Indiana House Bill HCR0006

Indiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Report Pass: 2/10/22
• Engrossed: 2/15/22
• Refer: 2/15/22
• Report Pass: 2/22/22
• Enrolled: 2/25/22
• Passed: 2/25/22

Caption

A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION urging the Indiana Department of Transportation to rename the bridge on I-65 over the Wabash River as the "Captain Ronald D. Gutwein Memorial Bridge".

Impact

The passage of HCR0006 would serve as a significant tribute to Captain Gutwein, ensuring that his contributions to the state and country are not forgotten. Renaming the bridge would also enhance awareness and appreciation for the sacrifices made by military personnel. Such memorials often foster community pride and serve as educational tools for future generations about the importance of honoring those who have served in the armed forces. This can be seen as part of a broader trend in recognizing and commemorating military service and history within local communities.

Summary

HCR0006 is a Concurrent Resolution urging the Indiana Department of Transportation to rename the bridge on I-65 over the Wabash River as the 'Captain Ronald D. Gutwein Memorial Bridge.' This bill commemorates the legacy of Captain Gutwein, a veteran recognized for his distinguished military service and his contributions as a pilot during and after the Vietnam War. The resolution emphasizes the courage and valor of Captain Gutwein, highlighting his multiple awards for bravery during combat operations and his later service as an aviation safety consultant.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HCR0006 appears to be largely positive and supportive among legislators and the public. The resolution was favorably reported out of committee with unanimous votes, indicating strong bipartisan support and an appreciation for honoring local heroes. This reflects a collective acknowledgment of the value in recognizing veterans and their impact on both local and national history. There are no recorded major oppositions or contentions noted during the discussions surrounding the bill.

Contention

Although the resolution is primarily straightforward and non-controversial, one point of contention could stem from potential discussions about the appropriateness or desire to name public infrastructure in remembrance of individuals versus using such honors for broader historical events. However, given the unanimous committee vote and lack of opposing sentiment reported, it seems this resolution was accepted without significant debate.