Kansas 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2149 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/14/2025

                    SESSION OF 2025
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE 
BILL NO. 2149
As Amended by House Committee of the Whole
Brief*
Sub. for HB 2149, as amended, would establish 
consumer protections for distributed energy customers and 
amend law related to parallel generation service contracts 
and net metering, including removing renewable generator 
capacity limits, permitting the use of locational marginal 
pricing, establishing a formula for determining the appropriate 
size for electrical loads, and establishing the customer’s right 
to repair, among other things.
Definitions (New Section 1)
The bill would define the following terms for the new 
sections of law:
●“Distributed energy customer” (customer) would 
mean a property owner of a single-family dwelling 
or multi-family dwelling of two units or fewer and 
who is offered a contract from a distributed energy 
retailer for the construction, installation, or 
operation of a distributed energy system that is 
primarily intended to offset the energy consumption 
of a single-family or multi-family dwelling;
●“Distributed energy retailer” (retailer) would mean 
any person or entity that sells, markets, solicits, 
advertises, finances, installs, or otherwise makes 
____________________
*Supplemental notes are prepared by the Legislative Research 
Department and do not express legislative intent. The supplemental 
note and fiscal note for this bill may be accessed on the Internet at 
https://klrd.gov/ available for purchase a distributed energy system 
in the state of Kansas;
●“Distributed energy system” (system) would mean 
any device or assembly of devices and supporting 
facilities that is capable of feeding excess electrical 
power generated by a customer’s energy 
producing system into the utility’s system such that 
all energy output and all other services will be fully 
consumed by the distributed energy customer or 
the utility and that is or will be subject to an 
agreement under state law or a net metering tariff 
that was voluntarily established by a utility;
○[Note: An example of such system would be a 
residential solar panel system that is 
interconnected with the electric grid.]
●“Permission to operate” would be defined as it is in 
continuing law; and
●“Utility” would mean an electric public utility, as 
defined in law; any cooperative, as defined in law; 
an electric utility owned by one or more such 
cooperatives; a non-stock member-owned electric 
cooperative corporation incorporated in Kansas; or 
a municipally owned or operated electric utility.
Consumer Protections (New Section 1)
The bill would prohibit any person or entity required to 
register with the Secretary of State pursuant to the Business 
Entity Standard Treatment Act from engaging in the business 
of or act in the capacity of a retailer within Kansas unless the 
person or entity is registered with the Secretary of State, in 
good standing, and authorized to conduct business in 
Kansas.
2- 2149 Retailer Disclosures
The bill would require a retailer, prior to entering into a 
contract with a customer for a distributed energy system, to 
provide each customer with a separate disclosure document 
that:
●Is written in at least 10-point type;
●Is written in the language that the retailer used to 
speak to the customer during the sales process or 
the language requested by the customer;
●Includes a description of the make and model of 
the system’s major components and the expected 
useful life of the system;
●Includes a guarantee concerning the quantity of 
energy that the system will generate on a 
measurable interval and a remedy if the system 
does not comply with the guarantee within one year 
following the date the system received permission 
to operate;
●Does not contain blank spaces that may be 
subsequently filled in with terms or conditions that 
materially affect the timing, value, or obligation of 
the contract unless the terms and conditions are 
separately acknowledged in writing by the 
customer;
●Includes, in bold and highlighted type, the total 
aggregate cost to the customer that would be 
incurred over the entirety of the contract. The total 
aggregate cost would be required to be separately 
acknowledged in writing by the customer;
●Includes a description of the ownership and 
transferability of any tax credits, rebates, 
3- 2149 incentives, or renewable energy certificates in 
connection with the system;
●Includes the name and certification number of the 
individual certified by the North American Board of 
Certified Energy Practitioners who would oversee 
the permitting and installation of the system or the 
name and license number of the master electrician 
or electrical contractor who would oversee the 
permitting and installation of the system;
●Provides a description of the process and all 
associated fees for transferring any financing, 
warranty, or other agreements relating to the 
system to a new owner; 
●Includes the name, phone number, email, and 
mailing address of the person or entity that the 
customer may contact for questions regarding 
performance, maintenance, or repair of the system;
●Includes a description of the assumptions used for 
any savings estimates that were provided to the 
customer and a description of the applicable utility 
billing structure that pertains to the system. The 
descriptions and assumptions would be required to 
include the same provisions as outlined in the 
standard form published by the Attorney General;
●Includes a statement that the retailer would provide 
the customer proof that, within 30 days of 
completion of installation:
○All permits required for the installation of the 
system were obtained prior to installation, if 
applicable;
○The system was inspected and approved by a 
qualified individual pursuant to the 
requirements of any local municipal ordinance 
or county resolution; 
