Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas Senate Bill SB237 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
March 1, 2023 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Kellie Warren, Chairperson 
Senate Committee on Judiciary 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 346-S 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Senator Warren: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for SB 237 by Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning SB 237 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 SB 237 would make changes to the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act.  The 
bill would require a felony conviction before forfeiture of property would be allowed.  The bill 
would allow a person whose property was seized to petition the court to determine if the forfeiture 
is unconstitutionally excessive.  A plaintiff’s attorney would have the burden of proving beyond a 
reasonable doubt that the forfeiture is proportional to the seriousness of the offense.    
 
 The bill would require any sale proceeds to be deposited into the State General Fund.  The 
bill would delete the current distribution of forfeiture funds, which includes state agencies and 
local governments involved in the forfeiture process. The bill would clarify that the Kansas Bureau 
of Investigation (KBI) would allow public access to all reports in the asset seizure and forfeiture 
repository. Currently, state and local law enforcement agencies submit a report to the KBI for the 
repository once a year, which would be audited by the KBI.  The bill would change the reporting 
requirement to quarterly based on the calendar year.     
 
 The KBI states that the last five years the agency had 18 federal and nine state forfeitures 
totaling $335,515.  Currently, the KBI uses forfeiture revenues to lease a storage facility and 
maintain special use vehicles at a cost of approximately $60,000 per year.  These costs will be 
ongoing, and if the balance in the forfeiture funds is depleted the agency would request a State 
General Fund appropriation for this.   
 
 The KBI states that it currently has 1.00 Program Consultant that performs the reporting, 
compliance, training, contacting agencies, and completing Legislative requirements for the asset  The Honorable Kellie Warren, Chairperson 
Page 2—SB 237 
 
 
seizure and forfeiture repository. Because the bill requires more frequent reporting and 
compliance verification, the KBI would require 2.00 Administrative Officer FTE positions at a 
cost of $120,207 from the State General Fund in FY 2024.  Of that amount, $112,207 would be 
for salaries and wages and $8,000 would be for operating expenditures.   
 
 The Kansas Highway Patrol states that the average expenditures from the forfeiture monies 
have been $437,240 and are used to support the mission of the Special Operations Units.  Since 
FY 2015, the agency has received $6.4 million in revenues from state forfeiture and expended $3.4 
million.  Absent the ability to use funding from seizures, the agency would be forced to look for 
other sources of funding to supplement the reduction in revenues.  Furthermore, the requirement 
that forfeiture could only happen after a felony conviction could lengthen the time the agency 
holds property waiting for a trial, conviction, and acquittal to occur.  
 
 The Office of the Attorney General states that this bill would lead to an unknown amount 
of reduced revenue and increased costs to its agency.  The Judicial Branch indicates that bill could 
have a negligible fiscal effect on its operations that could be absorbed within existing resources.  
Any fiscal effect associated with SB 237 is not reflected in The FY 2024 Governor’s Budget 
Report.  
 
 The League of Kansas Municipalities indicates that the bill could increase expenditures if 
cities are required to assist with the implementation and enforcement of bill.  However, the League 
is unable to estimate an amount.  The Kansas Association of Counites states that the bill could 
have a fiscal effect on county expenditures and revenues since processes and procedures would 
change, but the fiscal effect cannot be estimated.   
 
 
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
cc: Vicki Jacobsen, Judiciary 
 Wendi Stark, League of Kansas Municipalities 
 Jay Hall, Kansas Association of Counties 
 Paul Weisgerber, Kansas Bureau of Investigation 
 Sherry Macke, Highway Patrol 
 Randy Bowman, Department of Corrections 
 John Milburn, Office of the Attorney General 
 Michael Neth, Office of the Adjutant General