Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2508 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam C. Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
February 14, 2024 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Adam Smith, Chairperson 
House Committee on Taxation 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 346-S 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Representative Smith: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for HB 2508 by Representative V. Miller, et al. 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning HB 2508 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 Under current law, State General Fund transfers to the Local Ad Valorem Tax Reduction 
Fund (LAVTRF) are suspended in the appropriations bill for both FY 2024 and FY 2025 and are 
capped at $54.0 million when the transfer is set to resume in FY 2026.  HB 2508 would resume 
the transfer from the State General Fund to the LAVTRF in FY 2025 and in each future fiscal year 
based on 3.63 percent of the total retail sales and compensating use taxes credited to the State 
General Fund during the preceding calendar year.  The State Treasurer would advise each county 
treasurer prior to June 1st of each year on the amount of LAVTRF moneys from the state that the 
State Treasurer estimates will be paid to each county based on population (65.0 percent) and 
valuation (35.0 percent).  The transfer from the State General Fund to the LAVTRF and the State 
Treasurer paying each county their portion of the LAVTRF would both occur on January 15th and 
July 15th of each year.  After crediting the July 15th payment, each county treasurer would credit 
each political subdivision to residential taxpayers as rebate to be reflected a credit on their next 
ensuing property tax statement.  The bill includes procedures for the county to determine the rebate 
amount.   
 
 The bill would also remove statutory references to the LAVTRF. Specifically, the 
LAVTRF would no longer be used for loan repayments if a municipality fails to repay a water or 
sewer loan from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment’s State Revolving Fund.  The 
bill would remove the ability for a municipality to use LAVTRF distributions to fund a water 
pollution control project; remove LAVTRF distributions as a factor in the State Library’s grant-
in-aid to local public libraries; and remove language that allows LAVTRF distributions to counties 
be withheld under certain circumstances.   The Honorable Adam Smith, Chairperson 
Page 2—HB 2508 
 
 
 
 HB 2508 would reduce State General Fund revenues by $130.3 million in FY 2025 by 
resuming the State General Fund transfer to the LAVTRF.  The bill would decrease State General 
Fund revenues by $74.1 million in FY 2026 by increasing the State General Fund transfer to the 
LAVTRF from $54.0 million to $128.1 million under the provisions of the bill.  The last State 
General Fund transfer to the LAVTRF occurred in FY 2003, since then transfers have routinely 
been suspended in appropriations bills.  
 
The Department of Revenue’s Property Valuation Division would be required to calculate 
and report current assessed values and distribution, as well as update related documents. The 
Department indicates that these costs are estimated to be negligible and could be absorbed within 
existing resources. 
 
The State Treasurer indicates the bill would require it to implement computer programming 
changes in order to apportion and pay amounts to counties based on population and assessed 
valuation.  The State Treasurer indicates it would be required to advise each county treasurer on 
the amount of LAVTRF moneys from the state that the State Treasurer estimates will be paid to 
each county.  The State Treasurer indicates that the administrative costs to implement the bill are 
estimated to be negligible and could be absorbed within existing resources. The amounts 
transferred to the LAVTRF would also be required to be included as expenditures in the State 
Treasurer’s budget beginning in FY 2025.   
 
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) indicates the bill would have 
no fiscal effect on the operations of the State Revolving Fund programs.  The bill removes a 
mechanism for expedited repayment of loans from municipalities that have missed a payment but 
the revenue generating streams a municipality may use for loan repayment remain in place.  
Eliminating that mechanism, which has never been used, does not threaten the financial backing 
of revenue or general obligation bonds for the State Revolving Fund programs.  State statutes retain 
use of service charges, connection fees, special assessments, property taxes, grants, or other 
sources of revenue available to the municipality to make loan repayments.   
 
KDHE indicates removing the ability for a municipality to use LAVTRF distributions to 
fund a water pollution control project would have no fiscal effect on its operations.  KDHE 
indicates that this provision was used in the early years of the Clean Water Act and associated 
construction grant program but is no longer used.  
 
The State Library indicates since the LAVTRF has not been funded in two decades, it has 
not been a factor for grant-in-aid for some time.  Removing this as a factor will not have a 
noticeable impact on the eligibility requirements.  The fiscal effect associated with HB 2508 is 
partially reflected in The FY 2025 Governor’s Budget Report, which includes resuming funding 
the LAVTRF with a $54.0 million transfer from the State General Fund under the original 
requirements of the program. 
 
The League of Kansas Municipalities and the Kansas Association of Counties indicate that 
the bill would provide additional resources for property tax relief directly to property owners.  The  The Honorable Adam Smith, Chairperson 
Page 3—HB 2508 
 
 
Kansas Association of Counties indicates the bill would increase costs to counties to implement 
the bill by unknown amounts. Counties would have programming costs to calculate the 
distribution.  
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam C. Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
 
 
cc: Lynn Robinson, Department of Revenue 
 Jay Hall, Kansas Association of Counties 
 Wendi Stark, League of Kansas Municipalities 
 John Hedges, Office of the State Treasurer 
 Amy Penrod, Department of Health & Environment 
 Ray Walling, State Library 
 Jody Allen, Board of Tax Appeals