4- 2149 ○The necessary interconnection applications 
and documentation were submitted to and 
approved by the affected utility; and
○The system received permission to operate;
●Includes a statement that any recurring payments 
for a system are required to pause and not be due 
if the system does not receive permission to 
operate within 90 days of the date that the first 
recurring payment is due. The recurring payments 
could resume at the time that the system receives 
permission to operate. Any payments due during 
any pause would either be forgiven or added to the 
end of the financing term and would not incur any 
penalties for non-payment during the term;
●Includes a statement describing any rate 
escalation, balloon payment, or potential 
reconfiguration of payment structure;
●Includes a statement as to whether operations or 
maintenance services are included as part of the 
original contract price and whether the costs to 
remove, reinstall, and repair the system are 
included as part of the original contract price 
should the system need to be removed, reinstalled, 
or repaired due to natural causes or due to any 
exterior repair, replacement, construction, or 
reconstruction work on the premises;
●Includes a statement describing the expected start 
and completion dates for the installation of the 
system;
●Includes a statement indicating whether any 
warranty or maintenance obligations related to the 
system could be transferred by the retailer to a 
third party and, if so, a statement that provides:
○“The maintenance and repair obligations 
under your contract may be assigned or 
5- 2149 transferred without your consent to a third 
party who, if required pursuant to state law, 
shall be registered with the Secretary of State, 
in good standing and authorized to conduct 
business in the state and bound to all terms of 
the contract. If a transfer occurs, you will be 
notified in writing of any change to the name, 
mailing address, email, or phone number to 
use for questions and payments or to request 
system maintenance or repair”;
●Includes a statement indicating whether the retailer 
would place a lien, notice, or other filing on or 
against real property as a result of the contract;
●Includes a statement, in bold and highlighted type, 
indicating whether the retailer will impose any fees 
or other costs upon the customer. If any fees or 
other costs will be charged to the customer, the 
aggregate total of the fees and other costs would 
be required to be provided and separately 
acknowledged in writing by the customer;
●Includes a statement in capital letters and bold and 
highlighted type that states:
○“[name of retailer] is not affiliated with any 
utility company or governmental agency and 
shall not claim any such affiliation”; and
●Could include any additional information that the 
retailer considers appropriate, only if such 
additional information is not intended to conceal or 
obscure the disclosures required pursuant to this 
section.
The bill would require the disclosure statement to be 
signed and dated by the customer at least one calendar day 
after the date that the contract for the system was executed.
6- 2149 Violations
The bill would require that any person or entity that 
violates the disclosure provisions or any retailer that fails to 
provide and perform the disclosures in the form and manner 
required pursuant to this section or that makes a materially 
misleading statement as part of, or when presenting, the 
disclosures be liable for a civil penalty in an amount not to 
exceed $10,000 for each violation.
The violator would be liable to the aggrieved person or 
customer, or to the State, for repayment of the civil penalty. 
The civil penalty would be recoverable in an action brought by 
the aggrieved person or customer or the Attorney General, 
county attorney, or district attorney. Any civil penalty would be 
in addition to any other relief, which could be granted 
pursuant to any other remedy available in law or equity.
If a retailer fails to comply with this section, any contract 
entered into between the retailer and the customer that 
pertains to the system would be deemed null and void.
This section would not apply to a transaction of real 
property on which a system is already located.
This section would take effect on July 1, 2025.
Utility Disclosures (New Section 2)
To allow a retailer to provide informed and accurate 
information to the customer, the bill would require a utility, 
upon the request of any retailer, to disclose all applications, 
rules, service standards, forms, or other documents required 
for interconnection of a system pursuant to law or a net 
metering tariff that was voluntarily established by a utility, 
including the utility’s historic amount of compensation per 
kilowatt-hour for interconnected systems and the current 
compensation amount for those systems. The historic amount 
of compensation must be provided in a dollar amount and 
7- 2149 shown on a monthly or similar billing period basis for not less 
than the preceding five years.
This section would take effect on July 1, 2025.
Standard Disclosure Form (New Section 3)
The bill would require the Attorney General to appoint 
and convene an advisory group to collectively develop, 
approve, and periodically revise a standard form that could be 
used by retailers to perform and provide the required 
disclosures. The advisory group would consist of the 
following:
●The Attorney General or their designee;
●Representatives from interested groups, including 
representatives of distributed energy retailers and 
utilities;
●One or more members of the general public who 
own residential property in Kansas;
●One or more Assistant Attorneys General; and
●Any other members the Attorney General considers 
necessary or appropriate.
The bill would require the Attorney General to publish on 
their website, on or before July 1, 2025, the most current 
version of the standard form that is developed and approved 
by the advisory group.
