Illinois 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB1672 Introduced / Bill

Filed 02/05/2025

                    104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
 State of Illinois
 2025 and 2026 SB1672 Introduced 2/5/2025, by Sen. Christopher Belt - Julie A. Morrison SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: 105 ILCS 5/2-3.161105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new Amends the School Code. Provides that the State Board of Education shall include in its handbook regarding dyslexia guidelines on the administration of universal screeners for a risk of reading difficulties and secondary reviews, the interpretation of data from these screeners and reviews, and the resulting appropriate intervention within a multi-tiered system of support framework. Requires the State Board to adopt any rules necessary to ensure that a student will be screened for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener. Provides that a student shall be screened: (1) if the student is enrolled in a public school in any of grades kindergarten through 3; (2) if the student is in any of grades kindergarten through 3, transfers to a new public school, and has not been screened twice previously during the school year; (3) if the student is in grade 4 or higher and the student's teacher, parent, or guardian requests that the student be screened for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener; or (4) if the student is from another state and enrolls for the first time in any of grades kindergarten through 3 in a school district in the State. Provides that, beginning with the 2025-2026 school year, each school district must screen students, no less than twice each school year, in grades kindergarten through 3 for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener approved by the State Board. Provides for intervention. Requires a report to the State Board. Makes other changes. Effective immediately. LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY   A BILL FOR 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
 State of Illinois
 2025 and 2026 SB1672 Introduced 2/5/2025, by Sen. Christopher Belt - Julie A. Morrison SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:  105 ILCS 5/2-3.161105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new 105 ILCS 5/2-3.161  105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new  105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new  Amends the School Code. Provides that the State Board of Education shall include in its handbook regarding dyslexia guidelines on the administration of universal screeners for a risk of reading difficulties and secondary reviews, the interpretation of data from these screeners and reviews, and the resulting appropriate intervention within a multi-tiered system of support framework. Requires the State Board to adopt any rules necessary to ensure that a student will be screened for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener. Provides that a student shall be screened: (1) if the student is enrolled in a public school in any of grades kindergarten through 3; (2) if the student is in any of grades kindergarten through 3, transfers to a new public school, and has not been screened twice previously during the school year; (3) if the student is in grade 4 or higher and the student's teacher, parent, or guardian requests that the student be screened for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener; or (4) if the student is from another state and enrolls for the first time in any of grades kindergarten through 3 in a school district in the State. Provides that, beginning with the 2025-2026 school year, each school district must screen students, no less than twice each school year, in grades kindergarten through 3 for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener approved by the State Board. Provides for intervention. Requires a report to the State Board. Makes other changes. Effective immediately.  LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b     LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY  STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY   A BILL FOR
104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
 State of Illinois
 2025 and 2026 SB1672 Introduced 2/5/2025, by Sen. Christopher Belt - Julie A. Morrison SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
105 ILCS 5/2-3.161105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new 105 ILCS 5/2-3.161  105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new  105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new
105 ILCS 5/2-3.161
105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new
105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new
Amends the School Code. Provides that the State Board of Education shall include in its handbook regarding dyslexia guidelines on the administration of universal screeners for a risk of reading difficulties and secondary reviews, the interpretation of data from these screeners and reviews, and the resulting appropriate intervention within a multi-tiered system of support framework. Requires the State Board to adopt any rules necessary to ensure that a student will be screened for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener. Provides that a student shall be screened: (1) if the student is enrolled in a public school in any of grades kindergarten through 3; (2) if the student is in any of grades kindergarten through 3, transfers to a new public school, and has not been screened twice previously during the school year; (3) if the student is in grade 4 or higher and the student's teacher, parent, or guardian requests that the student be screened for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener; or (4) if the student is from another state and enrolls for the first time in any of grades kindergarten through 3 in a school district in the State. Provides that, beginning with the 2025-2026 school year, each school district must screen students, no less than twice each school year, in grades kindergarten through 3 for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener approved by the State Board. Provides for intervention. Requires a report to the State Board. Makes other changes. Effective immediately.
LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b     LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
    LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY  STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY
 STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY
A BILL FOR
SB1672LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672  LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672  LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  AN ACT concerning education.
2  Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3  represented in the General Assembly:
4  Section 5. The School Code is amended by changing Section
5  2-3.161 and by adding Sections 10-20.53a and 34-18.45a as
6  follows:
7  (105 ILCS 5/2-3.161)
8  Sec. 2-3.161. Definition of dyslexia; reading instruction
9  advisory group; handbook; screening and support.
10  (a) As used in this Section, "universal screener" means a
11  tool that is used to predict which students may be at risk for
12  poor learning outcomes, including a risk for reading
13  difficulties, and is typically brief, valid, and reliable and
14  conducted with all students at a particular grade level.
15  The State Board of Education shall incorporate, in both
16  general education and special education, the following
17  definition of dyslexia:
18  Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is
19  neurobiological in origin. Dyslexia is characterized by
20  difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition
21  and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. These
22  difficulties typically result from a deficit in the
23  phonological component of language that is often

