced by the unanimous voting history—46 yeas and 0 nays at its most recent vote. Legislators recognize the importance of financial clarity in construction projects and the potential for improved management of public resources. The bill seems to resonate well with both proponents of fiscal responsibility and advocates for infrastructure development.

Contention

While HF903 received broad support, there are underlying concerns about the implications of standardized payment processes on local governance and flexibility in construction management. Some stakeholders may argue that while the bill simplifies financial measures, it could inadvertently constrain local officials' ability to negotiate and adjust payment terms based on specific project needs or unique local conditions. The balance between local control and standardized procedures may be an ongoing point of discussion as the bill is implemented.