8- 2149 Parallel Generation Service Contracts (Section 4)
Definitions (Subsection (a))
The bill would amend continuing law related to parallel 
generation service contracts and incorporate the following 
definitions:
●“Avoided cost” would mean the incremental cost to 
an electric energy utility that the utility would 
generate itself or purchase from another source 
and as “avoided cost” is interpreted by the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) from time 
to time;
●“Distributed energy system” would mean any 
device or assembly of devices and supporting 
facilities that are capable of feeding excess electric 
power generated by the customer’s energy 
producing system into the utility’s system such that 
all energy output and all other services will be fully 
consumed by the customer or the utility;
●“Export” would mean power that flows from a 
customer’s electrical system through such 
customer’s billing meter and onto the utility’s 
electricity lines. It would include the sum of power 
on all phase conductors;
●“Interconnected” would mean a listed system that is 
designed to export power and attached or 
connected on the customer’s side of the retail 
meter at the customer’s delivery point;
●“Listed” would mean that the device or equipment 
has been tested and certified to meet the Institute 
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers safety 
standards that specifically pertain to the intended 
function of the device or equipment;
9- 2149 ●“Locational marginal price” would mean the hourly 
average market price of alternating current energy 
per kilowatt-hour established by the applicable 
locational marginal price pricing code of the 
Southwest Power Pool (SPP);
●“Monthly system average cost of energy per 
kilowatt hour” would mean the sum of all volumetric 
costs incurred by an electric utility during a 
calendar month or similar billing period as billed to 
the utility by generation and transmission providers 
and any volumetric generation costs incurred by 
the utility to generate energy divided by the total 
amount of retail kilowatt-hours that the utility sold in 
such month or billing period;
●“Permission to operate” would mean the 
operational date of the customer’s system as 
determined by the utility;
●“Utility” would mean any electric public utility, as 
defined in law; cooperative, as defined in law; 
electric utility owned by one or more such 
cooperatives; non-stock member-owned electric 
cooperative corporation incorporated in Kansas; or 
municipally owned or operated electric utility; and
●“Witness test” would mean an authorized 
representative of the electric utility who measures 
or verifies a specific setting or operational 
condition.
Removing Capacity Limits (Subsection (b))
The bill would make technical and conforming 
amendments to the law, including clarifying that the customer 
must be in good standing with the utility. The bill would 
remove language from continuing law regarding 
compensation, renewable generator capacity limits, and 
certain definitions.
10- 2149 Applications (Subsection (c))
The bill would authorize a utility to require any customer 
seeking to construct and install a system to submit an 
application prior to any connection of the system with the 
utility’s system; notify the utility of the proposed system; and 
verify that the system is constructed, installed, and operated 
with all applicable standards and codes. Any customer who 
submits an application to construct, install, and operate a 
system would have the option to remain on a retail rate tariff 
that is identical to the same rate class for which the customer 
would otherwise qualify as a retail customer who is not 
otherwise receiving service under a parallel generation 
service tariff or net metering tariff. 
The bill would require a utility to provide notice to a 
customer that the utility received the customer’s application 
within 30 days following receipt of the application. The bill 
would require the utility to act upon the application within 90 
calendar days of receipt of the application. If one or more 
additional studies are required, the utility would not be subject 
to such a 90-day deadline but would provide the customer 
with an estimated time frame for action on the application as 
soon as practicable after any studies are completed. If the 
application is denied, the utility would be required to provide 
the customer with a list of the reasons for such denial and 
corrective actions needed for approval.
The bill would allow a utility to assess upon any 
customer requesting to install a system:
●A fair and reasonable non-refundable 
interconnection application fee;
●Any applicable costs incurred by the utility for any 
study conducted to verify and allow the requested 
export capacity to be interconnected at the 
customer’s point of delivery, including, but not 
limited to, costs incurred as a result of the SPP’s 
study processes; and
11- 2149 ●Costs associated with any related system upgrade 
costs, devices, and equipment required to be 
furnished by the utility for the provision of accepting 
the requested export capacity.
Compensation and Locational Marginal Pricing (Subsection 
(d))
The bill would require every contract for parallel 
generation service to include provisions relating to fair and 
equitable compensation for energy exported to a utility by the 
consumer. The compensation would not be less than 100 
percent of the utility’s monthly avoided cost. A utility would be 
required to credit the compensation to the customer’s account 
and disclose to any customer the formula that the utility uses 
to determine the compensation that the utility provides 
pursuant to a contract for parallel generation service.
 The bill would provide an exception that a utility could 
use the locational marginal price or monthly system average 
cost of energy per kilowatt-hour to determine compensation 
for energy exported to the utility by the customer. Any such 
utility that uses locational marginal price or monthly system 
average cost of energy per kilowatt-hour would compensate 
the customer for the energy exported to the utility at least 
annually. The compensation could be paid to the customer or 
credited to the customer’s account. When determining 
compensation, in no case would a utility issue an invoice for 
energy exported to the utility by the customer’s system. Upon 
the request of any customer who is subject to locational 
marginal price compensation, the utility would be required to 
disclose the locational marginal price and corresponding 
amount of energy exported to the utility by the customer’s 
system.
The locational marginal price exception would sunset on 
July 1, 2030.
12- 2149 Terms and Conditions for Parallel Generation Service 
(Subsection (f))
The bill would require a utility to furnish, own, and 
maintain at the utility’s expense all necessary meters and 
associated equipment for billing. A utility could install at the 
utility’s expense load research meters and equipment to 
monitor customer generation and load. The customer would 
be required to provide the utility, at no expense to the utility, a 
location for these meters and equipment.
