104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026 SB1677 Introduced 2/5/2025, by Sen. Christopher Belt SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: 105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5 Amends the Evaluation of Certified Employees Article of the School Code. Provides that a teacher evaluation plan shall prohibit an evaluator from using artificial intelligence tools to perform teacher evaluation tasks. LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b A BILL FOR 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026 SB1677 Introduced 2/5/2025, by Sen. Christopher Belt SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: 105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5 105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5 Amends the Evaluation of Certified Employees Article of the School Code. Provides that a teacher evaluation plan shall prohibit an evaluator from using artificial intelligence tools to perform teacher evaluation tasks. LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b A BILL FOR
104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026 SB1677 Introduced 2/5/2025, by Sen. Christopher Belt SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5 105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5
105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5
Amends the Evaluation of Certified Employees Article of the School Code. Provides that a teacher evaluation plan shall prohibit an evaluator from using artificial intelligence tools to perform teacher evaluation tasks.
LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
A BILL FOR
SB1677LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
1 AN ACT concerning education.
2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3 represented in the General Assembly:
4 Section 5. The School Code is amended by changing Section
5 24A-5 as follows:
6 (105 ILCS 5/24A-5) (from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5)
7 Sec. 24A-5. Content of evaluation plans. This Section does
8 not apply to teachers assigned to schools identified in an
9 agreement entered into between the board of a school district
10 operating under Article 34 of this Code and the exclusive
11 representative of the district's teachers in accordance with
12 Section 34-85c of this Code.
13 Each school district to which this Article applies shall
14 establish a teacher evaluation plan which ensures that each
15 teacher in contractual continued service is evaluated at least
16 once in the course of every 2 or 3 school years as provided in
17 this Section.
18 Each school district shall establish a teacher evaluation
19 plan that ensures that:
20 (1) each teacher not in contractual continued service
21 is evaluated at least once every school year; and
22 (2) except as otherwise provided in this Section, each
23 teacher in contractual continued service is evaluated at
104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026 SB1677 Introduced 2/5/2025, by Sen. Christopher Belt SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5 105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5
105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5
Amends the Evaluation of Certified Employees Article of the School Code. Provides that a teacher evaluation plan shall prohibit an evaluator from using artificial intelligence tools to perform teacher evaluation tasks.
LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
A BILL FOR
105 ILCS 5/24A-5 from Ch. 122, par. 24A-5
LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677- 2 -LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 - 2 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 2 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
1 least once in the course of every 2 school years. However,
2 any teacher in contractual continued service whose
3 performance is rated as either "needs improvement" or
4 "unsatisfactory" must be evaluated at least once in the
5 school year following the receipt of such rating.
6 No later than September 1, 2022, each school district must
7 establish a teacher evaluation plan that ensures that each
8 teacher in contractual continued service whose performance is
9 rated as either "excellent" or "proficient" is evaluated at
10 least once in the course of the 3 school years after receipt of
11 the rating and implement an informal teacher observation plan
12 established by agency rule and by agreement of the joint
13 committee established under subsection (b) of Section 24A-4 of
14 this Code that ensures that each teacher in contractual
15 continued service whose performance is rated as either
16 "excellent" or "proficient" is informally observed at least
17 once in the course of the 2 school years after receipt of the
18 rating.
19 For the 2022-2023 school year only, if the Governor has
20 declared a disaster due to a public health emergency pursuant
21 to Section 7 of the Illinois Emergency Management Agency Act,
22 a school district may waive the evaluation requirement of all
23 teachers in contractual continued service whose performances
24 were rated as either "excellent" or "proficient" during the
25 last school year in which the teachers were evaluated under
26 this Section.
SB1677 - 2 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677- 3 -LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 - 3 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 3 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
1 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section
2 or any other Section of this Code, a principal shall not be
3 prohibited from evaluating any teachers within a school during
4 his or her first year as principal of such school. If a
5 first-year principal exercises this option in a school
6 district where the evaluation plan provides for a teacher in
7 contractual continued service to be evaluated once in the
8 course of every 2 or 3 school years, as applicable, then a new
9 2-year or 3-year evaluation plan must be established.
