Iowa House Bill HJR10

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/25
• Refer: 2/28/25

Caption

A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to the right to reproductive care.

Impact

If passed, HJR10 would significantly alter the legal framework surrounding reproductive health in Iowa. It posits that individuals' decisions regarding their reproductive health cannot be restricted unless there is a compelling state interest, which must be pursued through the least restrictive means. Additionally, the bill permits regulation of abortion care following fetal viability but states that such regulations cannot prohibit medically indicated abortions intended to protect the health of the pregnant individual.

Process

Should HJR10 gain the requisite support, the proposed amendment would be published and referred to the next general assembly for consideration before being submitted to voters for ratification. This process underscores the democratic approach to amending the constitution, ensuring that the residents of Iowa have a direct say in such pivotal issues.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 10 (HJR10) proposes a constitutional amendment to affirm and guarantee the right to reproductive care in the state of Iowa. This amendment emphasizes that the state cannot deny or interfere with an individual's reproductive freedom, which includes a wide range of healthcare services such as prenatal care, abortion, and infertility treatment. The language of the resolution considers reproductive freedom a fundamental individual right, aiming to ensure that personal decisions regarding reproductive health remain private and protected from state interference.

Contention

The amendment has raised numerous points of contention among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Supporters argue that it is vital to protect the rights of individuals to make decisions regarding their own bodies without government interference. They claim that such protections are necessary especially in the wake of changing laws and attitudes toward reproductive rights in other states. Opponents, however, may argue that this amendment could encourage more liberal decisions surrounding abortion and could complicate the legal landscape regarding when the state can intervene in reproductive healthcare, potentially leading to conflicts with existing laws.