The customer would be required to furnish, install, 
operate, and maintain in good order and repair, at the 
customer’s expense, a listed device that is suitable for the 
operation of the customer’s system in parallel with the utility’s 
system. The bill would allow the utility to install, own, and 
maintain a disconnecting device located near the electric 
meter(s) or allow the utility to require that a customer’s 
system contain a switch, circuit breaker, fuse, or other device 
or feature that could be accessed by the utility at any time 
and would provide an authorized utility worker the ability to 
manually disconnect the customer’s system from the utility’s 
electric distribution system.
Before granting permission to operate a system, the bill 
would allow the utility to require:
●A witness test of the customer’s system and 
interconnection facilities; 
●The customer to provide the certificate of 
inspection of the customer’s system completed 
pursuant to any municipal ordinance or code 
requirements or a certification from an electrician or 
electrical engineer licensed in Kansas that the 
system is installed according to applicable codes 
and standards, 
●The customer to provide documentation that the 
customer’s system was constructed and installed 
13- 2149 under the direction of a person who is certified by 
the North American Board of Certified Energy 
Practitioners or a master electrician or electrical 
contractor licensed under continuing law.
The utility could require periodic witness testing of the 
customer’s system and interconnection facilities throughout 
the provision of parallel generation service. 
The bill would authorize the utility to have the right and 
authority to disconnect and isolate the distributed energy 
system without notice and at utility’s sole discretion when:
●Electric service to a customer’s premises is 
discontinued for any reason;
●Adverse electrical effects, such as power quality 
problems, are occurring or are believed to be 
occurring on the utility’s system or the electrical 
equipment of other utility customers;
●Hazardous conditions are occurring or are believed 
to be occurring on the utility’s system as a result of 
the operation of the system or protective 
equipment;
●The utility identifies uninspected or unapproved 
equipment or modifications to the system after 
initial approval;
●There is recurring abnormal operational, 
substandard operation, or inadequate maintenance 
of the distributed energy system;
●The customer fails to remit payment to the utility for 
any amounts owed, including, but not limited to, 
amounts invoiced;
●The customer does not comply with the obligations 
of the interconnection agreement, except that, if 
such non-compliance is not an emergency 
14- 2149 situation, the utility shall give the customer 90 days 
to cure the non-compliance prior to disconnecting 
and isolating the distributed energy system; or
●Disconnection is necessary due to emergency or 
maintenance purposes. In the event that the utility 
disconnects the system for maintenance, the utility 
would make reasonable efforts to reconnect the 
system as soon as practicable.
The bill would allow the customer to retain the authority 
to temporarily disconnect the customer’s system from the 
utility’s system at any time. Any such disconnection would not 
be construed as a customer’s termination of the 
interconnection agreement absent an express action to 
terminate such agreement pursuant to the terms and 
conditions of the agreement.
Formula for Appropriately Sized Electrical Load (Subsection 
(g))
The bill would determine the export capacity of a 
customer’s distributed energy system to be appropriately 
sized for each customer’s electric load by:
●Dividing the customer’s historic consumption in 
kilowatt-hours for the previous 12-month period by 
8,760. 
●Then dividing the quotient by a capacity factor of:
○0.144 when the customer is in the service 
territory of an investor-owned utility; and 
○0.288 when the customer is in the service 
territory of a cooperative as defined in law, 
electric utility owned by one or more 
cooperatives, non-stock member-owned 
electric cooperative corporation incorporated 
in Kansas, or municipally owned or operated 
electric utility.
15- 2149 If the customer does not have historic consumption data 
that adequately reflects the customer’s consumption at the 
premises, the bill would set the customer’s historic 
consumption for the previous 12-month period to be 7.15 
kilowatt-hours per square foot of conditioned space and 
would round the amount determined by the historic 
consumption formulas to the nearest one kilowatt alternating 
current power increment.
Aggregate Export Capacity (Subsection (h))
The bill would require, except as provided in the 
following “Exclusions” subsection, each utility to make parallel 
generation service available to customers who are in good 
standing with the utility on a first-come, first-served basis, 
until the utility’s aggregate export capacity from all distributed 
energy systems, including systems that are subject to a 
parallel generation service tariff and systems that are subject 
to a net metering tariff that was either voluntarily established 
by the utility or by law, equals or exceeds the following:
●Commencing July 1, 2025, 6 percent of the utility’s 
historic peak demand;
●Commencing July 1, 2026, 7 percent of the utility’s 
historic peak demand; and
●Commencing July 1, 2027, and each year 
thereafter, 8 percent of the utility’s historic peak 
demand.
The bill would allow the utility to limit the export capacity 
of additional systems to be connected to the utility’s system 
due to the capacity of the distribution line to which the system 
would be connected. 
16- 2149 Exclusions (Subsection (i))
The bill would clarify that a utility would not be required 
to make parallel generation service available to any customer 
who has a new or expanded facility that receives electric 
service at a voltage of 34.5 kilovolts or higher and 
commences such electric service on or after July 1, 2025.
