Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2492 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam C. Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
January 29, 2024 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Brenda Landwehr, Chairperson 
House Committee on Health and Human Services 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 112-N 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Representative Landwehr: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for HB 2492 by Representative Murphy, et al. 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning HB 2492 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 HB 2492 would prohibit abortion and attempts of abortion in the State of Kansas except 
when necessary to preserve the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency. The bill would 
define “abortion” to mean the use or prescription of any instrument, medicine, drug or any other 
substance or device to terminate the pregnancy of a woman with an intention to cause the 
premature termination of the pregnancy knowing that such termination will with reasonable 
likelihood cause the death of the unborn child. The bill also includes details on what is not included 
in this definition, provides related definitions, and provides details on allowable medical 
emergencies.  The bill would update related statutory references and definitions to conform with 
new definitions. 
 
 The bill would allow civil actions to be filed against individuals who violate the provisions 
of the bill and those who knowingly engage in conduct that aids or abets a violation.  The bill 
would detail all requirements, damages, awards, and defenses related to any civil action filed.   
 
Estimated State Fiscal Effect 
 	FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 
Expenditures    
   State General Fund  	-- $2,940,289 $3,528,347 
   Fee Fund(s) 	-- 	-- 	-- 
   Federal Fund 	-- 	-- 	-- 
      Total Expenditures 	-- 	-- 	-- 
Revenues    
   State General Fund  	-- 	-- 	-- 
   Fee Fund(s) 	-- 	-- 	-- 
   Federal Fund 	-- ($2,940,289) ($3,528,347) 
      Total Revenues 	-- 	-- 	-- 
FTE Positions 	-- (4.63) (4.63)  The Honorable Brenda Landwehr, Chairperson 
Page 2—HB 2492 
 
 
 
 The Kansas Department of Health and Environment indicates that passage of HB 2492 
could potentially result in the loss of federal Title X funding totaling $2.9 million in FY 2025 and 
$3.5 million in FY 2026. This would also result in the reduction of 4.63 FTE positions that are 
funded with the federal revenue.  Title X is a federal program under the U.S. Department of Health 
and Human Services that provides family planning and reproductive health services to individuals 
regardless of income.  Family planning includes a broad range of services related to achieving 
pregnancy, preventing pregnancy, and assisting women, men, and couples with achieving their 
desired number and spacing of children in a client-centered trauma-informed clinic, generally 
housed in local health departments.  The agency reports that for many clients, Title X clinics are 
their only ongoing source of health care and education. Currently, Title X serves about 13,000 
clients across Kansas annually who seek services for contraceptive care, STD/STI screenings and 
treatment, cancer screenings, basic infertility services, and more.  
 
 The agency notes that legislation similar to HB 2492 passed in Oklahoma and Texas and 
resulted in the removal of federal Title X funding in those states after it was determined that 
programmatic requirements of abortion counseling and referrals could not be made. Further 
impact would be non-renewal of the competing five-year grant and loss of access to 340B reduced 
prescription costs.  If federal funding was terminated the agency would require state funding in the 
same amount of the previous federal funding to continue services. If the five-year grant was not 
renewed, the state funding would be needed in future years as well and would need to take into 
account the rising costs of pharmaceuticals, lab fees, and other services.  County health 
departments and rural communities are currently required to maintain a 40.0 percent match to the 
federal dollars supplied by the Title X grant. Without these funds, they would be required to fully 
fund the same services offered in addition to the increase in pharmaceutical costs from losing 340B 
status.  This would likely result in many counties being unable to continue to provide adequate 
services.  The agency states that many rural areas are already experiencing shortages in health care 
providers and services and believes this would increase the burden onto neighboring cities and 
county resources to accommodate patients from farther distances. 
 
 The Kansas State Board of Healing Arts reports that the number of healthcare professionals 
providing abortion services remains generally low as a percentage of total licensees.  The agency 
does not anticipate that passage of HB 2492 would generate a large number of complaints resulting 
in investigations.  The agency indicates any resulting impact from passage of the bill should be 
able to be absorbed within existing resources.   
 
 The Office of Judicial Administration states enactment of HB 2492 could increase the 
number of cases filed in district courts because it allows for civil actions to be filed for any alleged 
violations. This could result in more time spent by court employees and judges processing, 
researching, and hearing these cases.  The Office estimates enactment of the bill could result in the 
collection of docket fees and fines assessed in those cases filed under the bill’s provisions, which 
would be deposited to the State General Fund.  The bill would not affect other revenues to the 
Judicial Branch.  According to the Office, a fiscal effect cannot be estimated.   
 
 
  The Honorable Brenda Landwehr, Chairperson 
Page 3—HB 2492 
 
 
 The Department of Revenue reports the bill would replace references to definitions within 
KSA 65-3701 but would not have any fiscal effect on agency operations. The Office of the Kansas 
Attorney General states the office would not be investigating or prosecuting violators of the Act 
and does not anticipate any fiscal effect on the agency.  Any fiscal effect associated with HB 2492 
is not reflected in The FY 2025 Governor’s Budget Report.  
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam C. Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
 
 
cc: Amy Penrod, Department of Health & Environment 
 Susan Gile, Board of Healing Arts 
 Trisha Morrow, Judiciary 
 William Hendrix, Office of the Attorney General 
 Lynn Robinson, Department of Revenue