Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2225 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
February 8, 2023 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Leo Delperdang, Chairperson 
House Committee on Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 582-N 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Representative Delperdang: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for HB 2225 by House Committee on Energy, Utilities and 
Telecommunications 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning HB 2225 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 HB 2225 would prohibit electrical utilities from recovering costs associated with 
transmission facilities constructed as a result of such utility’s internal or local planning processes.  
The bill would only allow the recovery of transmission related costs if such facilities were 
constructed due to a directive from a regional transmission organization or independent system 
operator that is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.  The bill would only 
apply to electrical utility companies that are under the jurisdiction of the Kansas Corporation 
Commission. 
 
Estimated State Fiscal Effect 
 	FY 2023 
SGF 
FY 2023 
All Funds 
FY 2024 
SGF 
FY 2024 
All Funds 
Revenue 	-- -- -- -- 
Expenditure 	-- 40,000 -- 40,000 
FTE Pos. 	-- -- -- -- 
 
 The Citizens’ Utility Ratepayer Board indicates that enactment of HB 2225 would increase 
the agency’s involvement in utility rate cases, resulting in $40,000 of additional expenditures from 
the agency fee fund in FY 2023, FY 2024, and all subsequent fiscal years.  These expenditures 
would be made to retain expert consultants to evaluate the recoverability of transmission related  The Honorable Leo Delperdang, Chairperson 
Page 2—HB 2225 
 
 
costs and analyze the impact of such costs on consumers’ utility rates.  This estimate assumes that 
the additional consulting fees would total $60,000 per rate case and that the agency would 
intervene in one rate case every 18 months, on average. 
 
 According to the Kansas Corporation Commission, enactment of HB 2225 would not have 
a fiscal effect on agency operations.  Any fiscal effect associated with HB 2225 is not reflected in 
The FY 2024 Governor’s Budget Report.  
 
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
 
cc: Peter Barstad, Kansas Corporation Commission 
 Shonda Rabb, Citizens Utility Ratepayer Board