Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas Senate Bill SB388 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam C. Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
February 1, 2024 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Jeff Longbine, Chairperson 
Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 546-S 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Senator Longbine: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for SB 388 by Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and 
Insurance 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning SB 388 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 SB 388 would change the working after retirement law for KPERS retirees. When a 
member retires from KPERS, there are statutes governing the return to work for a KPERS 
employer.  The law requires having: (1) a 180-day waiting period before being rehired by a KPERS 
employer, or a 60-day waiting period for members who retire at age 62 or later; (2) no 
prearrangements about returning to work; and (3) a special KPERS employer contribution for the 
employee for certain employee compensation. 
 
 For the special employer contribution, the employer makes contributions at the statutory 
rate (current 13.11 percent in FY 2024), up to $25,000 in earnings.  Any employee earnings above 
$25,000 are subject to a 30.0 percent employer contribution rate. SB 388 would increase the 
threshold for the 30.0 percent employer contribution to $40,000. 
 
 KPERS indicates that the provisions from the enactment of SB 388 could be implemented 
within its existing staffing levels and any costs would be negligible. 
 
 For the actuarial cost and based upon data provided during calendar year 2022, there were 
approximately 2,600 KPERS retirees working whose employer were subject to the special 
employer contribution rate. Based upon this data, the total employer contributions for these 
KPERS retirees was $13.1 million, including $6.3 million for compensation up to $25,000 and 
$6.9 million for compensation above $25,000. If the provisions of the bill would have been 
implemented, the employer contributions would have been reduced to $11.1 million, including 
$7.8 million for compensation up to $40,000 and $3.3 million for compensation above $40,000.  
This would result in a net fiscal effect of approximately $2.0 million in revenue for the KPERS  The Honorable Jeff Longbine, Chairperson 
Page 2—SB 388 
 
 
system.  This reduction of revenue would reduce the market and actuarial values of assets and 
would have increased the unfunded actuarial liability of the system; however, because of the total 
actuarial liability of $36.0 billion, with actuarial assets of $26.1 billion, the employer contribution 
loss of $2.0 million would be considered negligible to the long-term funding of the KPERS system 
and would not affect overall employer contribution rates, other than for the proposed threshold 
change. 
 
 KPERS notes that if retirement behavior would change and members would retire earlier 
than without SB 388, the policy could cause an increase to the unfunded actuarial liability of the 
retirement system, as the system would be paying more benefits than is currently estimated by the 
actuary.  However, this cost cannot be estimated.  Any fiscal effect associated with SB 388 is not 
reflected in The FY 2025 Governor’s Budget Report.  
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam C. Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
 
 
cc: Jarod Waltner, KPERS