LEGISLATIVE SERVICES AGENCY
OFFICE OF FISCAL AND MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS
200 W. Washington St., Suite 301
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 233-0696
iga.in.gov
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
LS 6566 NOTE PREPARED: Feb 29, 2024
BILL NUMBER: HB 1121 BILL AMENDED: Feb 29, 2024
SUBJECT: Local Income Taxes.
FIRST AUTHOR: Rep. Thompson BILL STATUS: 2
nd
Reading - 2
nd
House
FIRST SPONSOR: Sen. Holdman
FUNDS AFFECTED:XGENERAL IMPACT: State & Local
DEDICATED
FEDERAL
Summary of Legislation: (Amended) LIT Councils: This bill extends the expiration of provisions
concerning a county with a single voting bloc and the allocation of votes for a local income tax (LIT) council.
Correctional Facilities LIT: This bill specifies the amount of revenue from a local income tax rate imposed
for correctional facilities and rehabilitation facilities in a county that may be used for operating expenses of
those facilities.
Acute Care Hospital LIT: This bill allows a county fiscal body to adopt a LIT rate for an acute care hospital
located in the county to be used only for the operating expenses of the acute care hospital.
LIT Allocations for Taxing Unit Merger or Consolidation: This bill provides that, for the purpose of
distributing the LIT, if two or more school corporations or civil taxing units merge or consolidate to form
a single school corporation or civil taxing unit, the school corporation or civil taxing unit is entitled to the
combined pro rata distribution of the LIT revenue allocated to each applicable school corporation or civil
taxing unit in existence on January 1 of the immediately preceding calendar year prior to the merger or
consolidation.
FIT Allocations for Taxing Unit Merger or Consolidation: This bill provides, for purposes of calculating
distributions of the financial institutions tax to local taxing units, how to calculate distributions for a taxing
unit that did not receive distributions in 2012 because the unit was subsequently established from the merger
or consolidation of two or more taxing units that received distributions from the financial institutions tax
fund in 2012.
HB 1121 1 CVET Allocations for Taxing Unit Merger or Consolidation: This bill provides, for purposes of calculating
qualified distributions of the commercial motor vehicle excise tax to local taxing units, how to calculate base
revenue distributions for a taxing unit that did not receive a base revenue distribution in 2001 because the
taxing unit was subsequently established from the merger or consolidation of two or more taxing units that
received base revenue distributions in 2001. It provides that, for purposes of determining the apportionment
or distribution of the motor vehicle excise tax, that the county auditor may make adjustments to reflect the
merger or consolidation of two or more taxing units.
Highlander Fire Protection District: This bill provides that the Department of Local Government Finance
(DLGF) shall make certain adjustments pertaining to the distribution of LIT for Floyd County in 2025, which
provide that the Highlander Fire Protection District (district) shall receive an amount equal to the combined
distribution that would have been distributed to the Greenville Fire Protection District (FPD) and the
Lafayette Fire Protection District (FPD) in 2024, but for their elimination resulting from the merger to
establish the district. The bill requires corresponding adjustments in 2025 to reduce the distribution for each
applicable civil taxing unit and school corporation in Floyd County, excluding the district, by an amount that
equals the proportionate share of the amount of LIT received in 2024 of the combined distribution that would
have been distributed to the Greenville FPD and the Lafayette FPD in 2024, but for their elimination.
City of Hammond Food and Beverage Tax: This bill authorizes the city of Hammond to impose a food and
beverage tax.
Town of Cicero Food and Beverage Tax: This bill authorizes the town of Cicero to impose a food and
beverage tax.
Perry County Special Purpose LIT: This bill provides that funds accumulated from a Perry County special
purpose LIT rate to construct or improve the county jail after the redemption of bonds issued or final
payment of lease rentals due under a lease shall be transferred to a county capital project fund to be used to
finance capital projects within Perry County. (Current law specifies that such remaining funds are to be
transferred to the county jail operations fund to be used for financing the maintenance and operations of the
Perry County detention center.)
Grant County Special Purpose LIT: This bill allows Grant County, under specified circumstances, to adopt
an ordinance to impose a special purpose LIT rate to fund and finance the construction of a county jail.