In determining a utility’s historic peak demand, a utility’s 
peak demand would not include the additional demand of any 
new or expanded facility of an industrial, commercial, or data 
center customer that receives electric service at a voltage of 
34.5 kilovolts or higher and commences such electric service 
on or after July 1, 2025.
This subsection would expire on July 1, 2026.
Export-limiting Devices (Subsection (j))
The bill would require the following provisions regarding 
export-limiting devices for any customer with a system:
●The customer would own and maintain any 
necessary export-limiting device;
●Protections would be in place to restrict the export-
limiting device settings to qualified persons;
●The utility would have the option to require a 
witness test of the export-liming device’s functions 
or settings prior to granting permission to operate 
and at any time during which the distributed energy 
system is connected to the utility’s system;
●The export capacity of the system would not be 
increased without prior approval of the utility;
●The customer would allow the utility to perform 
periodic witness tests of the export-limiting device’s 
functions or settings upon request;
17- 2149 ●If the export-limiting device’s functions or settings 
are incorrect or if the device fails to limit the export 
of power below the designated export capacity for 
more than 15 minutes in any single event, the 
customer shall cease operation of the system until 
repair or reprogramming of the export-limiting 
device is completed. The utility could require and 
conduct a witness test prior to authorizing 
operation of the system; and
●The utility would not restrict the brand or model of 
the export-limiting device if the device is approved 
by the manufacturer of a listed distributed energy 
system or is listed to perform such operations in 
conjunction with the customer’s system.
Regulation (Subsection (k))
Regarding parallel generation service, for a utility 
subject to the jurisdiction, regulation, supervision, and control 
(regulation) of the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC), 
the bill would require that service under any parallel 
generation service contract would be subject to either the 
utility’s rules and regulations on file with the KCC, which 
would include a standard interconnection process and 
requirements for the utility’s system, or the current Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) interconnection 
procedures and regulations. 
For a utility that is not subject to KCC regulation, the bill 
would require that service under any parallel generation 
service contract would be subject to the current FERC 
interconnection procedures and regulations.
The bill would clarify that, in any case where the 
customer and a utility that is subject to KCC regulation cannot 
agree to terms and conditions of any contract provided for by 
this section, the KCC would be required to establish the terms 
and conditions for the contract.
18- 2149 Fees (Subsection (l))
The bill would prohibit a utility from imposing any 
additional fees, charges, or requirements for the provision of 
parallel generation service unless expressly authorized in this 
section.
The bill would also clarify that nothing in this section 
could be construed to:
●Prohibit a utility from charging a customer for the 
use of the utility’s system; and
●Authorize a utility to charge a customer for power 
exported to the utility by a customer.
Canceling Service Contracts (Subsection (m))
The bill would require any customer who has received 
utility approval to construct or operate a system to notify the 
utility within 30 calendar days following the date when the 
construction has been canceled or the system is permanently 
shut down. The utility would be required to cancel the parallel 
generation service contract with the customer upon receipt of 
such notice.
If a utility has reason to suspect that a customer’s 
system has been abandoned and is no longer producing 
energy, the utility could request verification from the customer 
that the system is still functioning, or that the customer has a 
reasonable plan to reenergize the system. 
If a customer fails to repair the system or provide a 
reasonable plan to complete the repairs within six months, 
the utility would have the option to cancel the parallel 
generation service contract with the customer.
19- 2149 Upon cancellation of any parallel generation service 
contract, the utility would not be obligated to refund any fees 
previously paid by the customer.
Right to Repair (Subsection (n))
The bill would establish a customer’s right to repair or 
rebuild their system with listed equipment as long as the 
repair or rebuild does not cause an increase in export 
capacity. 
If a customer repairs or replaces a system, the customer 
would be required to notify the utility prior to the repair or 
replacement and provide proof that the new equipment 
complies with the same rules, regulations, and approved 
capacity as the original installation. The utility would have the 
right to require and conduct a witness test prior to authorizing 
operation of the system. A customer who repairs or replaces 
a system would not be required to submit a new parallel 
generation service application to the utility.
The bill would prohibit a customer from repairing or 
replacing a distributed energy system in a way that increases 
the export capacity of the system without providing prior 
notification to the utility. The utility would be permitted to 
require the customer to submit a new parallel generation 
service application to include the provisions and requirements 
relating to the system.
Demand Response (Subsection (p))
The bill would clarify that nothing in this section could be 
construed to require any cooperative, non-stock member-
owned electric cooperative corporation incorporated in 
Kansas or a municipally owned or operated electric utility to 
opt-in to or otherwise participate in any demand response or 
distributed energy resource aggregation programs.
20- 2149 Net Metering and Easy Connection Act (Section 5)
The bill would amend the Net Metering and Easy 
Connection Act to include several provisions similar to the 
amendments made to the Parallel Generation Service 
Contracts law in the bill.
Canceling Interconnection Agreements (Subsection (c))
The bill would require any customer-generator who has 
received approval from a utility to construct or operate a net 
metering facility to notify the utility within 30 days of when the 
construction has been canceled or the facility is permanently 
shut down. The utility would be required to cancel the 
interconnection agreement with the customer upon receipt of 
the notice.
