Kentucky House Bill HR141

Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/24/22
• Refer: 3/24/22
• Refer: 3/25/22
• Refer: 3/29/22
• Report Pass: 3/29/22
• Passed: 3/29/22

Caption

A RESOLUTION urging the United States House of Representatives to pass, and for President Joe Biden to sign, the Sunshine Protection Act of 2021.

Impact

The resolution suggests that the permanent adoption of daylight saving time could have positive implications for both residents and local businesses in Kentucky. Proponents argue that more daylight in the evenings will not only allow more recreational opportunities for families but also support local businesses by encouraging after-hours activities. Additionally, the reduction in clock changes is seen as a way to promote better mental health by alleviating the negative effects associated with the transition periods.

Summary

HR141 is a resolution urging the United States House of Representatives to pass and for President Joe Biden to sign the Sunshine Protection Act of 2021. This act seeks to make daylight saving time permanent, thereby eliminating the biannual clock changes. The resolution emphasizes the perceived benefits of a permanent daylight saving time, noting potential improvements in energy efficiency, reduction in traffic accidents, and enhanced overall well-being due to increased afternoon daylight throughout the year.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR141 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among lawmakers who advocate for the resolution. A notable aspect of the discussion is the assertion that the current practice of changing clocks creates unnecessary disruption and confusion. The resolution cites public support for the idea, indicating a general desire among citizens to eliminate the hassle of switching clocks and to embrace the benefits of unchanging, extended daylight.

Contention

While the resolution is presented in a positive light, concerns have been raised about the implications of permanently adopting daylight saving time. Detractors may argue that the potential benefits are overstated and that a fixed model could have unforeseen consequences, such as altering natural circadian rhythms or impacting certain sectors of the economy differently. The debate raises important questions regarding the balance of societal benefits and the potential for negative outcomes related to health and safety.