Knox County Inkeeper’s Tax: This bill authorizes Knox County to impose its innkeeper's tax at a rate of 8%
(instead of 6% under current law). It provides that, if the tax rate is increased to more than 6%, the portion
of the tax rate that exceeds 6% expires on December 31, 2045.
Effective Date: Upon passage; July 1, 2023 (retroactive); July 1, 2024; January 1, 2025.
Explanation of State Expenditures: Department of Local Government Finance (DLGF): The administrative
workload for the DLGF may increase as a result of the following:
• Computing and reporting the revised/updated revenue allocations of LIT and commercial vehicle
excise tax revenue, should two or more civil taxing units or school corporations consolidate or merge
into one unit.
• Making the applicable adjustments to the CY 2025 LIT distribution allocations to account for the
newly created Highlander Fire Protection District in Floyd County.
HB 1121 2 • Counties choosing to adopt a LIT rate for paying for acute care hospitals within their jurisdictions,
based on eligibility requirements specified in the bill.
• Grant County choosing to adopt a special purpose LIT rate to fund and finance the construction of
a county jail.
It is assumed that the DLGF will be able to implement these provisions using existing resources and not
require additional appropriations to implement this bill’s provisions.
Department of State Revenue (DOR): The administrative workload for the DOR may increase as a result of
the following:
• The city of Hammond and/or the town of Cicero implementing a food and beverage tax. (The food
and beverage taxes would be collected and remitted to the DOR in the same manner as the state Sales
Tax.)
• Counties choosing to adopt a LIT rate for paying for acute care hospitals within their jurisdictions,
based on eligibility requirements specified in the bill.
It is assumed that the DOR will be able to implement these provisions using existing resources and not
require additional appropriations to implement this bill’s provisions.
State Comptroller: The State Comptroller may experience a minor increase in administrative workload as
a result of computing and transferring to the county auditor the revised/updated revenue allocations of
financial institutions tax, should two or more civil taxing units or school corporations consolidate or merge
into one unit. It is assumed that the State Comptroller’s office will be able to implement these provisions
using existing resources and not require additional appropriations.
State Budget Agency: The State Budget Agency may experience an increase in administrative workload
should counties choose to adopt a LIT rate for paying for acute care hospitals within their jurisdictions, based
on eligibility requirements specified in the bill, and/or if Grant County chooses to adopt a special purpose
LIT rate to fund and finance the construction of a county jail. The agency’s current level of resources should
be sufficient to implement these provisions.
Explanation of State Revenues:
Explanation of Local Expenditures: LIT Councils: The bill’s provisions extend the current expiration date
by one year - from May 31, 2024, to May 31, 2025 - for those counties where the county adopting body is
the LIT council and the county has a single voting bloc. These provisions should not have any significant
impact for the local units since they’re simply extending current functions already in place.
CVET Allocations for Taxing Unit Merger or Consolidation: The administrative workload for county
auditors may increase as a result of making any necessary adjustments to the current taxing unit
apportionment and distributions of motor vehicle excise tax revenue in the county, should two or more civil
taxing units or school corporations consolidate or merge into one unit.
Acute Care Hospital LIT: The bill allows a county fiscal body to adopt an ordinance that imposes a LIT rate
for paying for acute care hospitals within their jurisdictions, based on eligibility requirements specified in
the bill. A county fiscal body should have sufficient resources to pass the required ordinance, and the county
auditor should have sufficient resources to establish and administer the specified fund.
HB 1121 3 City of Hammond Food and Beverage Tax: The Hammond city council could potentially incur a one-time
increase in costs if it holds an additional public hearing to discuss a proposed ordinance to impose a food and
beverage tax.
If the city imposes a food and beverage tax, the city fiscal officer would establish a food and beverage tax
receipts fund, in which all revenue from the tax would be deposited. Money in this fund may only be used
for the following purposes:
• Development related to the Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District's construction of the
West Lake Corridor Commuter Rail Project.
• Development in the city's downtown area.
• Expansion and improvement of the Hammond Sportsplex and Community Center.
• Expansion and improvement of the Pavilion at Wolf Lake Memorial Park.
• The pledge of money for bonds, leases, or other obligations incurred for a purpose listed above.
Town of Cicero Food and Beverage Tax: The Cicero town council could potentially incur a one-time increase
in costs if it holds an additional public hearing to discuss a proposed ordinance to impose a food and
beverage tax.
