Louisiana House Bill HB1328

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/19/10
• Refer: 4/20/10

Caption

Requires that the owner of dangerous dog shall maintain liability insurance to redress any personal injury inflicted by the animal

Impact

The implementation of HB 1328 is expected to significantly affect state laws regarding pet ownership. By enforcing insurance requirements, the bill could promote responsible pet ownership and reduce the financial burden on victims of dog attacks. The law stipulates that insurers must notify the Department of Public Safety and Corrections regarding the status of liability policies, thereby instituting a systematic monitoring approach to dangerous dog ownership. Failure to adhere to these insurance requirements could result in fines or imprisonment of up to six months.

Summary

House Bill 1328 mandates that owners, keepers, or harborers of dangerous dogs must maintain a liability insurance policy of at least $100,000. The bill defines a 'dangerous dog' based on specific behaviors, including attacks on humans and domestic animals, or being involved in crimes. This legislation aims to ensure that there is financial recourse for injuries caused by these animals, thereby enhancing public safety and accountability among pet owners.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1328 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary measure for public safety, asserting that it protects citizens from high medical costs resulting from dog attacks. Conversely, opponents express concerns regarding the burden this legislation creates for dog owners, particularly those who may face challenges acquiring insurance for certain breeds commonly classified as dangerous. There are fears that this measure could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals or families who own pets.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the definitions set forth in the bill regarding what constitutes a 'dangerous dog.' Many stakeholders are debating whether the stipulated behaviors are sufficient and accurate, with some advocating for broader definitions. Additionally, there are concerns about the enforcement of the insurance requirements and the potential for increased premiums, which may discourage pet ownership altogether. The balance between ensuring public safety and facilitating responsible dog ownership remains a key issue within the discussions surrounding this bill.