Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2379 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
February 28, 2023 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Fred Patton, Chairperson 
House Committee on Judiciary 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 582-N 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Representative Patton: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for HB 2379 by House Committee on Judiciary 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning HB 2379 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 HB 2379 would amend current law by removing provisions that prohibit the court from 
entering a protection from abuse order against the plaintiff, unless the defendant properly files a 
written cross or counter petition seeking a protection order; the plaintiff had reasonable notice of 
the cross or counter petition by personal service; and the court made specific findings of abuse 
against both the plaintiff and defendant that both parties acted primarily as aggressors and neither 
party acted in self-defense. The bill would specify if a court issues an order, the court would also 
issue an order restraining the plaintiff from abusing, molesting, or interfering with the privacy or 
rights of the defendant.  The order would be required to state that if the order is violated, the 
violation may constitute violation of a protective order.  
 
 The bill would also specify that if the court issues an order, the court would also issue an 
order restraining the plaintiff from harassing, telephoning, contacting, or communicating with the 
defendant.  The order would be required to state that if the order is violated, the violation may 
constitute violation of a protective order.   
 
 The Office of Judicial Administration states enactment of HB 2379 could increase the 
number of cases filed in district court because the bill’s provisions expand the number of people 
who may commit a crime, which would increase the time spent by judges and court employees 
processing and hearing cases.  Since a portion of the crime carries a misdemeanor penalty, there 
could be additional supervision of offenders required to be performed by court service officers.  
The Office estimates that enactment of the bill could result in the collection of supervision fees, 
docket fees, and fines in those cases filed under the bill’s provisions, which could be credited to  The Honorable Fred Patton, Chairperson 
Page 2—HB 2379 
 
 
the State General Fund.  According to the Office, a fiscal effect cannot be estimated until the 
Judicial Branch has had an opportunity to operate under the bill’s provisions.  Any fiscal effect 
associated with HB 2379 is not reflected in The FY 2024 Governor’s Budget Report.  
 
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
cc: Vicki Jacobsen, Judiciary