Changing the name of the Larned correctional mental health facility to the Larned state correctional facility and removing references to facilities that no longer exist.
The changes introduced by HB 2214 may contribute to clearer communication regarding the state's correctional facilities. By updating the nomenclature surrounding these institutions, the legislation aims to eliminate confusion and provide an accurate representation of existing facilities. This clarity is essential for both legal documents and operational guidelines within the Department of Corrections. The repeal of outdated references helps streamline the Department's operations and improve its public-facing documents.
House Bill 2214 focuses on amendments to the names and references of correctional institutions in Kansas. Specifically, it changes the name of the Larned correctional mental health facility to the Larned state correctional facility and repeals references to facilities that are no longer in existence. This bill affects how the state's correctional facilities are categorized and named in legal terms, updating language to reflect current operational realities.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 2214 is primarily neutral. There have been no significant public controversies raised against the bill, and its primary purpose is administrative rather than a matter of contentious policy. However, support may be underscored by a commitment to modernizing the state’s correctional system and aligning it with current practices. The amendment seems to serve a practical purpose, and therefore, enjoys bipartisan support within the legislature.
Notable points of contention regarding HB 2214 are minimal given its straightforward amendments and administrative nature. However, discussions may arise surrounding the naming of facilities, particularly regarding the perceived implications of changing the name of a mental health facility. Some stakeholders may argue that the new designation downplays the mental health aspects of corrections, yet generally, the bill has moved forward with legal efficiencies in mind without fostering significant debate.