Kansas House Bill HB2532

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/24
• Refer: 1/18/24
• Report Pass: 2/1/24
• Engrossed: 2/12/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Report Pass: 3/13/24
• Enrolled: 4/5/24
• Vetoed: 4/25/24

Caption

Regarding the distribution of the tax on parimutuel wagering on historic horse races; providing 1/3 of the amount collected shall be credited to the Kansas horse breeding development fund and 2/3 of the amount collected shall be credited to the horse fair racing benefit fund.

Impact

The bill significantly alters the distribution of tax revenue generated from parimutuel betting. Specifically, it mandates that one-third of the collected tax amount be allocated to the Kansas horse breeding development fund, while two-thirds will support the horse fair racing benefit fund. This modification aims to bolster the horse breeding industry in Kansas and provide necessary funding for activities related to horse racing and its regulatory framework. The overall intent is to promote horse racing while ensuring that state-sponsored funds are allocated effectively to benefit local equestrian activities and industry stakeholders.

Summary

House Bill 2532, concerning gaming in Kansas, specifically addresses the tax structure applied to parimutuel wagering on historical horse races and greyhound racing. The bill stipulates the rates at which tax is collected from the daily takeout of wagers placed at facilities hosting these events. For historical horse races, the bill outlines a flat tax rate of 3%, while for greyhound races, the tax varies based on the amounts wagered, illustrating a tiered approach to taxation. This structure is intended to streamline the tax obligation of racing facilities and ensure clarity in revenue collection for the state.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB2532 appears mixed, with proponents praising the bill for its clarity in tax regulations and its dual funding mechanism that supports both the breeding industry and racing benefits. Supporters argue that this approach aligns state interests with those of the racing community, fostering a more sustainable environment for horse racing in Kansas. However, some critics express concerns about the overarching impact of the tax structure, questioning whether the proposed distribution sufficiently addresses the needs of all stakeholders involved in the industry.

Contention

Notable contention arises regarding the implementation of the tax structure and whether it may disfavor certain types of racing or benefit specific stakeholders disproportionately. Concerns about the adequacy of funding for horse breeding initiatives versus racing benefits have been voiced, highlighting potential disparities that could arise from this legislative change. The debate underscores a broader conversation about balancing regulatory measures with financial sustainability within the gaming and racing sector, revealing the complexities of such legislative decisions.