Louisiana House Bill HB1457

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/20/10
• Refer: 4/21/10
• Report Pass: 5/24/10
• Engrossed: 6/4/10
• Refer: 6/7/10
• Report Pass: 6/15/10
• Enrolled: 6/21/10
• Chaptered: 7/8/10
• Passed: 7/8/10

Caption

Relative to payments in lieu of ad valorem tax paid by a lessee to a political subdivision, industrial development board, or certain public trust in relation to a securitized transaction (EN NO IMPACT LF RV See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB 1457 will affect how payments in lieu of taxes are treated legally in Louisiana. It seeks to ensure that lessees who benefit from public projects and properties are accountable for payments equivalent to the taxes they would have paid if they owned the property. This consistency in treatment may help streamline the collection of revenue for local governments and public trusts, potentially increasing the financial resources available for public services.

Summary

House Bill 1457 aims to amend existing laws concerning payments in lieu of ad valorem taxes that lessees must make to political subdivisions, industrial development boards, or public trusts in the state of Louisiana. The bill specifically establishes that payments made to compensate for services by these entities should be recognized as statutory impositions. This is an effort to clarify the financial responsibilities of lessees who operate within the jurisdiction of these governing bodies while ensuring that they are contributing equitably to the local taxation system.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be generally positive among those who support the need for clarity and fairness in taxation. Advocates argue that establishing these payments as statutory impositions will provide local governments with a firmer footing to enforce tax collection, thus enhancing local revenue streams. However, there may be reservations from certain business communities concerned about additional financial responsibilities and the bureaucratic implications of these enforced payments.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 1457 might arise from the specifics surrounding the definitions and enforcement of these payments. Concerns could be raised about the potential for increased costs for businesses, particularly small enterprises, which might be disproportionately impacted by the added obligations. Furthermore, discussions may focus on how this change affects existing exemptions and the implications it has on previous agreements made between lessees and local authorities.