Louisiana House Bill HB1383

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/20/10
• Refer: 4/21/10

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of certain judgments against DOTD

Impact

The enactment of HB 1383 will ensure that the state fulfills its financial obligation resulting from this legal case. This appropriation reflects the state's responsibility in managing and addressing legal claims against state departments, in this instance, the DOTD. The impact extends to the fiscal planning of the state budget, as appropriated funds must be managed cautiously to ensure that other essential state services are not jeopardized due to this expenditure.

Summary

House Bill 1383 authorizes the appropriation of $20,000 from the General Fund of the State of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2010-2011. This funding is specifically allotted to pay a consent judgment resulting from a lawsuit titled 'Stacy Faia and Chris Faia, et al. v. L. C. Davis and others,' which involves the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) and several insurance companies. The judgment is part of a legal agreement reached through negotiations rather than a court ruling after a trial, indicating that the parties opted to resolve the matter outside of court following a mutual agreement.

Sentiment

While there may not have been significant public discourse surrounding HB 1383, the sentiment regarding such appropriations typically hinges on accountability and transparency in government spending. Supporters of the bill likely view it as a necessary financial commitment to resolve an outstanding legal matter, thereby preventing further legal complications for the state. Opponents, however, might express concern regarding the allocation of state funds and prioritize the need for scrutiny on how taxpayer money is being utilized.

Contention

The primary points of contention around HB 1383 revolve around the implications of appropriating funds for legal judgments. Questions may arise concerning the financial priorities of the state, especially in times of budget constraints or competing needs for funding in areas like education, health, and infrastructure. Moreover, debate could be generated around the responsibility of state agencies in managing risks and legal obligations effectively to minimize future financial liabilities.