Kansas Senate Bill SB319

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/21/23
• Refer: 3/22/23
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Establishing the alternatives to abortion program to provide resources and promote childbirth to women facing unplanned pregnancies.

Impact

The bill is intended to significantly impact state laws by formally addressing the needs of pregnant women and enhancing existing services related to unplanned pregnancy. It stipulates that the services offered must avoid any involvement with abortion-related activities, marking a clear delineation in funding and support mechanisms for various organizations. By concentrating on childbirth-supporting initiatives, the bill modifies how state resources are allocated toward reproductive health and family services, which may reduce the financial and emotional support available for those considering abortion.

Summary

Senate Bill 319 establishes the Alternatives to Abortion Program in Kansas, which aims to provide comprehensive support to women facing unplanned pregnancies. This program is designed to promote childbirth as an alternative to abortion by facilitating access to services that include counseling, educational resources, material assistance, and referrals to social service programs. The legislation mandates the collaboration between the state treasurer and a nonprofit organization to deliver these services effectively, ensuring they are accessible to the target demographic of pregnant women, fathers, and families of young children.

Contention

The discourse surrounding SB 319 highlights divisions among legislators and stakeholders in the community. Proponents argue that increased support for childbirth will empower women and foster healthier family structures, while critics raise concerns that the limitations placed on funding and services may restrict access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare. The bill has been characterized by debates over its implications for women's autonomy, the sufficiency of support provided, and the ethical considerations of promoting childbirth over abortion. Additionally, the rigorous criteria for nonprofit organizations seeking funding could lead to challenges in program execution and oversight.