Kentucky Senate Bill SJR149

Kentucky 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/14/24
• Refer: 2/14/24
• Refer: 2/20/24
• Report Pass: 2/28/24
• Engrossed: 3/6/24
• Refer: 3/6/24
• Refer: 3/13/24
• Report Pass: 3/14/24
• Enrolled: 3/28/24
• Chaptered: 4/5/24
• Passed: 4/5/24

Caption

A JOINT RESOLUTION directing the Energy and Environment Cabinet to provide guidance and consultation on best management practices for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to entities that discharge directly or indirectly into Kentucky's waterways.

Impact

If enacted, SJR149 would significantly enhance the regulatory framework surrounding PFAS discharges. It mandates the Energy and Environment Cabinet to assist entities with the management of PFAS in accordance with EPA guidelines. This consultation would not only provide insights into compliance but would also involve a cost-benefit analysis and explore available funding options for implementing best practices. This approach signifies a proactive step towards minimizing PFAS impacts on water quality in Kentucky.

Summary

SJR149 is a joint resolution that directs the Energy and Environment Cabinet of Kentucky to provide guidance and consultation on best management practices for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to entities that discharge into the state's waterways. The bill emphasizes the need for proper management of PFAS, which are widely used in various products due to their durability and resistance. It underscores the growing concern over environmental contamination from these substances and aligns with increasing federal oversight regarding their regulation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be overwhelmingly positive among legislators, as evidenced by the unanimous voting results with 93 yeas and no nays. Lawmakers seem to view the bill as a necessary measure to address environmental health risks associated with PFAS, reflecting a commitment to protecting Kentucky's natural resources. However, there could be underlying concerns from environmental groups about the effectiveness and rigor of the guidance provided, highlighting a need for stringent oversight.

Contention

While SJR149 has garnered strong support, points of contention may arise regarding the implementation and enforcement of the guidance on PFAS management practices. Critics may argue that voluntary guidance lacks the teeth necessary to compel compliance from all entities. Furthermore, while the resolution promotes best practices, the actual impact on reducing PFAS contamination in waterways will largely depend on the commitment of discharging entities to follow the recommended practices. Ensuring effective communication and collaboration between the Energy and Environment Cabinet and these entities will be essential for success.