Kansas 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2358 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/17/2025

                     
 
 
 
 
 
Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam C. Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
February 16, 2025 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Francis Awerkamp, Chairperson 
House Committee on Welfare Reform 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 152-S 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Representative Awerkamp: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for HB 2358 by House Committee on Welfare Reform 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning HB 2358 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 HB 2358 would require able-bodied adults and work registrants without dependents under 
six years of age to participate in an employment training program as a condition of receiving food 
assistance. 
 
Estimated State Fiscal Effect 
 	FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 
Expenditures    
   State General Fund  	-- $448,409 $656,957 
   Fee Fund(s) 	-- 	-- 	-- 
   Federal Fund 	-- 439,097 647,726 
      Total Expenditures 	-- $887,506 $1,304,683 
Revenues    
   State General Fund  	-- 	-- 	-- 
   Fee Fund(s) 	-- 	-- 	-- 
   Federal Fund 	-- 	-- 	-- 
      Total Revenues 	-- 	-- 	-- 
FTE Positions 	-- 5.00 5.00 
 
 According to the Department for Children and Families, enactment of HB 2358 would 
increase the number of persons who must participate in an employment and training program in  The Honorable Francis Awerkamp, Chairperson 
Page 2—HB 2358 
 
 
order to receive food assistance.  Currently, food assistance recipients with dependents under the 
age of 18 are not required to participate. 
 
 The bill would increase the number of individuals required to participate in a program to 
receive food assistance benefits.  It is estimated that there are 10,901 current work registrants with 
a child aged 6-17 not participating in an employment and training program.  It is estimated 10.0 
percent of the required individuals would participate in the program at a total cost of $497,280, 
including $248,640 from the State General Fund, for FY 2026 and a total cost of $917,280, 
including $458,640 from the State General Fund, for FY 2027 and beyond. Participant costs would 
require a 50.0 percent state match.  Those choosing not to participate would not be eligible for 
continued food assistance.  However, children and others, who could be exempt or were meeting 
requirements, would continue to be eligible for food assistance benefits.  Food assistance benefits 
are 100.0 percent federally funded. All changes to work requirements related to food assistance 
would require federal approval.  Additional state funding could be needed to obtain approval for 
these changes.  
 
 DCF states that to meet the projected increase in caseload, an additional 4.00 Human 
Service Specialist positions would be anticipated.  These positions would be assigned cases to 
manage and ensure work requirements are being met. The cost for the additional positions would 
include salary, fringe benefits, and other operating expenses totaling $321,446, including $160,723 
from the State General Fund, for FY 2026 and $319,232, including $159,616 from the State 
General Fund, for FY 2027.  These costs would be slightly adjusted in the out-years. 
 
 DCF also states that a non-compliance coordinator position would also need to be added. 
This position would assist with determining “good cause” and issuing penalties.  There is currently 
one position performing these duties.  The cost for the additional position would include salary, 
fringe benefits, and other operating expenses totaling $68,780, including $39,046 from the State 
General Fund, for FY 2026 and $68,171, including $38,701 from the State General Fund, for FY 
2027.  These costs would be slightly adjusted in the out-years. 
 
 The Office of Judicial Administration indicates that enactment of the bill would not have 
a fiscal effect on the Judicial Branch. Any fiscal effect associated with HB 2358 is not reflected 
in The FY 2026 Governor’s Budget Report.  
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam C. Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
cc:  Trisha Morrow, Judiciary  
 Kim Holter, Department for Children & Families