Louisiana House Bill HB1107

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 3/30/10
• Engrossed: 4/7/10
• Report Pass: 5/24/10
• Enrolled: 6/15/10
• Chaptered: 7/2/10
• Passed: 7/2/10

Caption

Authorizes a land swap between the Red River, Atchafalaya, and Bayou Beouf Levee District and an adjacent landowners (EN NO IMPACT LF EX See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB 1107 could streamline property management for the levee district and improve its ability to maintain and oversee levee systems critical to flood control in the region. The measure reflects an effort to balance public and private interests in land management, potentially increasing local development opportunities while ensuring the levee district can effectively manage environmental and infrastructural needs through strategic land use.

Summary

House Bill 1107 authorizes the Red River, Atchafalaya, and Bayou Beouf Levee District to engage in property exchanges with adjacent landowners in Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana. The bill specifies the exchange of two tracts of land, one from the levee district and another from private landowners. Notably, the bill reserves mineral rights, allowing the district to retain interests in any minerals found on the exchanged properties. The intention behind this legislation is to enhance land management efficiencies and facilitate land development for the levee district's operational needs.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding the bill indicates practical support among legislators who recognize the importance of effective levee management in mitigating flood risks. While specific discussions about the bill's implications were not extensively detailed, sentiments from stakeholders typically mirror a desire for improved infrastructure along the river systems, illustrating a broader support for measures that aid in regional safety and environmental control.

Contention

There appears to be minimal contention surrounding HB 1107 as the exchanges are focused at the administrative level without substantial opposition on record. However, potential concerns may arise around how these land exchanges could affect local landowners' rights, particularly regarding retention of mineral rights. Stakeholders may also seek clarity on the valuation methods for properties exchanged to ensure fair treatment of all parties involved.