 

104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
 State of Illinois
 2025 and 2026 SB1672 Introduced 2/5/2025, by Sen. Christopher Belt - Julie A. Morrison SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
105 ILCS 5/2-3.161105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new 105 ILCS 5/2-3.161  105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new  105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new
105 ILCS 5/2-3.161
105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new
105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new
Amends the School Code. Provides that the State Board of Education shall include in its handbook regarding dyslexia guidelines on the administration of universal screeners for a risk of reading difficulties and secondary reviews, the interpretation of data from these screeners and reviews, and the resulting appropriate intervention within a multi-tiered system of support framework. Requires the State Board to adopt any rules necessary to ensure that a student will be screened for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener. Provides that a student shall be screened: (1) if the student is enrolled in a public school in any of grades kindergarten through 3; (2) if the student is in any of grades kindergarten through 3, transfers to a new public school, and has not been screened twice previously during the school year; (3) if the student is in grade 4 or higher and the student's teacher, parent, or guardian requests that the student be screened for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener; or (4) if the student is from another state and enrolls for the first time in any of grades kindergarten through 3 in a school district in the State. Provides that, beginning with the 2025-2026 school year, each school district must screen students, no less than twice each school year, in grades kindergarten through 3 for a risk of reading difficulties using a universal screener approved by the State Board. Provides for intervention. Requires a report to the State Board. Makes other changes. Effective immediately.
LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b     LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
    LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY  STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY
 STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY
A BILL FOR

 

 

105 ILCS 5/2-3.161
105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new
105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new



    LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b

 STATE MANDATES ACT MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT MAY APPLY



 

 



 

  SB1672  LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 2 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 2 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 2 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and
2  the provision of effective classroom instruction.
3  Secondary consequences may include problems in reading
4  comprehension and reduced reading experience that can
5  impede growth of vocabulary and background knowledge.
6  (b) (Blank).
7  (c) The State Board of Education shall develop and
8  maintain a handbook to be made available on its Internet
9  website that provides guidance for pupils, parents or
10  guardians, and teachers on the subject of dyslexia. The
11  handbook shall include, but is not limited to:
12  (1) guidelines for teachers and parents or guardians
13  on how to identify signs of dyslexia;
14  (2) a description of educational strategies that have
15  been shown to improve the academic performance of pupils
16  with dyslexia; and
17  (3) a description of resources and services available
18  to pupils with dyslexia, parents or guardians of pupils
19  with dyslexia, and teachers; and .
20  (4) guidelines on the administration of universal
21  screeners for a risk of reading difficulties and secondary
22  reviews, the interpretation of data from these screeners
23  and reviews, and the resulting appropriate intervention
24  under Section 10-20.53a or 34-18.45a within a multi-tiered
25  system of support framework.
26  The State Board shall review the handbook once every 4

