Kansas House Bill HB2205

Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/25
• Refer: 2/3/25

Caption

Prohibiting lobbying for or by foreign adversaries; authorizing the attorney general to file civil lawsuits; providing for civil penalties for violations thereof.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2205 could significantly reshape state laws concerning lobbying and ethics by introducing explicit restrictions against foreign influence in governmental affairs. The bill grants the Attorney General the authority to pursue civil actions against individuals or entities that violate its provisions, establishing a system of accountability for lobbying practices linked to foreign adversaries. Violation of this law invokes substantial civil penalties, escalating with repeated offenses—up to $150,000 for multiple violations—ensuring that the consequences are strong deterrents against such lobbying activities.

Summary

House Bill 2205 is a legislative proposal aimed at prohibiting lobbying activities conducted on behalf of foreign adversaries. It specifically bans individuals from engaging in lobbying efforts for foreign governments classified as adversaries by the state, such as China, Russia, Iran, and others. The bill defines 'foreign adversaries' broadly, encompassing not only governments but also their officials, corporations, and any entities operated under their control. This comprehensive definition is designed to mitigate the influence of foreign interests on local governance and policy-making.

Contention

The introduction of HB 2205 may stir considerable debate over governmental ethics and foreign influence. Proponents argue that it is a necessary measure to protect the integrity of state governance, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding policy-making from external influences that could undermine national interests. Conversely, critics may raise concerns regarding the vagueness of the terms used in the bill, potentially leading to overreach and hindering legitimate lobbying efforts that do not pose a threat to state interests. The balance between national security and the rights of individuals and organizations to engage in lobbying will likely be a focal point of contention.