Kansas 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2299 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 02/18/2025

                    SESSION OF 2025
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON HOUSE BILL NO. 2299
As Amended by House Committee on Education
Brief*
HB 2299, as amended, would create law prohibiting 
religious discrimination and antisemitism in public educational 
institutions and amend the Kansas Act Against Discrimination 
(Act) to prohibit antisemitism. The bill also would authorize 
the Kansas Attorney General to investigate violations and 
enforce the provisions of the bill and the Act.
Public Educational Institutions (New Section 1)
Prohibition on Religious Discrimination and Antisemitism
The bill would declare as state policy that public 
educational institutions that receive and expend tax dollars 
are prohibited from engaging in practices or implementing 
policies that discriminate or cause prejudice on the basis of 
religion or promote or tolerate antisemitism or antisemitic 
acts.
The bill would state that the prohibition is not to be 
construed to prohibit any coursework that is dedicated to the 
education and study of world religions or cultures in public 
educational institutions.
____________________
*Supplemental notes are prepared by the Legislative Research 
Department and do not express legislative intent. The supplemental 
note and fiscal note for this bill may be accessed on the Internet at 
https://klrd.gov/ Complaints
The bill would allow a person, or the parent or guardian 
of a person under 18 years of age, aggrieved by a violation of 
the prohibition on religious discrimination and antisemitism to 
file a complaint with the Attorney General.
Investigations
The bill would authorize the Attorney General to 
investigate any complaint received, and during the course of 
the investigation, the Attorney General would be permitted to:
●Subpoena witnesses, evidence, records, 
documents, and other material related to the 
complaint;
●Take testimony under oath;
●Examine or cause to be examined any records or 
other material that is relevant to the complaint;
●Require a person to attend any proceeding and 
provide testimony under oath regarding any 
material that is relevant to the complaint;
●Serve interrogatories; and
●Administer oaths and affirmations.
Requirements for subpoenas and interrogatories. 
The bill would require service for any subpoena or 
interrogatory issued by the Attorney General to be made by 
certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last known 
place of business or residence or in a manner provided by the 
Code of Civil Procedure.
2- 2299 Intentional refusal to respond. If a person intentionally 
refuses to respond to a subpoena, interrogatory, or other 
request made by the Attorney General, the bill would permit 
the Attorney General, after notice, to file a petition with the 
appropriate district court for a hearing. The bill would provide 
that if a court finds the person is required to respond, the 
court may:
●Issue an order requiring the person to respond to 
the subpoena, interrogatory, or request; or
●Hold the person in contempt until the person 
responds to the subpoena, interrogatory, or 
request.
Civil Penalty
If, after investigating a complaint, the Attorney General 
finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a public 
educational institution violated the prohibition on religious 
discrimination and antisemitism, the bill would require the 
Attorney General to assess a civil penalty against the public 
educational institution in an amount not to exceed $10,000 
per violation. The bill would direct any civil penalty recovered 
under this provision to be deposited into the State General 
Fund.
The bill would allow a public educational institution to 
appeal an assessed civil penalty in accordance with the 
Kansas Judicial Review Act.
Definitions
The bill would define the following terms:
●“Antisemitism” or “antisemitic” would mean the 
same as defined by the International Holocaust 
Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition 
of antisemitism, including the contemporary 
3- 2299 examples, as in effect on May 26, 2016, and would 
include:
○Encouraging, supporting, praising, 
participating in, or threatening violence or 
vandalism against Jewish people or property;
○Wearing masks to conceal a person’s identity 
with the intent to harass or discriminate 
against Jewish students, faculty, or 
employees on school property; and
○Incorporating or allowing funding of 
antisemitic curriculum or activities in any 
domestic or study abroad programs or 
classes; and
●“Public educational institution” would mean any 
elementary or secondary school operated by a 
unified public school district under state law, a 
community college established under state law, 
Washburn University, Washburn Institute of 
Technology, a technical college established under 
state law, or an institution supervised by the Board 
of Regents.
Kansas Act Against Discrimination (Sections 2–4)
The bill would amend the Act to declare it would be state 
policy that:
●Public institutions that receive and expend tax 
dollars are prohibited from engaging in practices or 
implementing policies that are antisemitic or 
otherwise promote antisemitism;
●No person shall be required to participate in 
programming or training that promotes or degrades 
any one religion; and
●Governmental entities are prohibited from enacting 
policies that promote or degrade any one religion.
