Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2692 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam C. Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
February 15, 2024 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Susan Humphries, Chairperson 
House Committee on Judiciary 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 582-N 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Representative Humphries: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for HB 2692 by House Committee on Judiciary 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning HB 2692 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 HB 2692 would allow a defendant to raise a mental defect as a defense to a criminal 
prosecution under the Kansas Criminal Code if specific requirements have been met.  The bill 
would create exceptions to this affirmative defense if the defendant’s mental defect or mental 
disease was solely due to alcohol or chemical abuse, antisocial personality disorder, intellectual 
disability, organic personality syndrome, or an organic disorder.   
 
 The defense would be required to file a written notice that the defendant is claiming to have 
a mental defect that prevents him or her from understanding their action or an element of the crime. 
The defendant would also be required to give the prosecutor notice within 30 days after entering a 
not guilty plea.  The court could use its discretion to allow a late notice of the defendant’s intent 
to raise mental defects as a defense if good cause is shown for the late notice. A defendant who 
uses a mental defect would be required to abide by all court orders requiring a mental examination. 
This would include submitting to a mental health examination by the physician or licensed 
psychologist chosen by the court. 
 
 According to the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services (KDADS), 
enactment of HB 2692 would expand the definitions of conditions that can be used to justify a 
criminal defense related to lacking mental capacity to stand trial.  The bill would add the new 
criteria of laboring under a mental disease at the time of a criminal act that made the defendant not 
know the nature and quality of the act or that the act was wrong.  This could increase the number 
of criminal defendants using lack of mental state as a defense that would require admission to the 
State Security Program at Larned State Hospital (LSH) for this evaluation.  This could also increase  The Honorable Susan Humphries, Chairperson 
Page 2—HB 2692 
 
 
the number of individuals ordered for care and treatment at a state hospital pursuant to KSA 22-
3428 rather than serving a criminal sentence at a Department of Corrections facility.  
 
 Additional defendants ordered to LSH for evaluation of their mental state at the time of the 
alleged offense would use the same bed space as defendants ordered to LSH for competency 
restoration and other criminal evaluation and treatment statutes. KDADS believes more 
defendants would meet the new criteria for lacking culpability and would initially be committed 
to treatment for an indefinite period of time in a secure hospital facility. Most would need to 
remain in a secure forensic setting for a minimum of two to three years and some would remain 
hospitalized forever. 
 
 There is a wait list for admission to the State Security Program at LSH.  In January 2024 
there were a total of 170 defendants waiting for competency treatment or evaluation. Additional 
defendants that could be referred under HB 2692 would be added to the waitlist for the State 
Security Program.  The average wait time in January 2024 was over 440 days.  
 
 The State Security Program has one closed 30-bed unit that could be opened with adequate 
staffing.  If LSH used contract nursing agencies to staff the 30-bed unit to add more capacity, the 
annual cost would be $3.8 million from the State General Fund (see table below).  These costs are 
not currently in the LSH budget and could result in an increase in hospital staff turnover. 
 
Cost to Staff Additional State Security Program Unit 
 
 Classification Number Bi-Weekly Annual 
 
 RN (Contract) 3.00  $ 22,800  $  592,800 
 LPN (Contract) 3.00 18,000 468,000 
 MHDDT (Contract) 17.00 74,800  1,944,800 
 Psychologist (Contract) 1.00 9,200 239,200 
 Medical Staff (Contract) 1.00 14,800 384,800 
 Activity Therapist 2.00 4,375 113,750 
 Social Worker  1.00      2,843       73,918 
 	28.00  $146,818  $3,817,268 
 
 KDADS is currently in a lawsuit challenging the amount of time criminal defendants spend 
waiting for competency evaluation or restoration.  The bill would add people to the wait list by 
adding defendants that could be ordered to the State Security Program.  Adding more people to 
the waitlist could risk the State’s defense that LSH is trying to reduce wait time through mobile 
competency, community-based competency evaluation and restoration, and adding capacity 
through the South-Central Regional State Hospital. 
 
 The provider impact would be connected to referrals to Community Mental Health Centers 
(CMHCs) that provide services in local communities.  CMHCs also could perform the criminal 
competency evaluations ordered under the updated definitions under HB 2692.  Services performed 
by these providers are funded in the KDADS budget.  
  The Honorable Susan Humphries, Chairperson 
Page 3—HB 2692 
 
 
 According to the Office of Judicial Administration, enactment of HB 2692 could extend 
the time length of some trials because it expands criminal defense for a defendant. This, in turn, 
would increase the time spent by district court judicial and nonjudicial personnel in processing, 
researching, and hearing cases.  Nevertheless, until the courts have had an opportunity to operate 
under the provisions of HB 2692, an accurate estimate of the fiscal effect on expenditures by the 
Judicial Branch cannot be given.  The bill would not have a fiscal effect on revenues to the Judicial 
Branch or State General Fund.  Any fiscal effect associated with HB 2692 is not reflected in The 
FY 2025 Governor’s Budget Report.  
 
 The Kansas Association of Counties indicates that enactment of HB 2692 could affect 
county expenditures in making the determination and providing mental health services to 
individuals after the determination. 
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam C. Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
 
 
cc: Trisha Morrow, Judiciary 
 Jay Hall, Kansas Association of Counties 
 Leigh Keck, Department for Aging & Disability Services