If the town imposes a food and beverage tax, the town fiscal officer would establish a food and beverage tax
receipts fund, in which all revenue from the tax would be deposited. Money in this fund may only be used
for the following purposes:
• To reduce the town’s property tax levy for a particular year at the discretion of the town.
• Economic development.
• To create new parks and amenities and to expand and enhance existing parks and amenities.
• To upgrade, expand, and otherwise improve the town’s water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater
utilities.
Perry County Special Purpose LIT: This bill provides that after the redemption of bonds issued or final
payment of lease rentals due under a lease, any accumulated fund balance from the Perry County special
purpose LIT shall be transferred to a county capital project fund to be used to finance capital projects within
Perry County. The county auditor should be able to create the capital projects fund (if necessary) and perform
the transfer of any excess fund balance without requiring additional resources.
Grant County Special Purpose LIT: The bill allows the county council in Grant County to adopt an ordinance
that would repeal the current special purpose LIT rate of 0.01% used to fund the Grant County Economic
Growth Council, Inc. and adopt an ordinance that imposes a special purpose LIT rate to finance, construct,
acquire, improve, renovate, and equip the county jail. The imposed rate may not exceed the lesser of 0.5%
or the rate necessary to carry out the county jail capital project. Assuming that the county council adopts an
ordinance that imposes the LIT special purpose rate, the county treasurer shall establish a county jail revenue
fund that will be used to help fund the county jail capital project. Revenue generated from this special
purpose rate shall be deposited into the county jail revenue fund. The county council should have sufficient
resources to pass the required ordinance, and the county treasurer should have sufficient resources to
establish and administer the specified fund.
Knox County Innkeeper’s Tax: The Knox County fiscal body could potentially incur a one-time increase in
costs if it holds an additional public hearing to discuss a proposed ordinance regarding the innkeeper’s tax.
HB 1121 4 If the county increases the innkeeper’s tax, the county fiscal officer may need to update the innkeeper’s tax
form and instructions. The county fiscal body and fiscal officer should be able to implement the bill’s
provisions within existing levels of staff and resources.
Explanation of Local Revenues: Correctional Facilities LIT: The bill’s provisions clarify the percentage
of revenue generated from a county’s LIT rate imposed for correctional facilities and rehabilitation facilities
in a county that may be used for operating expenses of those facilities. Under current law, the amount of a
county’s correctional facilities LIT revenue that can be used towards operating expenses is equal to the
amount of revenue attributable to 0.2% of the tax rate. Under this bill’s provisions, if an increment of the tax
rate does not exceed 0.2%, 100% of the revenue collected from the total tax rate can be used towards
operating expenses. This bill’s provisions will allow those counties that impose a LIT rate for correctional
and rehabilitation facilities to use more of the revenue generated from the rate towards operational costs at
these facilities (as opposed to capital construction costs and debt costs associated with the construction of
the facilities).
The Appendix A table shown at the end of this fiscal note provides a list of counties that have imposed a LIT
rate in CY 2024 for correctional and rehabilitation facilities. The table also includes the CY 2024 certified
distributions amounts, certified rates, and estimated amounts of revenue that could be used toward operating
expenses under the current statute (Baseline) and under this bill’s provisions (Policy). A difference (between
Policy vs. Baseline amounts) column is also included.
Acute Care Hospital LIT: Under this bill’s provisions, counties may choose to adopt a LIT rate for paying
for acute care hospitals within their jurisdictions, based on eligibility requirements specified in the bill. The
adopted tax rate must be in increments of 0.01% and may not exceed 0.10%. The revenue attributable to the
rate is distributed to the county unit and must be maintained in a separate dedicated county fund and used
only for the purposes of covering operating expenses related to acute care hospitals in the county.
Should counties choose to adopt a LIT rate for the purpose previously noted, the county unit could receive
their first certified distribution of this revenue in CY 2025 if the county fiscal body passes an ordinance
before November 1, 2024. The Appendix B table at the end of the fiscal note contains CY 2025 and CY 2026
revenue estimates for each 0.1% of a rate a county may impose. Ultimately, the fiscal impact depends on
local decisions.