 

 

  SB1672 - 2 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 3 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 3 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 3 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  years to update, if necessary, the guidelines, educational
2  strategies, or resources and services made available in the
3  handbook.
4  (d) The State Board shall adopt any rules necessary to
5  ensure that a student will be screened, as provided under
6  Section 10-20.53a or 34-18.45a, for a risk of reading
7  difficulties, including dyslexia, using a universal screener.
8  The purpose of the universal screener is to identify, through
9  a school district's multi-tiered system of support framework,
10  students who may be at risk of reading difficulties, not to
11  indicate a need to initiate an evaluation for special
12  education. A student shall be screened:
13  (1) if the student is enrolled in a public school in
14  any of grades kindergarten through 3;
15  (2) if the student is in any of grades kindergarten
16  through 3 and:
17  (A) transfers to a new public school; and
18  (B) has not been screened twice previously during
19  the school year;
20  (3) if the student is in grade 4 or higher and the
21  student's teacher, parent, or guardian requests that the
22  student be screened for a risk of reading difficulties,
23  including dyslexia, using a universal screener; or
24  (4) if the student is from another state and enrolls
25  for the first time in any of grades kindergarten through 3
26  in a school district in this State.

 

 

  SB1672 - 3 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 4 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 4 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 4 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  (e) As outlined in the State Board of Education's
2  comprehensive literacy plan under subsection (c) of Section
3  2-3.200, a universal screener administered to a student who is
4  an English learner must, in consultation with the school's or
5  school district's English learner team, be administered in the
6  student's first language, if possible, or account for language
7  differences. The screening must be culturally and
8  linguistically responsive, and the English learner team must
9  differentiate between language acquisition challenges and
10  reading difficulties.
11  (f) As outlined in the State Board of Education's handbook
12  under subsection (c) of this Section and the State Board of
13  Education's comprehensive literacy plan under subsection (c)
14  of Section 2-3.200, a universal screener must include, as
15  developmentally appropriate, all of the following:
16  (1) phonological and phonemic awareness;
17  (2) sound symbol recognition;
18  (3) alphabet knowledge;
19  (4) decoding skills;
20  (5) rapid automatic naming skills;
21  (6) encoding skills; and
22  (7) oral reading fluency.
23  (g) The State Board of Education is authorized, to the
24  extent funds are available, to provide statewide support,
25  professional development, and technical assistance to school
26  districts in relation to:

 

 

  SB1672 - 4 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 5 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 5 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 5 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  (1) the administration of universal screeners for a
2  risk of reading difficulties and secondary reviews;
3  (2) analyzing and interpreting data therefrom;
4  (3) providing intervention in accordance with Sections
5  10-20.53a and 34-18.45a; and
6  (4) dyslexia.
7  (h) The State Board of Education shall adopt any rules
8  necessary to ensure that a student receives intervention under
9  Section 10-20.53a or 34-18.45a.
10  (Source: P.A. 102-539, eff. 8-20-21.)
11  (105 ILCS 5/10-20.53a new)
12  Sec. 10-20.53a. Early literacy screening and support.
13  (a) As used in this Section:
14  "Secondary review" means a process, as determined by a
15  school district, for gathering additional information to
16  determine if risk factors for reading difficulties, including
17  dyslexia, are present.
18  "Universal screener" means a tool that is used to predict
19  which students may be at risk for poor learning outcomes,
20  including a risk for reading difficulties, and is typically
21  brief, valid, and reliable and conducted with all students at
22  a particular grade level.
23  (b) Beginning with the 2025-2026 school year, each school
24  district must screen students, no less than twice each school
25  year, in grades kindergarten through 3 for a risk of reading

 

 