If a utility has reason to suspect that a customer-
generator’s facility has been abandoned and is no longer 
producing energy, the utility could request verification from 
the customer-generator that the facility is still functioning or 
that the customer-generator has a reasonable plan to 
reenergize the facility. If the customer-generator fails to repair 
the facility or provide a reasonable plan to complete the 
repairs within six months, the utility would have the option to 
cancel the interconnection agreement with the customer-
generator.
Upon cancellation of any interconnection agreement, the 
utility would not be obligated to refund any fees previously 
paid by the customer-generator.
Right to Repair (Subsection (d))
The bill would establish a customer-generator’s right to 
repair or rebuild their net metering facility that is subject to an 
interconnection agreement with listed equipment as long as 
the repair or rebuild does not cause an increase in export 
capacity.
21- 2149 If a customer-generator repairs or replaces a facility, the 
customer would be required to notify the utility prior to the 
repair or replacement and provide proof that the new 
equipment complies with the same rules, regulations, and 
approved capacity as the original installation. The utility would 
have the right to require and conduct a witness test prior to 
authorizing operation of the facility. A customer who repairs 
and replaces a facility would not be required to submit a new 
net metering interconnection application to the utility.
The bill would prohibit a customer-generator from 
repairing or replacing a facility system in a way that increases 
the export capacity of the system without providing prior 
notification to the utility. The utility would be permitted to 
require the customer-generator to submit a new net metering 
interconnection application to include the new provisions and 
requirements relating to the facility.
The bill would be in effect upon publication in the 
Kansas Register.
Background
The bill was introduced by the House Committee on 
Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications at the request of a 
representative of the Clean Energy Business Council.
House Committee on Energy, Utilities and 
Telecommunications
In the House Committee hearing, proponent testimony 
was provided by representatives of the Clean Energy 
Business Council and King Solar. The proponents generally 
stated that the bill seeks to create consistency in distributed 
generation policy, create disclosure requirements for solar 
retailers, address technical concerns about the interaction 
with the electric grid, and provide guardrails for how an 
existing system can be repaired. The proponents emphasized 
22- 2149 that the bill as introduced is not their final product and that 
they are working with other stakeholders to perfect the 
language.
Written-only proponent testimony was provided by 
representatives of Artisun Solar, Hutton Energy Service, 
Kansans for Lower Electric Rates, and Kansas Industrial 
Consumers Group.
Opponent testimony was provided by representatives of 
Evergy, Heartland Rural Electric Cooperatives, Kansas 
Electric Cooperatives, Kansas Municipal Energy Agency, 
Kansas Municipal Utilities, and Midwest Energy. The 
opponents generally expressed concern with the language in 
the bill as introduced, including the compensation formula 
and the absence of device isolation provisions, and discussed 
their negotiations to propose various amendments.
Written-only opponent testimony was provided by a 
representative of Pioneer Electric Cooperatives, Prairieland 
Electric Cooperatives, Southern Pioneer Electric Company, 
Sunflower Electric Power Corporation, The Victory Electric 
Cooperative Association, Western Cooperative Electric 
Association, and Wheatland Electric Cooperative.
Written-only neutral testimony was provided by a 
representative of the Kansas Chamber, who requested an 
amendment to the definition of “distributed energy systems.”
No other testimony was provided.
The House Committee amended the bill to:
Definitions
●Alter the definition of “distributed energy customer” 
to specify that it would mean a property owner of a 
single-family dwelling or multi-family dwelling of two 
units or fewer;
23- 2149 ●Alter the definition of “distributed energy retailer” to 
include any person or entity that finances or installs 
a distributed energy system;
●Alter the definition of “distributed energy system” to 
specify that it would mean any device(s) capable of 
feeding excess electrical power generated by a 
customer’s energy producing system into the 
utility’s system such that all energy output and all 
other services will be fully consumed by the 
distributed energy customer or the utility;
●Remove the definition of “financed distributed 
energy system”;
●Alter the definition of “utility” to include electric 
utilities owned by one or more cooperatives; 
●Remove the term “financed” before references to 
“distributed energy system” throughout;
●Remove references to “renewable” energy 
throughout;
Consumer Protections
●Require that distributed energy retailers be 
registered with the Secretary of State, in good 
standing, and authorized to conduct business in 
Kansas;
Retailer Disclosures
●Include a description of the expected useful life of 
the distributed energy system; 
●Require certain terms and conditions to be 
acknowledged in writing by the customer;
24- 2149 ●Clarify that the individual certified by the North 
American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners 
would oversee the permitting and installation of the 
system;
●Require a description of all associated fees for 
transferring any financing, warranty, or other 
agreements to a new owner;
●Require the description and assumptions used for 
savings estimates to include the same provisions 
as outlined in the Attorney General’s standard form;
●Clarify that proof of all permits for installation is 
required only if applicable;
●Include a statement as to whether the costs to 
remove, reinstall, and repair the system are 
included as part of the original contract price, 
should the system be affected by natural causes or 
exterior work on the premises;
●Alter the required language about the potential 
transfer of maintenance obligations to require the 
third party to be registered with the Secretary of 
State, in good standing, and authorized to conduct 
business in Kansas;
●Clarify that a statement would indicate whether the 
retailer shall place a lien, notice, or other filing on 
or against real property;
●Establish a maximum civil penalty of $10,000 for 
each violation of disclosure requirements;
●Clarify that the section regarding consumer 
protections would not apply to a transaction of real 
property on which a system is already located;
●Clarify that the consumer protection provisions 