10 The evaluation plan shall comply with the requirements of
11 this Section and of any rules adopted by the State Board of
12 Education pursuant to this Section.
13 The plan shall include a description of each teacher's
14 duties and responsibilities and of the standards to which that
15 teacher is expected to conform, and shall include at least the
16 following components:
17 (a) personal observation of the teacher in the
18 classroom by the evaluator, unless the teacher has no
19 classroom duties.
20 (b) consideration of the teacher's attendance,
21 planning, instructional methods, classroom management,
22 where relevant, and competency in the subject matter
23 taught.
24 (c) by no later than the applicable implementation
25 date, consideration of student growth as a significant
26 factor in the rating of the teacher's performance.
SB1677 - 3 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677- 4 -LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 - 4 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 4 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
1 (d) prior to September 1, 2012, rating of the
2 performance of teachers in contractual continued service
3 as either:
4 (i) "excellent", "satisfactory" or
5 "unsatisfactory"; or
6 (ii) "excellent", "proficient", "needs
7 improvement" or "unsatisfactory".
8 (e) on and after September 1, 2012, rating of the
9 performance of all teachers as "excellent", "proficient",
10 "needs improvement" or "unsatisfactory".
11 (f) specification as to the teacher's strengths and
12 weaknesses, with supporting reasons for the comments made.
13 (g) inclusion of a copy of the evaluation in the
14 teacher's personnel file and provision of a copy to the
15 teacher.
16 (h) within 30 school days after the completion of an
17 evaluation rating a teacher in contractual continued
18 service as "needs improvement", development by the
19 evaluator, in consultation with the teacher, and taking
20 into account the teacher's ongoing on-going professional
21 responsibilities including his or her regular teaching
22 assignments, of a professional development plan directed
23 to the areas that need improvement and any supports that
24 the district will provide to address the areas identified
25 as needing improvement.
26 (i) within 30 school days after completion of an
SB1677 - 4 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677- 5 -LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 - 5 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 5 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
1 evaluation rating a teacher in contractual continued
2 service as "unsatisfactory", development and commencement
3 by the district of a remediation plan designed to correct
4 deficiencies cited, provided the deficiencies are deemed
5 remediable. In all school districts the remediation plan
6 for unsatisfactory, tenured teachers shall provide for 90
7 school days of remediation within the classroom, unless an
8 applicable collective bargaining agreement provides for a
9 shorter duration. In all school districts evaluations
10 issued pursuant to this Section shall be issued within 10
11 days after the conclusion of the respective remediation
12 plan. However, the school board or other governing
13 authority of the district shall not lose jurisdiction to
14 discharge a teacher in the event the evaluation is not
15 issued within 10 days after the conclusion of the
16 respective remediation plan.
17 (j) participation in the remediation plan by the
18 teacher in contractual continued service rated
19 "unsatisfactory", an evaluator and a consulting teacher
20 selected by the evaluator of the teacher who was rated
21 "unsatisfactory", which consulting teacher is an
22 educational employee as defined in the Illinois
23 Educational Labor Relations Act, has at least 5 years'
24 teaching experience, and a reasonable familiarity with the
25 assignment of the teacher being evaluated, and who
26 received an "excellent" rating on his or her most recent
SB1677 - 5 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677- 6 -LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 - 6 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 6 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
1 evaluation. Where no teachers who meet these criteria are
2 available within the district, the district shall request
3 and the applicable regional office of education shall
4 supply, to participate in the remediation process, an
5 individual who meets these criteria.
6 In a district having a population of less than 500,000
7 with an exclusive bargaining agent, the bargaining agent
8 may, if it so chooses, supply a roster of qualified
9 teachers from whom the consulting teacher is to be
10 selected. That roster shall, however, contain the names of
11 at least 5 teachers, each of whom meets the criteria for
12 consulting teacher with regard to the teacher being
13 evaluated, or the names of all teachers so qualified if
14 that number is less than 5. In the event of a dispute as to
15 qualification, the State Board shall determine
16 qualification.