  SB1672 - 5 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 6 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 6 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 6 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  difficulties, including dyslexia, using a universal screener
2  approved by the State Board of Education.
3  (c) If a universal screener administered under subsection
4  (b) indicates that a student may be at risk or at some risk for
5  reading difficulties, including dyslexia, the school district
6  must conduct a secondary review of the student within the
7  district's multi-tiered system of support framework. Through
8  the secondary review conducted by the multi-tiered system of
9  support team, the school district must gather additional
10  information to determine if the student has risk factors for
11  reading difficulties, including dyslexia. The purpose of the
12  secondary review is only to determine the need for
13  intervention through the school district's multi-tiered system
14  of support framework, not to indicate a need to initiate an
15  evaluation for special education. The additional information
16  may include, but is not limited to, information from progress
17  monitoring data, work samples, and teacher input.
18  For any student who is an English learner, the school's or
19  school district's English learner team must be included in the
20  secondary review of the student. The additional information
21  gathered through the secondary review for a student who is an
22  English learner may also include, but is not limited to,
23  information from any home language survey, information from
24  any State English language proficiency screener or assessment,
25  and information regarding previous educational experiences
26  inside or outside of the United States.

 

 

  SB1672 - 6 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 7 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 7 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 7 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  (d) If the secondary review indicates that a student has
2  risk factors for reading difficulties, including dyslexia, the
3  school must use a multi-tiered system of support framework to
4  address the needs of the student.
5  (e) If a student's secondary review indicates that the
6  student has risk factors for reading difficulties, the school
7  district must notify the student's parent or guardian.
8  (f) If a student's secondary review indicates that the
9  student has risk factors for reading difficulties, including
10  dyslexia, the school or school district must provide the
11  student with intervention that aligns with the components of
12  effective structured literacy instruction, as outlined in the
13  State Board of Education's handbook under subsection (c) of
14  Section 2-3.161, and that:
15  (1) includes the teaching of phoneme awareness,
16  phoneme-grapheme correspondences, orthography,
17  morphology, syntax, and semantics;
18  (2) incorporates multimodal, hands-on practice and
19  intensive instruction with additional time, repeated
20  exposures, and practice;
21  (3) uses decodable texts that align with phonics
22  instruction for scaffolded learning;
23  (4) encourages orthographic mapping for automatic word
24  recognition;
25  (5) uses explicit instruction that is direct,
26  unambiguous teaching with modeling, scaffolding, and

 

 

  SB1672 - 7 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 8 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 8 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 8 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  quality feedback;
2  (6) ensures systematic and cumulative instruction with
3  structured sequence building from simple to complex, with
4  prerequisite skills taught first;
5  (7) uses diagnostic teaching, with adjustments based
6  on frequent assessment and progress monitoring; and
7  (8) is delivered by a highly skilled teacher or
8  teachers who understand individual needs and the reading
9  process.
10  Within a multi-tiered system of support framework, the
11  frequency and intensity of the intervention under this Section
12  shall meet the individual needs of the student.
13  (g) On or before July 1, 2026, and on or before each July 1
14  thereafter, each school district must report to the State
15  Board of Education the following information with respect to
16  the previous school year:
17  (1) the universal screeners and the interventions that
18  were used by the school district under this Section;
19  (2) the number of students who were administered a
20  universal screener under this Section;
21  (3) the number of students who were determined to be
22  at risk or at some risk for reading difficulties under
23  this Section; and
24  (4) the number of students who received intervention
25  under this Section.
26  The State Board of Education shall publish the information

 

 