LIT, FIT, and CVET Allocations for Taxing Unit Merger or Consolidation: These provisions should have
a neutral impact on total overall LIT, financial institutions tax, and commercial and motor vehicle excise tax
revenues in a county where two or more civil taxing units or school corporations have merged or
consolidated. The allocations of these revenues to certain taxing units will be revised so that the pro rata
distribution to the applicable taxing units (pre-merger or pre-consolidation) is combined and distributed to
the newly merged or consolidated taxing unit. This bill’s provisions would eliminate the potential of any re-
distribution of these revenues to the other taxing units in the county that may occur in the first year
immediately following the creation of the newly merged or consolidated taxing unit.
Highlander Fire Protection District: This bill’s provisions set the local income tax distributions effective
CY 2025 - inclusive of any future supplemental distributions - for the newly created Highlander Fire
Protection District that would have originally been allocated to the Greenville Township Fire Protection
District and Lafayette Township Fire Protection District in Floyd County prior to the merger.
City of Hammond Food and Beverage Tax: The bill authorizes the city of Hammond to impose a food and
HB 1121 5 beverage tax at a rate not to exceed 1% of gross retail income from food and beverage transactions in the city.
If the city adopts an ordinance to impose the tax in July 2024, the tax could go into effect as early as
September 1, 2024. The following table shows the estimated potential revenue for CY 2024 through CY
2026.
Estimated Potential Hammond Food and Beverage Tax Revenue, 1%
CY 2024 CY 2025 CY 2026
$242,000 $975,000 $984,000
These estimates are based on sales data for the food services industry in Lake County, as published in the
2017 Economic Census, and actual revenue of counties that currently collect food and beverage taxes. A
portion of the county total was allocated to Hammond based on the city’s estimated share of the food and
beverage industry in the county. The Hammond food and beverage tax would expire on July 1, 2047.
Town of Cicero Food and Beverage Tax: The bill authorizes the town of Cicero to impose a food and
beverage tax at a rate not to exceed 1% of gross retail income from food and beverage transactions in the
town. If the town adopts an ordinance to impose the tax in July 2024, the tax could go into effect as early as
September 1, 2024. The following table shows the estimated potential revenue for CY 2024 through CY
2026.
Estimated Potential Cicero Food and Beverage Tax Revenue, 1%
CY 2024 CY 2025 CY 2026
$43,000 $172,000 $176,000
These estimates are based on the actual food and beverage tax revenue of Hamilton County. A portion of the
county total was allocated to Cicero based on the town’s estimated share of the food and beverage industry
in the county. The Cicero food and beverage tax would expire on July 1, 2046.
Grant County Special Purpose LIT: Under this bill’s provisions, the county council in Grant County may
adopt an ordinance that imposes a special purpose LIT rate to finance, construct, acquire, improve, renovate,
and equip the county jail, assuming that it first repeals its current special purpose LIT rate of 0.01% used to
fund the Grant County Economic Growth Council. The adopted tax rate may not exceed the lesser of 0.5%
or the rate necessary to carry out the county jail capital project. The revenue attributable to the rate is
distributed to the county unit and must be maintained in a separate dedicated county jail revenue fund and
used only for the purposes of covering costs related to the county jail capital project.
Should the county council choose to adopt a LIT rate for the purpose previously noted, the county unit could
receive their first certified distribution of this revenue in CY 2025 if the council passes an ordinance before
November 1, 2024. It is estimated that a LIT rate of 0.5% in Grant County could generate approximately $7.1
M in CY 2025 and approximately $7.3 M in CY 2026. Ultimately, the fiscal impact depends on the decision
of the county council.
Knox County Innkeeper’s Tax: The bill authorizes the county fiscal body to increase the innkeeper’s tax rate
to 8%, but the innkeeper’s tax may not exceed 7% under specified conditions. Assuming the maximum tax
HB 1121 6 rate allowed, the estimated revenue increase for Knox County is $0.19 M in CY 2025 and $0.19 M in CY
2026. Additional revenue could also be collected in CY 2024, depending on when the rate increase goes into
effect. [The estimation assumes inelastic demand under the innkeeper’s tax rate change.]
Additional Information - Acute Care Hospital LIT: The bill does not increase the maximum possible local
income tax expenditure rate. The county rate established in the bill is a dedicated use of the existing
expenditure rate capacity. The maximum expenditure rate for all counties other than Marion County is 2.5%.
