Kansas 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas Senate Bill SB16 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/12/2025

                    Division of the Budget 
Landon State Office Building 	Phone: (785) 296-2436 
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 	adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov 
Topeka, KS  66612 	http://budget.kansas.gov 
 
Adam C. Proffitt, Director 	Laura Kelly, Governor 
Division of the Budget 
 
March 12, 2025 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Brenda Dietrich, Chairperson 
Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance 
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 546-S 
Topeka, Kansas  66612 
 
Dear Senator Dietrich: 
 
 SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for SB 16 by Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs 
 
 In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning SB 16 is 
respectfully submitted to your committee. 
 
 SB 16 would prohibit a financial service company with total assets of $20.0 billion or more 
from discriminating against a person based on a person’s credit score. The bill would prohibit a 
financial service company from denying services based on non-financial criteria or ideological 
criteria or coordinating with other companies to discriminate against clients.  A financial services 
company would be required to provide a written explanations in 14-point bold font when denying 
services, detailing the specific data and criteria used for the denial.   
 
 The bill would require a registered investment adviser to obtain written consent from 
clients before investing their money in mutual funds, equity funds, or companies that engage in 
ideological boycotts.  The bill defines these boycotts as actions taken without ordinary business 
purpose to penalize companies that engage in fossil fuel production, nuclear energy, agriculture, 
lumber, mining, firearms, or those that do not meet certain environmental standards or diversity 
criteria. The Attorney General could enforce this consent requirement and also investigate any 
violations.   
 
 A financial service company that commits a deceptive act or practice would be subject to 
enforcement of the Attorney General.  A financial services company that is a credit union and 
commits an unsound practice would be subject to civil enforcement by the Credit Union 
Administrator.  An insurance company that commits an unsound practice would be subject to 
penalties by the Insurance Commissioner.  A company with five or more violations would be guilty 
of a class C nonperson misdemeanor.  The Honorable Brenda Dietrich, Chairperson 
Page 2—SB 16 
 
 
  
 The bill would require the State Bank Commissioner, the Insurance Commissioner, and the 
Credit Union Administrator to adopt rules and regulations to enforce the provisions of the bill no 
later than July 1, 2026. The bill would also prevent a public agency or official from modifying the 
$20.0 billion asset threshold that determines which financial institutions would be subject to the 
provisions of the bill. 
 
 The Office of Judicial Administration states that the bill could increase the number of cases 
filed in district court because the bill creates a new crime and authorizes the Attorney General to 
investigate and enforce violations.  This would increase the time spent by district court judicial 
and nonjudicial personnel in processing, researching, and hearing cases.  Because the bill creates 
a new crime that carries a class C misdemeanor penalty, there could also be more supervision of 
offenders required to be performed by court services officers.  The bill could increase the collection 
of docket fees, fines, and supervision fees that would be deposited into the State General Fund.  
However, the Office cannot determine a precise fiscal effect of the bill.    
 
 The Insurance Department states that the bill would require the agency to hire additional 
employees and would also increase fee fund expenditures by an unknown amount for those 
employees and related operating expenditures. The additional employees would create the 
regulatory framework to monitor and enforce the provisions of the bill; however, the agency cannot 
estimate a precise fiscal effect.  
 
 The Office of the Attorney General states that any additional expenditures to investigate 
and enforce deceptive acts and practices could be absorbed within existing resources.  The Office 
of the State Bank Commissioner and the Kansas Department of Credit Unions state that the bill 
would not affect agency expenditures or revenues.  Any fiscal effect associated with SB 16 is not 
reflected in The FY 2026 Governor’s Budget Report.  
 
 
 
 	Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 	Adam C. Proffitt 
 	Director of the Budget 
 
 
 
 
cc: Kyle Strathman, Insurance Department 
 Jesse Becker, Office of the State Bank Commissioner 
 Julie Murray, Department of Credit Unions