Iowa Senate Bill SF342

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/18/25
• Refer: 2/18/25

Caption

A bill for an act establishing the criminal offense of unlawful electronic transmission of sexually explicit visual material, and providing penalties.

Impact

The implications of SF342 are significant as it creates a specific legal framework to address the misuse of electronic communication for transmitting sexually explicit content without consent. By establishing such a law, it aims to provide a legal recourse for victims of such unsolicited material, potentially fostering a safer digital environment. This law would amend existing sections in the Iowa Code regarding criminal offenses related to sexual conduct, thus harmonizing state laws with societal standards on digital consent and safety.

Summary

Senate File 342 establishes the criminal offense of unlawful electronic transmission of sexually explicit visual material. The bill specifically targets adults who knowingly send unsolicited electronic pictures or videos that depict sexually explicit content, including genitals, acts of sex, or other explicit imagery. If a person over the age of eighteen commits this offense, it is classified as a serious misdemeanor, with potential penalties including up to one year of confinement and fines ranging from $430 to $2,560. Furthermore, an individual convicted under this bill would also be required to register as a sex offender.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding this bill include concerns regarding the definition of what constitutes 'unsolicited' and 'sexually explicit' content, which could lead to ambiguities in enforcement. Critics may argue about the potential for overreach in criminalizing certain behaviors that might not be harmful, while supporters contend it is a necessary step to protect individuals from harassment and violation of privacy in a digital space. The requirement for those convicted under the bill to register as sex offenders has also invoked debate, as it carries lifelong implications for personal and professional life, raising questions about fairness in punishment and rehabilitation.