17 (k) a mid-point and final evaluation by an evaluator
18 during and at the end of the remediation period,
19 immediately following receipt of a remediation plan
20 provided for under subsections (i) and (j) of this
21 Section. Each evaluation shall assess the teacher's
22 performance during the time period since the prior
23 evaluation; provided that the last evaluation shall also
24 include an overall evaluation of the teacher's performance
25 during the remediation period. A written copy of the
26 evaluations and ratings, in which any deficiencies in
SB1677 - 6 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677- 7 -LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 - 7 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 7 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
1 performance and recommendations for correction are
2 identified, shall be provided to and discussed with the
3 teacher within 10 school days after the date of the
4 evaluation, unless an applicable collective bargaining
5 agreement provides to the contrary. These subsequent
6 evaluations shall be conducted by an evaluator. The
7 consulting teacher shall provide advice to the teacher
8 rated "unsatisfactory" on how to improve teaching skills
9 and to successfully complete the remediation plan. The
10 consulting teacher shall participate in developing the
11 remediation plan, but the final decision as to the
12 evaluation shall be done solely by the evaluator, unless
13 an applicable collective bargaining agreement provides to
14 the contrary. Evaluations at the conclusion of the
15 remediation process shall be separate and distinct from
16 the required annual evaluations of teachers and shall not
17 be subject to the guidelines and procedures relating to
18 those annual evaluations. The evaluator may but is not
19 required to use the forms provided for the annual
20 evaluation of teachers in the district's evaluation plan.
21 (l) reinstatement to the evaluation schedule set forth
22 in the district's evaluation plan for any teacher in
23 contractual continued service who achieves a rating equal
24 to or better than "satisfactory" or "proficient" in the
25 school year following a rating of "needs improvement" or
26 "unsatisfactory".
SB1677 - 7 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677- 8 -LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 - 8 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 8 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
1 (m) dismissal in accordance with subsection (d) of
2 Section 24-12 or Section 24-16.5 or 34-85 of this Code of
3 any teacher who fails to complete any applicable
4 remediation plan with a rating equal to or better than a
5 "satisfactory" or "proficient" rating. Districts and
6 teachers subject to dismissal hearings are precluded from
7 compelling the testimony of consulting teachers at such
8 hearings under subsection (d) of Section 24-12 or Section
9 24-16.5 or 34-85 of this Code, either as to the rating
10 process or for opinions of performances by teachers under
11 remediation.
12 (n) After the implementation date of an evaluation
13 system for teachers in a district as specified in Section
14 24A-2.5 of this Code, if a teacher in contractual
15 continued service successfully completes a remediation
16 plan following a rating of "unsatisfactory" in an overall
17 performance evaluation received after the foregoing
18 implementation date and receives a subsequent rating of
19 "unsatisfactory" in any of the teacher's overall
20 performance evaluation ratings received during the
21 36-month period following the teacher's completion of the
22 remediation plan, then the school district may forgo
23 remediation and seek dismissal in accordance with
24 subsection (d) of Section 24-12 or Section 34-85 of this
25 Code.
26 (o) Teachers who are due to be evaluated in the last
SB1677 - 8 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677- 9 -LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 - 9 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 9 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
1 year before they are set to retire shall be offered the
2 opportunity to waive their evaluation and to retain their
3 most recent rating, unless the teacher was last rated as
4 "needs improvement" or "unsatisfactory". The school
5 district may still reserve the right to evaluate a teacher
6 provided the district gives notice to the teacher at least
7 14 days before the evaluation and a reason for evaluating
8 the teacher.
9 (p) Evaluators are prohibited from using artificial
10 intelligence tools to perform teacher evaluation tasks,
11 including, but not limited to, transcription,
12 summarization, an analysis of video, audio, text, or
13 numerical data, or the assignment of ratings.
14 Nothing in this Section or Section 24A-4 shall be
15 construed as preventing immediate dismissal of a teacher for
16 deficiencies which are deemed irremediable or for actions
17 which are injurious to or endanger the health or person of
18 students in the classroom or school, or preventing the
19 dismissal or non-renewal of teachers not in contractual
20 continued service for any reason not prohibited by applicable
21 employment, labor, and civil rights laws. Failure to strictly
22 comply with the time requirements contained in Section 24A-5
23 shall not invalidate the results of the remediation plan.
24 Nothing contained in Public Act 98-648 repeals,
25 supersedes, invalidates, or nullifies final decisions in
26 lawsuits pending on July 1, 2014 (the effective date of Public
SB1677 - 9 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677- 10 -LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b SB1677 - 10 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 10 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b
SB1677 - 10 - LRB104 11190 LNS 21272 b