Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2553 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam C. Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
February 1, 2024 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Susan Concannon, Chairperson 
House Committee on Child Welfare and Foster Care 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 152-S 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Representative Concannon: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for HB 2553 by House Committee on Child Welfare and Foster 
Care 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning HB 2553 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 HB 2553 would require law enforcement agencies to report information related to missing 
children under the custody of the Department for Children and Families (DCF) to the missing 
persons file of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) at the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation and the missing and unidentified person system (“clearinghouse”) of the Kansas 
Bureau of Investigation.  In addition, information would be required to be provided to public media 
outlets and posted to “social media platforms” by law enforcement agencies, in a manner similar 
to an Amber Alert. 
 
The bill would require DCF to obtain non-driver identification cards for any child in need 
of care and provides for certain restrictions on the handling of such identification, to include 
specific restrictions on the handling of fingerprints and photographs. The bill would require DCF 
to report information related to the human trafficking or commercial sexual exploitation of any 
child to law enforcement and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children within 24 
hours.  Additional notifications would be required by DCF for individuals or related organizations 
as specified in the bill, with an exception in case of a determination by law enforcement that such 
a notification would negatively impact a criminal investigation.  The bill would also provide for 
oversight over both law enforcement and DCF for compliance of its provisions by the Joint 
Committee on Child Welfare System Oversight. 
 
DCF indicates HB 2553 would require DCF to obtain an identification card for every child 
in foster care. The current cost of a Kansas identification card is $22.00 each and a renewal is 
needed every six years.  Based on that information along with the number of children currently in  The Honorable Susan Concannon, Chairperson 
Page 2—HB 2553 
 
 
foster care, the number of children entering care annually, and that 7.0 percent of children in out 
of home care would need a renewal after six years the table below reflects assumed costs to DCF. 
 
  FY 2026 FY 2031 
  through and Beyond 
 Item  	Number FY 2025 FY 2031 Ongoing Costs 
 
Children in foster care as of 12/31/2023 5,922  $130,284   $        --   $        --  
Children entering care annually (FY 23) 2,960 65,120   65,120  65,120  
Children in foster care needing renewals 409           --           --     8,998  
     Total   $195,404   $65,120  $74,118  
 
 Financing 
 
State General Fund   $172,835   $57,599  $65,557  
Federal Funds      22,569     7,521     8,561  
     Total   $195,404   $65,120  $74,118 
 
The number of children in care and being removed into care fluctuates annually, these 
estimates are using most recent data.  There are various training components required by the bill, 
some of this is currently being provided, but what is not currently provided can be incorporated 
into the current training for DCF staff and provider staff without any development expense or 
additional resources.  
 
Law enforcement would be primarily responsible for obtaining specific identifying 
information of the child; however, there are some requirements which would impact DCF and the 
Child Welfare Case Management Providers (CMP), particularly the inclusion of obtaining and 
forwarding medical and dental records to law enforcement and the need for additional training for 
staff.  An additional 4.00 FTE Specialist positions would be required to the do the work adequately 
and timely across the state. See the table below for position costs combined with the Kansas ID 
costs for the overall fiscal impact. 
 
 Item  	FY 2025  FY 2026  FY 2027 FY 2028 
 
Expenditures   
   Funding for CMP Positions  $259,975  $255,998  $258,056  $260,124 
   Kansas ID Costs    195,404    65,120    65,120    65,120 
      Total  $455,379  $321,198  $323,176  $325,244 
     
Financing   
   State General Fund   $302,823  $185,638  $186,627  $187,661 
   Federal Funds    152,556   135,560  136,549  137,583 
      Total   $455,379  $321,198  $323,176  $325,244 
 
DCF provided additional information in comparison to 2021 HB 1019 from Arizona. 
Arizona provides for a photo for those youth who do not qualify for a non-operating ID.  HB 2553 
does not have that provision.  
   The Honorable Susan Concannon, Chairperson 
Page 3—HB 2553 
 
 
The Kansas Bureau of Investigation indicates that HB 2553 would directly relate to the 
Kansas Missing Persons Clearinghouse (MPC), the bill provisions can be implemented as written 
with no additional changes.  The MPC is built to receive the information as entered by law 
enforcement when a NCIC missing person entry is made and is therefore largely reliant on the 
fields available in NCIC for missing person entries.  The Bureau’s assumption is this information 
is being entered by local law enforcement. 
 
The Office of Judicial Administration indicates that HB 2553 would have a negligible fiscal 
effect on expenditures of the Judicial Branch and would not have a fiscal effect on revenues.  
 
 The Kansas Highway Patrol and the Office of the Attorney General indicate that HB 2533 
would have no fiscal effect on expenditures for the agencies. Any fiscal effect associated with HB 
2553 is not reflected in The FY 2025 Governor’s Budget Report. 
 
 The Kansas Association of Counties indicates that HB 2553 would have no fiscal effect on 
counties to locate a missing child, as there are no new responsibilities allocated specifically to 
counties.  The costs of additional training required would be absorbed. 
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam C. Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
 
 
cc: Kim Holter, Department for Children & Families 
 Sherry Macke, Kansas Highway Patrol 
 Jay Hall, Kansas Association of Counties 
 William Hendrix, Office of the Attorney General 
 Paul Weisgerber, Kansas Bureau of Investigation 
 Trisha Morrow, Judiciary