would take effect on July 1, 2025;
25- 2149 Utility Disclosures
●Require a utility to disclose, upon request, all other 
documents required for interconnection of a 
distributed energy system or a net metering tariff 
that was voluntarily established by a utility; 
●Remove a provision regarding the disclosure of the 
historic amount of compensation on the utility’s 
website;
●Clarify that the utility disclosure provisions would 
take effect on July 1, 2025;
Standard Disclosure Form
●Insert a provision requiring the Attorney General to 
appoint an advisory group charged with developing 
a standard disclosure form, which the bill would 
require to be published on the Attorney General’s 
website on or before July 1, 2025;
Parallel Generation Service Contracts
Definitions
●Insert definitions for “avoided cost” and “distributed 
energy system”;
●Remove the definition for “limited export”;
●Replace “underwriters laboratories,” in the 
definition of “listed”, with “the institute of electrical 
and electronics engineers”;
●Remove a line in the definition of “locational 
marginal price” pertaining to $0.01 per kilowatt-
hour of alternating current;
26- 2149 ●Replace references to “renewable” energy systems 
with references to “distributed” energy systems;
●Replace the definition of “utility”; 
●Clarify that a witness test must be performed by an 
authorized representative of the electric utility;
Applications
●Insert provisions outlining application requirements 
for customers seeking to construct and install a 
distributed energy system with the utility’s system;
●Remove the bill’s interconnection application fee 
schedule and replace it with a provision stating 
that, for any customer requesting to install a 
distributed energy system, a utility may assess:
○A fair and reasonable non-refundable 
interconnection application fee;
○Any applicable costs incurred by the utility for 
any study conducted on export capacity; and
○Costs associated with any related system 
upgrade costs, devices, and equipment 
required to be furnished by the utility in order 
to accept the requested export capacity;
Compensation and Locational Marginal Pricing
●Change the calculation of compensation for 
exported energy to be not less than 100 percent of 
the utility’s monthly avoided cost;
●Replace the provision related to locational marginal 
pricing, removing references to Midwest Energy, 
and move the sunset from 2035 to 2030;
27- 2149 Terms and Conditions for Parallel Generation Service
●Clarify that the utility would furnish, own, and 
maintain all necessary meters and equipment at 
the utility’s expense;
●Restore a provision allowing the utility to limit the 
energy production from the generating facility to an 
amount no greater than the load at the customer’s 
facility;
●Clarify that the customer would be required to 
furnish, install, operate, and maintain a listed 
device at the customer’s expense;
●Add that the utility would be permitted to require 
that a customer’s system contain a switch, circuit 
breaker, fuse, or other device or feature that may 
be accessed by the utility to manually disconnect 
the system;
●Remove a provision permitting the utility to require 
a customer to reimburse the utility for any devices 
or equipment required to be furnished;
●Add a provision requiring documentation that the 
customer’s system was constructed and installed 
under the direction of a person who is certified by 
the North American Board of Certified Energy 
Practitioners, a master electrician, or licensed 
electrical contractor;
●Insert a provision granting the utility the right and 
authority to disconnect and isolate the distributed 
energy system without notice and at a utility’s sole 
discretion under certain circumstances;
●Insert a provision stating the customer would retain 
the authority to temporarily disconnect the 
customer’s system at any time. The disconnection 
28- 2149 would not be construed as a termination of 
agreement without express action; 
●Remove a paragraph regarding special 
agreements for technical and safety conditions;
Formula for Appropriately Sized Electrical Load
●Change the formula for determining the appropriate 
size for distributed energy systems to differentiate 
capacity factors by types of utilities;
●Replace certain provisions regarding rounding to 
the nearest standard size with rounding to the 
nearest one kilowatt alternating current power 
increment;
Aggregate Export Capacity
●Require each utility to make parallel generation 
service available to customers who are in good 
standing with the utility on a first-come, first-served 
basis, until the utility’s aggregate export capacity 
from all distributed energy systems equals or 
exceeds the following:
○Commencing July 1, 2025, 6 percent of the 
utility’s historic peak demand;
○Commencing July 1, 2026, 7 percent of the 
utility’s historic peak demand; and
○Commencing July 1, 2027, and each year 
thereafter, 8 percent of the utility’s historic 
peak demand;
Exclusions
●Provide an exception to the aggregate export 
capacity requirement by not requiring a utility to 
make parallel generation service available to any 
29- 2149 customer who has a new or expanded facility that 
receives electric service at a voltage of 34.5 
kilovolts or higher and commences such electric 
service on or after July 1, 2025;
●Determine a utility’s historic peak demand for 
purposes of the aggregate export capacity; a 
utility’s peak demand shall not include the 
additional demand of any new or expanded facility 
of an industrial, commercial, or data center 
customer that receives electric service at a voltage 
of 34.5 kilovolts or higher and commences such 
electric service on or after July 1, 2025;
●Set a sunset date of July 1, 2026, for the 
exclusions provisions; 
Export-limiting Devices
●Authorize a utility to require a witness test of the 
export-limiting device’s functions or settings prior to 
granting permission to operate and at any time 
during which the distributed energy system is 
connected to the utility’s system;
●Allow a utility to require and conduct a witness test 
prior to authorizing operation of the system after a 
repair or reprogramming of the export-limiting 
device is completed;
Regulation
●Specify that parallel generation service contracts 
shall be subject to utilities under the jurisdiction, 
regulation, and supervision, and control of the KCC 
shall be subject to the utility’s interconnection 
procedures and rules and regulations on file with 
the KCC;
30- 2149 ●Specify for those utilities not subject to KCC 
regulation, that service for any parallel generation 
service contracts shall be subject to current FERC 
interconnection procedures and regulations;
●Clarify a provision regarding when a customer and 
utility cannot agree on contract terms and 
conditions to specify a “utility” is one that is 
regulated by the KCC.