4- 2299 Functions, Powers, and Duties of the Kansas Human Rights 
Commission
The bill would authorize the Kansas Human Rights 
Commission (Commission) to refer complaints to the Attorney 
General for review, investigation, and initiation of legal 
proceedings.
Complaints and Investigations by Attorney General
Under continuing provisions of the Act, the Attorney 
General may make, sign, and file a complaint whenever there 
is sufficient reason to believe that any person has engaged in 
a practice of discrimination, segregation, or separation in 
violation of the Act. The bill would authorize the Attorney 
General to investigate the alleged unlawful employment 
practice or unlawful discriminatory practice. During such 
investigation, the bill would authorize the Attorney General to:
●Subpoena witnesses, evidence, records, 
documents, and other material related to the 
complaint;
●Take testimony under oath;
●Examine or cause to be examined any records or 
other material that is relevant to the complaint;
●Require a person to attend any proceeding and 
provide testimony under oath regarding any 
material that is relevant to the complaint;
●Serve interrogatories; and
●Administer oaths and affirmations.
5- 2299 The bill would further authorize the Attorney General to 
file a petition in the district court where the alleged unlawful 
employment practice or unlawful discriminatory practice 
occurred, seeking damages in amount not to exceed $10,000 
per violation.
Damages for Pain, Suffering, and Humiliation
The bill would increase the limit on the amount of 
damages that may be awarded for pain, suffering, and 
humiliation which are incidental to the act of discrimination 
from $2,000 to $10,000.
Background
The bill was introduced by the House Committee on 
Education at the request of Representative Estes.
House Committee on Education
In the House Committee hearing, proponent testimony 
was provided by the Kansas Attorney General, 
representatives of Combat Antisemitism Movement and 
Jewish Community Relations Bureau|AJC, and two private 
citizens. The proponents generally stated the bill would help 
address religious discrimination and antisemitism on public 
campuses, and students shared their experiences with 
antisemitism on campuses. The conferees also shared 
statistics about the increase in antisemitic incidents in recent 
years.
Written-only proponent testimony was provided by two 
private citizens.
6- 2299 Opponent testimony was provided by representatives of 
Al-Hadaf KC, Kansas Association of School Boards, and 
Kansas National Educational Association and six private 
citizens. Opponents expressed concerns about the definition 
of “antisemitism” being linked to the IHRA working definition 
and suggested alternative definitions.
Written-only opponent testimony was provided by a 
representative of the ACLU of Kansas and 35 private citizens.
Neutral testimony was provided by the Executive 
Director of the Commission and a private citizen.
No other testimony was provided.
The House Committee amended the bill to restore 
continuing provisions of the Act regarding unlawful 
employment practices and unlawful discriminatory practices.
Fiscal Information
According to the fiscal note prepared by the Division of 
the Budget on the bill, as introduced, the Office of Judicial 
Administration (Office) indicates enactment of the bill could 
have a fiscal effect on the Judicial Branch operations 
because the bill would allow the Attorney General to file a 
petition with the district court for a hearing and would allow for 
appeals to be filed, which could increase the number of cases 
filed in the district court and result in more time spent by court 
employees and judges processing and deciding cases. The 
Office indicates enactment of the bill could result in the 
collection of docket fees and civil penalties assessed in those 
cases filed under the bill’s provisions, which would be 
credited to the State General Fund. However, a fiscal effect 
cannot be estimated.
7- 2299 The Office of the Attorney General states enactment of 
the bill would require additional expenditures of $158,284 in 
FY 2026 and $166,198 in FY 2027 from the State General 
Fund, along with an additional 1.50 FTE positions for both 
fiscal years to handle cases associated with the bill. Of the 
FY 2026 amount, $127,791 would be for salaries and wages 
for the additional positions and $30,493 would be for other 
operating expenditures.
The Commission indicates the bill’s enactment would 
have a fiscal effect on the operations of the agency; however, 
the Commission does not have enough information to 
estimate what that effect would be.
The Kansas Department of Education states the bill’s 
enactment would not have a fiscal effect on agency 
operations. The Board of Regents states the enactment of the 
bill would not have a fiscal effect on the operations of the 
agency or any Kansas postsecondary educational institution. 
Any fiscal effect associated with enactment of the bill is 
not reflected in The FY 2026 Governor’s Budget Report.
Education; discrimination; antisemitism; Kansas Act Against Discrimination; Kansas 
Attorney General; Kansas Human Rights Commission
8- 2299