Louisiana House Bill HB152

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/19/10
• Engrossed: 4/27/10
• Report Pass: 5/24/10

Caption

Provides for a five-year suspension of a driver's license if driving while license is suspended (RE DECREASE SG RV See Note)

Impact

The revision in the law signifies a significant change in how the state handles driving offenses related to license suspensions. By increasing the length of suspension for repeat offenders, the bill seeks to reduce the number of drivers on the road who may pose risks due to having their driving privileges revoked. Additionally, the bill introduces provisions for obtaining a restricted driver's license under specific conditions, allowing individuals to apply for limited driving privileges only after their first suspension. Such changes may impact the number of people affected by license suspensions, impacting overall traffic safety in the state.

Summary

House Bill 152 aims to establish stricter penalties for individuals who drive while their licenses are suspended or revoked. The bill extends the mandatory suspension period from one year to two years following a conviction of this nature and stipulates that an additional two years will be added for each subsequent conviction. This measure is intended to deter repeat offenses and improve road safety by ensuring that those who have had their driving privileges revoked are held accountable under stricter guidelines.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 152 appears to be generally supportive among legislators focused on enhancing public safety and reducing traffic offenses. Advocates argue that the bill's strict penalties could lead to improved compliance with driving regulations. However, some voices express concern that the extended suspension periods may disproportionately affect individuals reliant on their vehicles for employment and daily necessities. This reflects a tension between improving road safety and maintaining individual rights and access to transportation.

Contention

One notable contention within the discussions surrounding HB 152 is the balance between public safety and personal freedom. Critics highlight that the extended suspension periods could punish individuals who may have already faced significant hardships. Furthermore, the requirement for hardship applications only after specific convictions might not adequately address the needs of those for whom driving is essential for work and healthcare. The proposed amendments regarding restricted licenses also raised questions about fairness and accessibility.