The maximum rate for Marion County is 2.75%. If a county fiscal body imposes this rate, it will reduce the
rate capacity of the county's adopting body. In the Appendix B table, counties that are listed as “N/A” under
the CY 2025 and CY 2026 column are excluded from the analysis since they do not contain an acute care
hospital that meets the criteria defined in the bill.
Highlander Fire Protection District: The Highlander Fire Protection District was established via an
ordinance approved by the Floyd County commissioners on December 30, 2022. The newly created district
was the result of a merger between the Greenville Township Fire Protection District and the Lafayette
Township Fire Protection District and is to become fully operational on January 1, 2024. The Highlander Fire
Protection District adopted a total property tax levy of approximately $3 M for CY 2024. However, the newly
created Highlander Fire Protection District did not receive a levy in CY 2023 and therefore did not have a
base for which to calculate CY 2024 LIT distributions. The CY 2024 LIT distributions that would have been
allocated to the Greenville Township Fire Protection District in the amount of $462,687 and to the Lafayette
Township Fire Protection District in the amount of $489,435 were instead allocated to the other taxing units
in Floyd County. These CY 2024 distributions will be added as an adjustment for the Highlander Fire
Protection District when the DLGF calculates the LIT distribution allocations for CY 2025.
State Agencies Affected: Department of State Revenue; Department of Local Government Finance; State
Budget Agency; State Comptroller.
Local Agencies Affected: County fiscal bodies and local income tax councils; County auditors; Civil taxing
units and school corporations; City of Hammond; Town of Cicero; Grant County; Knox County; Perry
County.
Information Sources: State Budget Agency Estimated CY 2024 Certified Distributions (Certified November
28, 2023): https://www.in.gov/sba/files/2024-Certification-Calculations-2.pdf. ; CY 2024 Certified Local
Income Tax Distributions - Unit Allocations as November 29, 2023; Gateway for Local Government Units -
Budget Application: Highland Fire District CY 2024 Budget Form 4; Indiana Department of Health Licensed
Hospital Report - July 2023; U.S. Census Bureau; 2017 Economic Census. Legislative Services Agency,
Indiana Handbook of Taxes, Revenues, and Appropriations, FY 2023. OFMA Quarterly Census of
Employment and Wages Data.
Fiscal Analyst: James Johnson, 317-232-9869; Bob Sigalow, 317-232-9859; Karen Rossen, 317-234-2106;
Qian Li, 317-232-967.
HB 1121 7 Appendix A: CY 2024 Local Income Tax: Correctional Facilities Distributions Amounts & Rates
County Certified
Distributions
Certified RateBaseline: Allowable
Amount for Operating
Expenses
Policy: Allowable
Amount for Operating
Expenses
Difference:
Policy vs.
Baseline
Allen $16,294,833 0.1100% $3,585 $16,294,833 $16,291,248
Bartholomew $5,938,249 0.2000% $2,375 $5,938,249 $5,935,874
Boone $8,986,228 0.2000% $3,594 $8,986,228 $8,982,634
Carroll $1,126,768 0.2000% $451 $1,126,768 $1,126,317
Cass $1,700,561 0.2000% $680 $1,700,561 $1,699,881
Clinton $1,607,429 0.2000% $643 $1,607,429 $1,606,786
Dearborn $3,090,722 0.2000% $1,236 $3,090,722 $3,089,486
DeKalb $2,042,601 0.1300% $531 $2,042,601 $2,042,070
