Louisiana House Bill HB371

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Provides with respect to postsecondary education facilities' access to criminal records

Impact

The changes proposed by HB 371 would modify R.S. 15:587.2(B) to ensure that postsecondary institutions can request and receive detailed criminal history records from both the Louisiana Bureau of Criminal Identification and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. By expanding the scope of information available, this bill would facilitate more thorough evaluations of applicants, potentially influencing hiring decisions based on past criminal behavior. This could promote safer educational settings but may also raise concerns regarding privacy and the implications of past arrests on employment opportunities.

Summary

House Bill 371 seeks to amend the existing provisions regarding access to criminal records for postsecondary educational institutions in Louisiana. The bill specifically allows these institutions to obtain not only the conviction records of prospective employees but also any relevant information pertaining to their arrest history. This aims to enhance the safety and integrity of hiring practices within educational environments, providing institutions with a more comprehensive view of candidates' backgrounds.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 371 appears to align largely with the pursuit of ensuring safer educational environments. Supporters likely advocate for the bill's ability to provide institutions with critical information that can secure campuses and protect students. However, there might be contention among advocates for hiring equity and privacy, who may view the bill as another barrier for those with criminal histories seeking employment in education-related fields. Concerns about the potential for discrimination based on arrest records could spark debates about the balance between safety and fair hiring practices.

Contention

Debates around HB 371 may focus on the progression from merely accessing conviction records to including all arrest records. While proponents argue this enhances safety, opponents could contend that arrest records do not necessarily equate to guilt or a reliable indicator of future behavior. The expansion of access could lead to possible misuse of information, and critics may worry that it could disproportionately affect marginalized groups seeking employment in education. Thus, discussions may arise about the need for safeguards to ensure that such records do not unjustly impede job opportunities.