Kansas 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2099 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/10/2025

                    SESSION OF 2025
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON HOUSE BILL NO. 2099
As Amended by Senate Committee on Local 
Government, Transparency and Ethics
Brief*
HB 2099, as amended, would authorize the City of 
Topeka (Topeka) to conduct periodic inspections of private 
residential housing properties when the owner of the property 
is receiving direct public financial assistance for tenant rent, 
define “direct public financial assistance” for this purpose, and 
establish requirements to conduct such inspections.
Under current law, cities and counties are prohibited 
from conducting interior housing inspections of private 
residential property without occupant’s consent. The bill 
would create an exception for such inspections by Topeka, 
upon adoption of an ordinance, if the property owner receives 
direct public financial assistance for tenant rent.
The bill would define “direct public financial assistance” 
to mean a financial payment or consideration from the U.S. 
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
The bill would require that Topeka provide reasonable 
notice to tenants of the date and time of an inspection. It 
would also provide that a landlord may be required to perform 
random inspections at the request of Topeka in response to 
code violation complaints. If a tenant objects to an inspection, 
the bill would direct Topeka to obtain an administrative search 
warrant to facilitate the inspection.
The bill would also provide a sunset date of July 1, 
2030, for the exception for Topeka.
____________________
*Supplemental notes are prepared by the Legislative Research 
Department and do not express legislative intent. The supplemental 
note and fiscal note for this bill may be accessed on the Internet at 
https://klrd.gov/ Background
The bill was introduced in the House Committee on 
Local Government at the request of a representative of the 
City of Topeka.
House Committee on Local Government
In the House Committee hearing, Representative Alcala 
and representatives of the City of Topeka, Topeka City 
Council, and Topeka/Shawnee County Homeless Task Force 
provided proponent testimony. The proponents stated that 
individuals who live in rental properties that receive 
governmental rental subsidies may not consent to an 
inspection because of fear of losing their residence for 
allowing such an inspection, even though the current living 
conditions for the resident may not be adequate. 
The proponents provided an example of residents living 
in such government-subsidized rental housing that had 
sewage, black mold growth, and no heat during freezing 
temperatures. The proponents stated that HUD administers 
the subsidies in the example described and is required to 
perform annual inspections. In the example, such inspections 
did not occur. 
The proponents stated that this bill would allow the City 
of Topeka to perform inspections to avoid situations like the 
example.
The proponents also suggested an amendment to name 
the City of Topeka as the local governing authority to have the 
authority to conduct the inspections; as introduced, the bill 
would have provided the authority to conduct inspections to 
all cities and counties. The amendment would also clarify 
governmental rental subsidies would mean only direct tenant 
rental payments.
2- 2099 Written-only proponent testimony was provided by 
representatives of the City of Concordia, League of Kansas 
Municipalities, and Kansas Association of Counties.
Opponent testimony was provided by a representative 
of the Associated Landlords of Kansas and a private citizen. 
The opponents stated that this bill would take away the rights 
of a lawful tenant because the lawful tenant should be the 
only one who should be allowed to authorize an inspection. 
They stated it should be the responsibility of the tenant to 
accept or ask for an inspection if there are life, safety, or 
health issues.
Written-only opponent testimony was provided by a 
representative of the Kansas Association of Realtors.
No other testimony was provided.
The House Committee amended the bill to:
●Provide a definition of “direct public financial 
assistance” to mean a financial payment or 
consideration from HUD;
●Change “governmental rental subsidies” to “direct 
public financial assistance”;
●Narrow the scope of the bill to limit the authority to 
conduct inspections to only Topeka; and
●Provide a sunset date of July 1, 2030, on the 
exception.
Senate Committee on Local Government, Transparency 
and Ethics
In the Senate Committee hearing, representatives of the 
the City of Topeka and the Topeka and Shawnee County 
Homeless Task Force provided proponent testimony. The 
3- 2099 proponents generally stated the bill would allow the city to 
conduct regular, mandatory inspections that are not currently 
lawfully possible of properties accepting government funds 
and would put protections in place for vulnerable tenants to 
report code violations.
Written-only proponent testimony was submitted by 
Representative Alcala, a member of the Topeka City Council, 
and a representative of the League of Kansas Municipalities. 
Neutral testimony was submitted by a representative of 
the Associated Landlords of Kansas, stating the sunset 
makes the bill more agreeable and narrowing the bill to the 
City of Topeka will prevent cities from abusing the inspection 
program, protecting vulnerable tenants.
Opponent testimony was provided by a private citizen, 
who stated rental inspections through the federal government 
for tenants who receive housing choice (“Section 8”) 
vouchers are thorough and cities do not need to add more 
inspections.
The Senate Committee made a technical amendment to 
the bill.
Fiscal Information
According to the fiscal note prepared by the Division of 
the Budget on the bill, as introduced, the League of Kansas 
Municipalities states enactment of the bill would have 
negligible fiscal effects on cities. The Kansas Association of 
Counties cannot estimate a fiscal effect because the 
Association is unable to determine how many more 
inspections would be necessary and whether that would 
require additional employees. [Note: After amendment, the 
exception would apply only to the City of Topeka.]
Governmental rental subsidies; private residential inspections; municipal housing 
inspections; Topeka
4- 2099