Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2225 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    SESSION OF 2023
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON HOUSE BILL NO. 2225
As Recommended by House Committee on 
Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications
Brief*
HB 2225 would amend law authorizing a Kansas 
Corporation Commission (KCC)-regulated utility to cover 
costs associated with the transmission of electric power 
through a transmission delivery charge (TDC).
[Note: The bill would only apply to electrical utility 
companies that are under KCC jurisdiction.]
Approval Requirements
The bill would state that for-profit, investor-owned 
electric utilities serving more than 20,000 customers in the 
state may only recover transmission-related costs through 
TDCs when the transmission facility is constructed as a result 
of a notice or directive to construct from a regional 
transmission organization (RTO) or independent system 
operator that is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (FERC) or its successor agency.
[Note: Kansas is a member of the Southwest Power 
Pool (SPP), which is an RTO.]
Internal or Local Planning Processes
The bill would state that for-profit, investor-owned 
electric utilities could not recover costs through a TDC when 
____________________
*Supplemental notes are prepared by the Legislative Research 
Department and do not express legislative intent. The supplemental 
note and fiscal note for this bill may be accessed on the Internet at 
http://www.kslegislature.org those costs are associated with construction performed as a 
result of the utility’s internal or local planning processes 
without the notice or directive from a FERC-regulated entity, 
as stated above.
The bill would require, on July 1, 2023, that if a utility is 
recovering transmission-related costs associated with the 
utility’s internal or local planning processes, the utility must 
file a revision to the utility’s TDC with the KCC within 90 days 
to no longer include such costs. The KCC would have within 
240 days of receipt of the utility’s request for revision to 
remove the costs from the TDC and include such costs as a 
component of such utility’s rate base.
Background
The bill was introduced by the House Committee on 
Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications at the request of a 
representative of the KCC.
House Committee on Energy, Utilities and 
Telecommunications
Proponent Testimony
In the House Committee hearing on February 14, 2023, 
representatives of Americans for Prosperity-Kansas, Kansas 
Chamber, KCC, and Kansans for Lower Electric Rates 
testified as proponents, stating the bill would allow the KCC 
more control and oversight of development in Kansas, which 
would help protect ratepayers and improve regional rate 
competitiveness.
Written-only proponent testimony was provided by a 
representative of the Kansas Agribusiness Retailers 
Association, Kansas Grain and Feed Association, and Renew 
Kansas Biofuels Association.
2- 2225 Neutral Testimony
Written-only neutral testimony was provided by a 
representative of the Citizens’ Utility Ratepayer Board 
(CURB).
Opponent Testimony
Opponent testimony was provided by a representative 
of Evergy, stating the bill is regressive regulatory policy in its 
current form. Repealing the TDC would prevent Evergy from 
immediately passing on any savings or decreases from the 
charge until the next rate case and would cause an increase 
in rate cases that would negatively impact customers.
No other testimony was provided.
Fiscal Information 
According to the fiscal note prepared by the Division of 
the Budget on the bill, CURB indicates that enactment of the 
bill would result in $40,000 of additional expenditures from 
the agency fee fund in FY 2023 and all subsequent fiscal 
years. The expenditures would be made to retain expert 
consultants to evaluate the recoverability of transmission-
related costs and analyze the impact of such costs on 
consumers’ utility rates. This estimate assumes that the 
additional consulting fees would total $60,000 per rate case 
and that the agency would intervene in one rate case every 
18 months, on average.
According to the Kansas Corporation Commission, 
enactment of the bill would not have a fiscal effect on agency 
operations. 
Any fiscal effect associated with enactment of the bill is 
not reflected in The FY 2024 Governor’s Budget Report.
3- 2225 Transmission delivery charge; Kansas Corporation Commission; investor-owned 
electric utility; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; regional transmission 
organization; Southwest Power Pool; cost of recovery of transmission-related costs; 
transmission facilities
4- 2225