Fees
●Clarify that nothing the section would be construed 
to:
○Prohibit a utility from charging a distributed 
energy customer for the use of the utility’s 
system; and
○Authorize a utility to charge a distributed 
energy customer for power exported to the 
utility by a customer.
Canceling Service Contracts
●Reduce the time period from 24 months to 6 
months for a customer to repair a system or 
provide a reasonable plan to complete repairs to a 
system before a utility has the option to cancel the 
parallel generation service contract with such 
customer;
Right to Repair
●Specify that when a customer receives approval 
from a utility to construct or operate a distributed 
energy system, that customer shall notify the utility 
within 30 calendar days following the date when 
construction has been canceled or permanently 
shut down;
31- 2149 ●Provide the right to repair listed equipment to the 
customer so long as the listed equipment does not 
increase the system’s export capacity:
●After a customer does conduct the right to repair 
their system, the utility will have the right to require 
and conduct a witness test prior to authorizing 
operation of the system; and
●Before a customer exercises the right to repair their 
system, they shall be required to notify the utility if 
the repairs would increase the export capacity of 
the system;
Demand Response
●Specify that nothing in the section shall be 
construed to require any cooperative as defined in 
continuing law, non-stock member-owned electric 
cooperative corporation incorporated in Kansas or 
municipally owned or operated electric utility to opt-
in to or otherwise participate in any demand 
response or distributed energy resource 
aggregation programs;
Net Metering and Easy Connection Act
●Update the net metering statute to require any 
customer-generator who has received approval 
from a utility to construct or operate a net metering 
facility to notify the utility within 30 days when the 
construction has been canceled or permanently 
shut down;
●Provide the right to repair listed equipment for a 
customer-generator of a net metering system so 
long as the listed equipment does not increase the 
system’s export capacity:
32- 2149 ○After a customer does exercise the right to 
repair their system, the utility will have the 
right to require and conduct a witness test 
prior to authorizing operation of the system; 
and
○Before a customer exercises the right to 
repair their system, the bill would require the 
customer to notify the utility if the repairs 
would increase the export capacity of the 
system;
●Make technical and conforming changes; and
●Change the effective date to upon publication in the 
Kansas Register.
The House Committee recommended a substitute bill be 
passed incorporating the amendments.
House Committee of the Whole
The House Committee of the Whole amended the bill to 
specify that only those entities required by the Business 
Entity Standard Treatment Act to be registered with the 
Secretary of State would be required to be registered with the 
Secretary of State under the bill.
Fiscal Information
According to the fiscal note prepared by the Division of 
the Budget on the bill, as introduced, the Citizen’s Utility 
Ratepayer Board (CURB) indicates that enactment of the bill 
would not have an immediate fiscal effect on operations but 
would potentially create dockets on new tariffs in the future 
that would require intervention by the Board. CURB 
anticipates that it would be able to handle the additional 
workload within existing resources. The KCC indicates that 
enactment of the bill would not have a fiscal effect on 
33- 2149 operations. Any fiscal effect associated with enactment of the 
bill is not reflected in The FY 2026 Governor’s Budget Report.
The League of Kansas Municipalities indicates that 
enactment of the bill could increase operating expenditures or 
decrease revenues to cities; however, a fiscal effect cannot 
be estimated. The Kansas Association of Counties indicates 
that enactment of the bill would have a fiscal effect for any 
county that qualifies as an energy retailer; however, a fiscal 
effect cannot be estimated.
Energy; utilities; distributed energy systems; distributed generation; consumer 
protections; parallel generation; solar power
34- 2149