Kentucky Senate Bill SCR171

Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/22
• Refer: 3/3/22
• Refer: 3/7/22
• Report Pass: 3/15/22
• Engrossed: 3/22/22
• Refer: 3/22/22

Caption

A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION requesting the Legislative Research Commission to examine funding sources and research institutions capable of conducting a feasibility study of advanced nuclear energy technology for electric power generation in the Commonwealth.

Impact

This resolution seeks to address critical issues surrounding energy stability and affordability within the state. By exploring advanced nuclear technology, SCR171 aims to position the Commonwealth as a leader in energy innovation, potentially reducing greenhouse gas emissions while providing a reliable power source. If the feasibility study identifies viable pathways for investment and implementation, it could lead to significant advancements in the state's energy landscape and bolster economic development dependent on stable and low-cost energy supply.

Summary

SCR171 is a concurrent resolution requesting the Legislative Research Commission to examine funding sources and research institutions capable of conducting a feasibility study on advanced nuclear energy technology for electric power generation in the Commonwealth. The resolution emphasizes the benefits of advanced nuclear reactors, which are defined as having significant improvements over older reactor designs. Proponents argue that these technologies could stabilize the electric grid and support the integration of renewable energy sources due to their ability to adjust electricity output based on demand.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SCR171 is cautiously optimistic. Supporters of advanced nuclear technology highlight its low carbon footprint and ability to address energy demands effectively, which aligns with contemporary energy policies advocating for reduced emissions. However, there remains a segment of stakeholders who may express concerns over the safety and environmental implications of nuclear power, creating a dialogue on balancing innovation with public safety and environmental stewardship.

Contention

While SCR171 itself does not propose specific regulatory changes, the discussions surrounding it may reveal contention regarding the role of nuclear energy in the state’s future power generation portfolio. Some stakeholders may argue that focusing on nuclear energy diverts attention and resources from the expansion of purely renewable energy sources. Additionally, the approval process for the feasibility study's contract, as stipulated in the resolution, could bring about debates regarding state oversight and funding priorities in energy initiatives.