Dubois $3,288,224 0.2000% $1,315 $3,288,224 $3,286,909
Fayette $926,083 0.2000% $370 $926,083 $925,713
Floyd $5,850,783 0.2000% $2,340 $5,850,783 $5,848,443
Fulton $1,019,815 0.2000% $408 $1,019,815 $1,019,407
Gibson $2,161,342 0.2000% $865 $2,161,342 $2,160,477
Greene $1,523,400 0.2000% $609 $1,523,400 $1,522,791
Hancock $6,085,164 0.2000% $2,434 $6,085,164 $6,082,730
Hendricks $13,614,448 0.2000% $5,446 $13,614,448 $13,609,003
Henry $2,252,765 0.2000% $901 $2,252,765 $2,251,864
Howard $4,447,663 0.2000% $1,779 $4,447,663 $4,445,884
Huntington $2,215,414 0.2000% $886 $2,215,414 $2,214,528
Jackson $2,357,877 0.2000% $943 $2,357,877 $2,356,934
Jefferson $2,594,555 0.3000% $1,557 $1,729,703 $1,728,147
Johnson $11,830,592 0.2000% $4,732 $11,830,592 $11,825,860
Knox $1,967,254 0.2000% $787 $1,967,254 $1,966,467
Madison $6,282,278 0.2000% $2,513 $6,282,278 $6,279,765
Monroe $424,260 0.0100% $8 $424,260 $424,252
Morgan $860,433 0.0400% $69 $860,433 $860,364
Owen $985,717 0.2000% $394 $985,717 $985,323
Putnam $1,870,558 0.2000% $748 $1,870,558 $1,869,810
Ripley $1,676,952 0.2000% $671 $1,676,952 $1,676,281
Sullivan $952,188 0.2000% $381 $952,188 $951,807
Vanderburgh $2,726,363 0.0500% $273 $2,726,363 $2,726,091
Vigo $5,265,507 0.2000% $2,106 $5,265,507 $5,263,401
Wabash $1,956,048 0.2000% $782 $1,956,048 $1,955,266
Wells $614,635 0.0700% $86 $614,635 $614,549
Whitley $2,300,473 0.2000% $920 $2,300,473 $2,299,553
HB 1121 8 Appendix B: Estimated Local Income Tax Revenue from a 0.1% LIT Rate ($M)*
CY 2025 CY 2026 CY 2025 CY 2026
Adams $1.080 $1.115 Lawrence N/A N/A
Allen N/A N/A Madison N/A N/A
Bartholomew $3.115 $3.222 Marion $31.133 $31.770
Benton N/A N/A Marshall N/A N/A
Blackford N/A N/A Martin N/A N/A
Boone $4.907 $5.210 Miami N/A N/A
Brown N/A N/A Monroe N/A N/A
Carroll N/A N/A Montgomery N/A N/A
Cass $0.874 $0.894 Morgan N/A N/A
Clark N/A N/A Newton N/A N/A
Clay N/A N/A Noble N/A N/A
Clinton N/A N/A Ohio N/A N/A
Crawford N/A N/A Orange N/A N/A
Daviess $1.001 $1.041 Owen N/A N/A
Dearborn N/A N/A Parke N/A N/A
Decatur $0.742 $0.766 Perry $0.500 $0.520
DeKalb N/A N/A Pike N/A N/A
Delaware N/A N/A Porter N/A N/A
Dubois N/A N/A Posey N/A N/A
Elkhart N/A N/A Pulaski N/A N/A
Fayette N/A N/A Putnam $0.964 $1.004
Floyd N/A N/A Randolph N/A N/A
Fountain N/A N/A Ripley N/A N/A
Franklin N/A N/A Rush $0.484 $0.505
Fulton $0.524 $0.540 St. Joseph N/A N/A
Gibson N/A N/A Scott N/A N/A
Grant N/A N/A Shelby $1.312 $1.346
Greene $0.780 $0.803 Spencer N/A N/A
Hamilton $26.406 $28.381 Starke N/A N/A
Hancock $3.291 $3.477 Steuben N/A N/A
Harrison $1.164 $1.214 Sullivan $0.504 $0.524
Hendricks $7.412 $7.863 Switzerland N/A N/A
Henry $1.151 $1.189 Tippecanoe N/A N/A
Howard N/A N/A Tipton $0.452 $0.466
Huntington N/A N/A Union N/A N/A
Jackson N/A N/A Vanderburgh N/A N/A
Jasper N/A N/A Vermillion N/A N/A
Jay N/A N/A Vigo N/A N/A
Jefferson N/A N/A Wabash N/A N/A
Jennings N/A N/A Warren N/A N/A
Johnson $6.454 $6.834 Warrick N/A N/A
Knox $1.018 $1.039 Washington N/A N/A
Kosciusko N/A N/A Wayne N/A N/A
HB 1121 9 LaGrange N/A N/A Wells N/A N/A
Lake N/A N/A White N/A N/A
LaPorte N/A N/A Whitley N/A N/A
* A county may impose a rate of up to 0.10% for paying for costs pertaining to acute care hospitals that are:
(1) established and operated under IC16-22-2,IC16-22-8, or IC 16-23; and (2) licensed under IC 16-21.
HB 1121 10