Louisiana House Bill HB672

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Requires that copies of public records be provided in an electronic format unless it creates an undue burden on the custodian or compromises the security of proprietary software (OR SEE FISC NOTE LF RV)

Impact

The implications of HB 672 are significant, as it modernizes how state agencies manage public records, reflecting the increasing reliance on digital communication and information sharing. By requiring that public records be provided electronically, the bill seeks to streamline processes, reduce delays in accessing information, and ultimately foster a more open and transparent government. However, it establishes specific provisions to protect custodians from undue stress, thereby balancing the need for access with operational realities.

Summary

House Bill 672 addresses the production of public records in the state by mandating that copies be provided in electronic format unless certain conditions apply. The bill stipulates that custodians of public records must deliver copies electronically, with the exception of cases where such delivery imposes an undue burden or risks compromising proprietary software security. This legislation aims to enhance the accessibility and efficiency of public records for citizens, ensuring that as much information as possible is readily available in a digital format.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 672 appears to lean toward positive acceptance among advocates of transparency and digital accessibility. Supporters argue that it represents a progressive step in facilitating access to public information, which is essential for informed citizenship. However, there may be concerns about the feasibility and potential administrative burdens on custodians, particularly smaller agencies that may not have the infrastructure to comply easily with the electronic format requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the stipulation that custodians bear the burden of proof when it comes to claiming delivery in electronic format creates an undue burden. Critics may argue this places an additional responsibility on custodians, which could lead to disputes about what constitutes an 'undue burden'. Moreover, while the bill emphasizes efficiency and transparency, there are underlying concerns about the potential for compromising proprietary software if the custodians lack the necessary technological safeguards.