Louisiana House Bill HB477

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Prohibits pictures of public officials or employees above a certain size in public documents

Impact

The bill amends existing law related to public printing, where current regulations already limit the ability of public officials to have their names or pictures used on drivers' licenses and public vehicles. By extending this restriction to printed documents, the legislation aims to ensure that public materials remain unbiased and focused on official content rather than personal images. Violations of this regulation could lead to financial penalties and liability for officials who disregard these guidelines, emphasizing accountability in public service.

Summary

House Bill 477 seeks to regulate the use of images of public officials and employees in public printed documents by enforcing a size limitation. Specifically, the bill provides that no public official or employee may include their picture in any printed material if the image exceeds two inches by two inches. This measure is intended to maintain a standard and limit the prominence of individual public officials in government communications, potentially addressing concerns about the perception of public resources being used for personal promotion.

Sentiment

Discussions around HB 477 have generated mixed sentiments. Proponents argue that the bill represents a necessary step towards responsible governance and reduces the risk of public resources being misused for self-aggrandizement by officials. However, opponents may view these limitations as excessive, arguing that they hinder transparency and the ability of the public to recognize their elected officials, which could benefit civic engagement.

Contention

This bill has sparked debate regarding freedom of expression and the role of public image in governance. Critics may challenge the practicality of enforcement and the implications it holds for public relations strategies within government communications. The contention likely stems from a balance between preventing potential misuse of taxpayer-funded materials and ensuring that government officials are appropriately recognized in their public service roles.