Kansas 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2213 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/18/2025

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam C. Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
February 5, 2025 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Mike Thompson, Chairperson 
House Committee on Veterans and Military 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 281-N 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Representative Thompson: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for HB 2213 by House Committee on Veterans and Military 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning HB 2213 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 HB 2213 would prohibit the receipt of compensation for preparing, presenting, 
prosecuting, advising, consulting, or assisting any individual with regard to any veterans benefits 
matter and would list requirements if an individual was to provide any of those services.  The bill 
would define “veterans benefits matter” and specify that violation of the bill’s provisions would 
be a violation of the Consumer Protection Act.  The bill would be effective upon publication in the 
Kansas Register. 
 
 According to the Kansas Office of Veterans Services, enactment of HB 2213 would not 
have a fiscal effect on the agency.  The Office of Judicial Administration states enactment of HB 
2213 could increase the number of cases filed in district courts because it creates a violation of the 
Kansas Consumer Protection Act.  This could result in more time spent by judicial and nonjudicial 
personnel processing, researching, and hearing these cases.  The Office estimates enactment of the 
bill could result in the collection of docket fees and fines assessed in those cases filed under the 
bill’s provisions, which would be deposited to the State General Fund.  The bill would not affect 
other revenues to the Judicial Branch.  However, a fiscal effect cannot be estimated.   
 
 The Office of the Attorney General reports that enactment of HB 2213 could increase 
litigation costs for the agency but is unable to estimate these litigation costs.  The Office estimates 
that in addition to potential litigation costs, $156,080 would be needed beginning in FY 2026, all 
from the State General Fund.  This estimate includes 1.00 FTE Investigator position with salaries 
and wages totaling $60,849, as well as 0.50 FTE Assistant Attorney General position totaling  The Honorable Mike Thompson, Chairperson 
Page 2—HB 2213 
 
 
$66,952.  In addition, technology, training, and other administrative costs for these positions would 
total approximately $28,279.  Future costs after FY 2026 would increase by the rate of inflation. 
The Office notes that violations of the provisions of the bill would have to be investigated by the 
Consumer Protection Division and would produce new cases that the Office would be required to 
process, investigate, and review, requiring an increase of internal staff.  Any fiscal effect associated 
with HB 2213 is not reflected in The FY 2026 Governor’s Budget Report.  
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam C. Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
 
 
cc: Melissa Ford, Office of Veterans Services  
 Matt Bingesser, Office of the Attorney General 
 Trisha Morrow, Judiciary