Kansas House Bill HB2285

Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/5/25
• Refer: 2/5/25

Caption

Modifying the definition of lead-based paint in the residential childhood lead poisoning prevention act to include paint that contains lead equal to or in excess of 0.009% by weight or in excess of that specified in federal law, whichever is less.

Impact

The enactment of HB2285 would make a significant impact on state laws regarding lead exposure, especially in residential settings. By establishing clearer definitions and regulations for lead-based paint activities, the bill aims to create a more robust framework for lead inspection, assessment, and abatement processes. This could lead to an increase in the number of homes subject to inspections and remediations, ultimately minimizing lead exposure risk for children. Additionally, the revisions may lead to increased training and licensing requirements for professionals engaged in lead remediation services.

Summary

House Bill 2285 aims to enhance the definition of lead-based paint within the framework of the Residential Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Act. This bill modifies the existing definition to categorize paint that contains lead in concentrations equal to or exceeding 0.009% by weight as lead-based paint, aligning it with federal standards while ensuring it meets the stricter thresholds when applicable. The bill's provisions are designed to better protect children by identifying hazardous materials that could potentially be present in residential settings, especially homes built prior to 1978 when lead paint was more commonly used.

Contention

While the bill is largely aimed at enhancing public health protections, there may be concerns about the compliance burden it could place on homeowners and landlords. Some stakeholders may worry that the increased definition of lead-based paint will result in additional financial responsibilities for property owners, who may need to undertake lead remediation efforts before selling or renting their properties. Moreover, discussions might arise around the adequacy of resources available for proper lead testing and abatement, particularly in lower-income communities where housing may be older and lead risks are higher.