  SB1672 - 8 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 9 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 9 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 9 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  collected from the report on its Internet website.
2  (105 ILCS 5/34-18.45a new)
3  Sec. 34-18.45a. Early literacy screening and support.
4  (a) As used in this Section:
5  "Secondary review" means a process, as determined by the
6  school district, for gathering additional information to
7  determine if risk factors for reading difficulties, including
8  dyslexia, are present.
9  "Universal screener" means a tool that is used to predict
10  which students may be at risk for poor learning outcomes,
11  including a risk for reading difficulties, and is typically
12  brief, valid, and reliable and conducted with all students at
13  a particular grade level.
14  (b) Beginning with the 2025-2026 school year, the school
15  district must screen students, no less than twice each school
16  year, in grades kindergarten through 3 for a risk of reading
17  difficulties, including dyslexia, using a universal screener
18  approved by the State Board of Education.
19  (c) If a universal screener administered under subsection
20  (b) indicates that a student may be at risk or at some risk for
21  reading difficulties, including dyslexia, the school district
22  must conduct a secondary review of the student within the
23  district's multi-tiered system of support framework. Through
24  the secondary review conducted by the multi-tiered system of
25  support team, the school district must gather additional

 

 

  SB1672 - 9 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 10 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 10 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 10 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  information to determine if the student has risk factors for
2  reading difficulties, including dyslexia. The purpose of the
3  secondary review is only to determine the need for
4  intervention through the school district's multi-tiered system
5  of support framework, not to indicate a need to initiate an
6  evaluation for special education. The additional information
7  may include, but is not limited to, information from progress
8  monitoring data, work samples, and teacher input.
9  For any student who is an English learner, the school's or
10  school district's English learner team must be included in the
11  secondary review of the student. The additional information
12  gathered through the secondary review for a student who is an
13  English learner may also include, but is not limited to,
14  information from any home language survey, information from
15  any State English language proficiency screener or assessment,
16  and information regarding previous educational experiences
17  inside or outside of the United States.
18  (d) If the secondary review indicates that a student has
19  risk factors for reading difficulties, including dyslexia, the
20  school must use a multi-tiered system of support framework to
21  address the needs of the student.
22  (e) If a student's secondary review indicates that the
23  student has risk factors for reading difficulties, the school
24  district must notify the student's parent or guardian.
25  (f) If a student's secondary review indicates that the
26  student has risk factors for reading difficulties, including

 

 

  SB1672 - 10 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 11 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 11 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 11 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  dyslexia, the school or school district must provide the
2  student with intervention that aligns with the components of
3  effective structured literacy instruction, as outlined in the
4  State Board of Education's handbook under subsection (c) of
5  Section 2-3.161, and that:
6  (1) includes the teaching of phoneme awareness,
7  phoneme-grapheme correspondences, orthography,
8  morphology, syntax, and semantics;
9  (2) incorporates multimodal, hands-on practice and
10  intensive instruction with additional time, repeated
11  exposures, and practice;
12  (3) uses decodable texts that align with phonics
13  instruction for scaffolded learning;
14  (4) encourages orthographic mapping for automatic word
15  recognition;
16  (5) uses explicit instruction that is direct,
17  unambiguous teaching with modeling, scaffolding, and
18  quality feedback;
19  (6) ensures systematic and cumulative instruction with
20  structured sequence building from simple to complex, with
21  prerequisite skills taught first;
22  (7) uses diagnostic teaching, with adjustments based
23  on frequent assessment and progress monitoring; and
24  (8) is delivered by a highly skilled teacher or
25  teachers who understand individual needs and the reading
26  process.

 

 

  SB1672 - 11 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b


SB1672- 12 -LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b   SB1672 - 12 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
  SB1672 - 12 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b
1  Within a multi-tiered system of support framework, the
2  frequency and intensity of the intervention under this Section
3  shall meet the individual needs of the student.
4  (g) On or before July 1, 2026, and on or before each July 1
5  thereafter, the school district must report to the State Board
6  of Education the following information with respect to the
7  previous school year:
8  (1) the universal screeners and the interventions that
9  were used by the school district under this Section;
10  (2) the number of students who were administered a
11  universal screener under this Section;
12  (3) the number of students who were determined to be
13  at risk or at some risk for reading difficulties under
14  this Section; and
15  (4) the number of students who received intervention
16  under this Section.
17  The State Board of Education shall publish the information
18  collected from the report on its Internet website.

 

 

  SB1672 - 12 - LRB104 08071 LNS 18117 b